User talk:Kgrad

Welcome!

Hello, Kgrad! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 00:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

October 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Saltwater Crocodile worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 01:00, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Hi, just letting you know that this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Butte,_Montana&diff=prev&oldid=321127104 broke a link when a comma was added to the link text. I'm sure it was accidental, and it is now repaired. best wishes, Richard Myers (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 05:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not see my notice above, or something? --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 05:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bump.--M4gnum0n (talk) 11:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== re November 18, 2010 Reading the entry on jealousy: section on culture and attitudes toward Jealousy == "changed significantly in the US during the 1960s and 1970s. […] " What references indicate that it became viewed more negatively starting in these decades ? Kgrad (talk) 14:42, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Make sure when you change anything within a Wikilink that it does not turn the link red. Even in seemingly minor things like Lowry bill changing it to Lowry Bill turns the link red as you can see. I am going to change the title of the page to Lowry Bill, but just make sure your helpful edits don't also make work for others. To avoid the redlink, you can use piping [[Lowry bill|Lowry Bill]] which will turn out like this: Lowry Bill. --JonRidinger (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I may have broken a link when a comma was subtracted from a link text in Theo van Gogh article. Please let me know. Thanks.Kgrad (talk) 18:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You only break a link if you change the text inside the [[ and ]] markings in editing mode. In this case, the comma was outside the brackets, so it didn't change the internal link. However, it made for a very long "Dutch Minister of Justice Christian Democrat Pieter...", so I added "and" between Minister of Justice and Christian Democrat and changed the dashes to the longer em dashes (—). If you're ever unsure about whether your changes are breaking links, make sure you use "Show preview" for your edits and check to make sure the link is still blue before hitting "Save page". --JonRidinger (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

...for your grammar/phrasing/flow corrections to the Paris article, the best I've seen since years. What is your specialty? Cheers.THEPROMENADER 16:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing ! I grew up in a highly grammar-conscious home and worked to add depth to my language skills throughout my time spent in public schools. Having majored in French at Kalamazoo College (class of 1965) – including 6 months' foreign study at France's Université de Caen (Normandie) – I went on to add a teaching minor in Spanish, and became ever more aware of the beauty of a well crafted text. Unlike English – where the comment "Oh, you know what I mean!" is used as an excuse by those who find grammar tedious – other languages require a particular sentence structure where items such as relative clauses must be in their place. Ever since staying late for after-school English classes offered at the high school my siblings and I attended, I have reveled in the delightful challenges of diagramming sentences correctly; I have always found the study of grammar intriguing and exciting.

My specialty: improving any text while maintaining its original integrity. Improper word order and typos jump out at me even though I never look for them... some are lurking in published texts, hoping to remain unnoticed... My joy: speaking French with others who have that ability. Cheers to you. Kgrad (talk) 23:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply ; )

Your language skills were rather obvious, but I had to ask all the same... as a well-read native English-speaker, I too appreciate the well-written word, but I seem to have lost some of the "usage" aspects of the language after living more than twenty years abroad (Paris). Today I have the bad habit of mixing French usage into my English writings, resulting in phrasing that can seem rather '18th-century', or 'Yoda-speak' to put it more humorously.

I have been passionate about Paris' history (and its modern workings) since I've lived here. Perhaps together we can work towards bringing the Paris article up to FA status? Do let me know if you are interested. Take care ; ) THEPROMENADER 09:49, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is FA Status? Kgrad (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing of emdashes

Hi, per WP:EMDASH, emdashes (—) should be unspaced. Just a head's up—indopug (talk) 07:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HI,

Thanks for your note. WP:EMDASH does indeed say that these dashes should be unspaced, but I strongly disagree. One reason: Gluing together words in this way leaves orphan blank areas in any printed text that continues on the following line. Another: Spelling rules look down on words that stick together in this way. Third: Where hyphenated words occur, using before-and-after unspaced em-dashes would be a nightmare. Fourth: In reading a dash-containing sentence, the reader pauses briefly before and after the words so set off; the em-dashes tell the reader to pause in much the same way as do parentheses and en-dashes.

In my opinion, in the case of "Just a head's up—" 'up...' is what's needed. It may be that the noun is 'a head's-up'; a noun made up of two stand-alone words needs a hyphen to create one stand-alone word... ]

I love punctuation; depending on its use, it can change the meaning of a sentence — such fun !

Best wishes to you Kgrad (talk) 18:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When one disagrees with WP policies and guidelines, the solution is to obtain WP:CONSENSUS to change them rather than violating them. AV3000 (talk) 11:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(The appropriate places for communication are Talk pages, not User pages.) To discuss policies and guidelines, edit the appropriate Talk page, Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style in this case; note past discussions on this issue in its archive. AV3000 (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Inbox K-12 Schools

This is a needed category. Vinalhaven School is a K-12 school, not a secondary school; it should not be listed as one. Whoever knows how to correct this situation, please step up to do it. Thanks Kgrad (talk) 05:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edits

Thanks for spotting my errors on the Caddo-related articles. Cheers,Uyvsdi (talk) 06:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

Non-breaking spaces

Care to elaborate on why you're removing all the non-breaking spaces from Mitt Romney? WP:NBSP calls for them in several of these contexts, such as $123 million and before spaced en-dashes. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contacting me about these changes. I believed them necessary but now understand why the non-breaking spaces were there. Where do I find the procedure to reverse the changes ? I will take the time needed to do this. Kgrad (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the article history, click "prev" to see what each edit changed, then click "undo" and "save" for those edits you wish to back out. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clementi talk page

You might not want to copyedit other editors' comments. Please see WP:TPO. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

8 October 2012 I have no idea what the recent note to me is about. Care to be more specific ? Thanks for clearing this up. Kgrad (talk) 03:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

9 October 2012 The following exchange has me puzzled. I have not been able to consult anyone on the errors I may have made. If I copy-edited other editors' comments, I was not aware of doing so. My apologies in any event. re Africa: I have not made any changes citing "neutralization". I find no talk page for Fort Henry. How to proceed ? Kgrad (talk) 15:49, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might not want to copyedit other editors' comments. Please see WP:TPO. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	+	
	+

Africa

	+	
	+

Hello Kgrad

	+	
	+

The note already existing in the article Africa has been modified in a strange way under the alleged reason of neutralization. Many statements have been removed by user user:Omar-Toons to be replaced by the official Moroccan point of view. The user did not even ask for the existing note to be sourced.

A barnstar for you!

		CopyEditor's BarnStar
		I award you this CopyEditor's BarnStar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This'll give you something to put on that redlinked user page, if you like. Thanks for your efforts. -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CopyEditor's BarnStar ! I appreciate your noticing. You said: "This'll give you something to put on that redlinked user page, if you like." What is a redlinked user page ? I often find the Wiki protocol a bit confusing... Is there a specific place to look up what I don't understand ? Kgrad (talk) 23:29, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to thank you for your copyedits to Ernest Shackleton, and will try to answer your questions above. A WP:red link is a wikilink to a page that does not exist (at least yet). Your WP:user page is at User:Kgrad and is one place where you could put the barnstar, if you wanted. I find that if I don't know a term on Wikipedia, say "foo" as a made-up example, often times I can type in "Wikipedia:foo" or wahtever the term is in the search box (top right corner) and find out. Hope this helps, and thanks again, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS I now see Wikipedia:foo is a link to the page on sandboxes!

FeydHuxtable has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}

I was going to give you a copy editing barnstar for your work on Simone Weil. As you have one already, please accept a wiki Kitten! FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

a request

In 2010 you edited the article on John Kiriakou. In doing so you really messed it up. The record shows you made an attempt to clean up after yourself -- but an ineffective one.

I found your replacement of valid references with bracketed numbers: "[1][2][3]" frankly shocking. I assumed you were a complete newcomer. But your contribution history showed you had already made over 500 edits.

It is four years later and I really hope you are a competent contributor now

I am disturbed that you were mucked about with this article, without really knowing what you were doing then.

I am disturbed that no one noticed you removed the completely valid {{infobox person}} for over four years.

No offense, but I think that you made this mistake, even though you were not a beginner, had made over 500 edits, strongly suggests all your early edits should be given a thorough review, in case you made similar mistakes elsewhere. My request to you -- if you now have the experience to recognize and correct bad edits you made in the past, would you please consider undertaking this review yourself? Geo Swan (talk) 19:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ifriqiya may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

From their base in [[Kairouan], the [[Aghlabids]] conquered [[Sicily]], beginning in 827 and establishing the [[Emirate

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you for fixing up the History of Canada article Moxy (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canadians and Culture of Canada can use a nice copy edit too :-) LOL ... keep up the good work . -- Moxy (talk) 04:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Military history of Canada and Multiculturalism in Canada :-) -- Moxy (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You even think of joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors ?? -- Moxy (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article

I think that, if you click on "View source" at the top of the article on Galileo, you will find that the article is in British English. Word order in this differs from that in America and Canada. This is common with adverbs such as "only". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.239.144 (talk) 10:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rockwell Kent may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dumfries House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dovecot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology!

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 663 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in evolutionary biology.

Browse the new WikiProject page
Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Brad Pitt does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! - ^theWOLFchild 23:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Boyle and commas

Hi. I've reverted some of your changes to Susan Boyle. A comma after a short introductory prepositional phrases is optional and usually not necessary or desirable. There are lots of takes and opinions on this, but The Chicago Manual Of Style is as good as any. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kgrad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks , thanks, thanks

For copy edits at Ruby Ridge. Would appreciate you looking in again, esp. after the "Under Construction" / "In Use" tag comes down. While most edits you are doing are fixes to text that precedes my work, I am sure there will be more needed from the editing I do. (I am careful, and married to a BELS editor, but one only has so much time.) When it comes to the special syntax being used for the short citations for the government reports in the bibliography, the aim has been to make all citations of same style (both the short ones and the long ones). If they need to change in future, for purposes of honing better to an APS or other citation style standard, I understand. Perhaps ask my help if you address this, and I will help. But as the saying goes, it takes half the time to bring a project to 90% complete, and the other half of the time for the last 10%. My goal is to get it to the 90% as fast as I can. Cheers, discuss in Talk at article, if anything needs be discussed. Thanks again. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 04:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kgrad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing

Thanks for your copy edits to 2010-2017 Toronto serial homicides, some definite improvements there. I've more or less been trying to keep the article stable while making periodic updates. Since you're familiar with the article and MOS issues, I was wondering if I could trouble you to look at Talk:2010-2017 Toronto serial homicides#Removal of hyphens. It is an embarrassingly WP:LAME situation but I'd prefer it to be resolved.

Also, I'd like to invite you to take a look at the Guild of Copy Editors. We are having a copy-editing drive this month, and you'd be welcome as a member or guest. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:37, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

commas again

As has been flagged to you before introductory commas are an Americanism. "Over the next few years, García Lorca became increasingly involved". "From 1925 to 1928, he was passionately involved with Dalí". They are not needed outside US articles. Thanks Anna (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kgrad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for editing Amchitka! Poydoo (talk) 14:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Improved punctuation"

I notice you've been making improvements to punctuation on various articles, and others have been correcting your corrections. Help me out. At Kerri Strug, the sentence read:

"She beat the competition at the 1996 American Cup in the all-around by almost a half point, which was a huge margin with the scoring system at that time."

You changed it to...

"She beat the competition at the 1996 American Cup in the all-around by almost a half point, something which was a huge margin with the scoring system at that time."

I'm not sure how this was an improvement?

At Fargo, North Dakota, the sentence read:

"It is a cultural, retail, health care, educational, and industrial center for southeastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota."

You changed it to...

"It is a cultural, retail, healthcare, educational, and industrial center for southeastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota."

Here is a link to the City of Fargo where it is spelled "health care".
Here is a link to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs in Fargo, where "health care" is used repeatedly.

Perhaps I am missing something? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Brittney Griner, especially if it involves living persons. Your edits have been reverted. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I would never add defamatory content to Wikipedia, please explain your comment. TY. Kgrad (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Anne Boleyn

Delighted! Gerunds aren't dead.--AntientNestor (talk) 08:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gerunds are alive and well! I appreciate your recognizing them as needing possessives before them whether spoken or in print. Kgrad (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Your recognizing"!

AntientNestor (talk) 22:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]