User talk:Harper J. Cole

Welcome!

Hi Harper J. Cole! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 16:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1988 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1988 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 00:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Torrez

Changes addressed; thanks for the review! Let me say, having seen tons of GA reviews before, you seem like a pro at this! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1988 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1988 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1988 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wilmer Mizell

Changes addressed! Thanks for taking on this review! Let me know if anything more is needed! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 01:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UPI NFL Most Valuable Player Award (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at National Football League Most Valuable Player Award instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please issue a split request at the talk page for NFL MVP award if you are planning to spin this off from the NFL MVP award

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UPI NFL Most Valuable Player Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UPI NFL Most Valuable Player Award, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Harper J. Cole! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro Football Writers of America NFL Most Valuable Player Award (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at National Football League Most Valuable Player Award instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please discuss this at the NFL MVP Award talk page whether this should be split out.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pro Football Writers of America NFL Most Valuable Player Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pro Football Writers of America NFL Most Valuable Player Award, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from National Football League Most Valuable Player Award into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I went and added attribution to the talk page already. Cheers. —Bagumba (talk) 11:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UPI NFL Most Valuable Player Award has been accepted

UPI NFL Most Valuable Player Award, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Raschi

Changes addressed; thanks for the review! Regarding the comments by Eggishorn, I must disagree with him. I've had several articles become GAs that relied even more heavily on SABR than this one did. This article is a product of research from SABR, Baseball-Reference, and the New York Times primarily, though it cites many other sources as well (including the Gittleman book, which despite Eggishorn's claim to the contrary is directly cited in the article). Like I said on the review page, sometimes SABR will credit specific sources with its information, and I can use those cites in the article. This SABR article did not do that, though, so I had to cite the article directly. SABR is a reliable source (it is part of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State University), and though I cite it heavily, that should not be a problem. I've left the tag on the article because you're the reviewer; if you think it is well-researched enough, I think you can take it off; though if you have concerns about the article's amount of research, let me know. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 01:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1960 Los Angeles Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1960 Los Angeles Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 22:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Woods (baseball)

Changes addressed; thanks for the review! Let me know if anything more is needed! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1960 Los Angeles Chargers season

The article 1960 Los Angeles Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1960 Los Angeles Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 02:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
		For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:1965 American Football League All-Star game, from its old location at User:Harper J. Cole/1965 American Football League All-Star game. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1965 American Football League All-Star game has been accepted

1965 American Football League All-Star game, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1989 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1989 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 20:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1989 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1989 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1989 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 23:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2019 schedule

Hello, Harper J. Cole. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2019 schedule, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2019 schedule

Hello, Harper J. Cole. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019 schedule".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1961 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1961 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by User:BubbaDaAmogus BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 22:57, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1961 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1961 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1961 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by User:BubbaDaAmogus BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 22:57, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1961 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1961 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1961 San Diego Chargers season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 06:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1990 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1990 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 16:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled (moved)

First of all, it surprises me enough how some people take Wikipedia seriously, that is surprising. When it comes to writing something, you need to be clear and precise. I can't believe you are on this site and seeing some people talk about it is ridiculous to an extent. You don't need to talk let alone be a part of something, simple as that. To be honest, I am mainly focused on confronting you more than anything else. I do like Wikipedia and I just don't like how some people treat it. Whether there need to be something done about what you said depends on what you have said. I will ignore you seeing as talking to you or some people is almost pointless. Again, don't be sarcastic or rude. I will not keep talking to you, simple as that. I am surprising my IP will be exposed, actually although I hope enough it's not bad. I said enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8084:A5BD:E80:24D8:2CA9:6694:3838 (talk) 22:50, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1990 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1990 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1990 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1991 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1991 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1991 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1991 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1991 San Diego Chargers season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1991 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1991 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1991 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 02:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fouts

Excellent job filling out Dan Fouts, especially with sources! The hard thing with adding details on an accomplished player is putting the game details into perspective. Sometimes it's not obvious until later in the editing process. Eventually, see how much of the game details might be better moved to the respective team season articles and their game recaps. This balances the bio from becoming too repetitive with game stat lines. Ideally in bios, it's better to summarize a season or stretches of games, leaving individual game mentions to true career highlights. Don't misunderstand, what you've been doing is fine. I'm more commenting on how to refine the bio once the raw facts are assembled. Sometimes a newspaper article from after a specific season can help frame that perspective. Anyways, glad to see the progress. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 02:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'll go back over the career section once I've gone through his college years. I'd like to get the article to FA status eventually.

Bagumba Do you think we need the section on Chargers franchise records? It's difficult to source without using original research from a stats website (the NFL Record and Fact Book only has his TD passes in a game record on their list of Charger records, and I've mentioned that one in the body of the text). As he set some of the biggest NFL records during his career, club records don't seem as important.--Harper J. Cole (talk) 00:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The ones that are already listed seem like standard stats and are probably fine; I'm sure they'd be mentioned in a newspaper too if we dug hard. There's probably a bunch more in the team media guide, which might be getting excessive (WP:FANCRUFT).—Bagumba (talk) 00:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bagumba I've trimmed out some of the less important game details now. Let me know if there's more that should be taken out. As things stand, I just need to add a section at the end on his life outside football, and then I can put it up for good article status.--Harper J. Cole (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to take a look in a few days.—Bagumba (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got through some of it. Here's some comments for improvement:

Per MOS:CONTEXTBIO, the opening paragraph should include some of his most notable achivements e.g. All-Pros, 4,000 yards, HOF? The rest of the lead can supplement.
College career: Can the text after "Things were quite different ..." go chronologically to the end of the section.
1975 and 1976 rely too much on reciting stats db facts.
"Fouts expressed a desire to leave San Diego, and complained at a new collective bargaining agreement, which meant the Chargers had only to match the offer of another team to prevent him from leaving": it seems to incorrectly imply his complaining allowed the Chargers to block him from leaving.

—Bagumba (talk) 11:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sup

	The Dancing Award
	Keep kicking ass!!! BeerPizzaCoffeeWeed (talk) 23:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1962 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1962 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1962 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1962 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1962 San Diego Chargers season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1962 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1962 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1962 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1976 Week 9 announcers for Colts-Chargers

Hello.

As I know, Ross Porter did not call the Colts-Chargers game. He was calling the Steelers-Chiefs game (which the Steelers would end the Chiefs scoring streak). The website by the of mcmillenandwife has that game and it does sound like Ross Porter and Lionel Aldridge called that game (Steelers-Chiefs). I say either Jay Randolph, Jack Buck, Jim Simpson, Tim Ryan, or Charlie Jones was the play-by-play announcers for that game (Colts-Chargers) but I am not sure who was though. JCartoonsFan 2021 (talk) 21:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I don't know the commentators well enough to recognise them by their voices. I'm going by the Pro Football Researchers Association's announcers list. If that's wrong then I don't know of any other sources to check. Harper J. Cole (talk) 22:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I say Jay Randolph (play-by-play) or Jack Buck/Paul Maguire (who was put in that Steelers-Chiefs game on the announcers list) called that game. JCartoonsFan 2021 (talk) 21:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I could check with the fellow who compiled the PFRA data? It looks like he's on Twitter. Harper J. Cole (talk) 22:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If not, check from the newspaper site for the announcers (that game got blacked out in San Diego). JCartoonsFan 2021 (talk) 06:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JCartoonsFan 2021 It took me a while, but I found a more reliable source for the TV pairings. Jack Buck was the Chargers-Colts commentator, as you said.[1] I've corrected it now. Harper J. Cole (talk) 18:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		For all your great work on SD/LA Chargers seasons. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Much appreciated. Harper J. Cole (talk) 20:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Los Angeles Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Los Angeles Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 13:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Los Angeles Chargers season

The article 2021 Los Angeles Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2021 Los Angeles Chargers season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Los Angeles Chargers season

The article 2021 Los Angeles Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Los Angeles Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 22:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Fouts

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dan Fouts you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Fouts

The article Dan Fouts you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dan Fouts for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 19:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Fouts

The article Dan Fouts you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dan Fouts for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 21:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fouts

Congrats on the GA. Sorry I never got back to reviewing it further above. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar has been more of my back-burner bio, and even that has been a crawl.—Bagumba (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My two lasting memories of the old OR versions of Fouts' bio are "one of the most prolific passing quarterbacks during the Golden Age of the 1970s and 1980s" and "This required a tough, intelligent quarterback with a strong arm. Fouts fit the bill." Classic.—Bagumba (talk) 04:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (and thanks for your edits since the promotion)! I started out just planning a tidy up, but I find it hard to stop short of GA status. I learned some new things, at any rate. Genuinely shocked that Fouts still has the playoff record for consecutive 300-yard games, considering how pass-oriented the game is these days.Harper J. Cole (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

page numbers

At this edit, you created this citation template:

{{cite news |last1=Baum |first1=Bob |title=Chargers stand up again |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/106241145/chargers-23-15-cardinals-23-sep-2002/ |agency=AP |issue=B1, [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/106241366/chargers-23-15-cardinals-23-sep-2002/ B3] |publisher=Santa Maria Times}}

Baum, Bob. "Chargers stand up again". No. B1, B3. Santa Maria Times. AP. {{cite news}}: External link in |issue= (help)

There are two problems with this template: in-source page numbers go in |page= or |pages=, not in |issue= (which is used to hold the issue number of a periodical). Santa Maria Times is the newspaper, not the newspaper's publisher. A correctly written template looks like this:

{{cite news |last1=Baum |first1=Bob |title=Chargers stand up again |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/106241145/chargers-23-15-cardinals-23-sep-2002/ |agency=Associated Press |pages=B1, [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/106241366/chargers-23-15-cardinals-23-sep-2002/ B3] |newspaper=Santa Maria Times |via=Newspapers.com}}

Baum, Bob. "Chargers stand up again". Santa Maria Times. Associated Press. pp. B1, B3 – via Newspapers.com.

I spelled out 'Associated Press' because that is how the agency is named in the newspaper article. I also added |via=Newspapers.com because the source is delivered to our readers from distributor that not the Santa Maria Times.

Please take more care when writing citation templates so that I and other editors don't have to clean up after.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trappist the monk: Thank you - to be honest, I am aware of these issues. When using the "cite news" template, "newspaper" and "page"/"pages" don't seem to be given as options, unless I'm missing something. Therefore, I put the data in the "publisher" and "issue" fields, then try to remember to manually edit them afterwards. I always make a final check when I'm done with editing a page, e.g. this edit, where I correct over 70 instances. Of course, other editors can't know that I'm going to do that. I'll try to get into the habit of checking my work more often. Harper J. Cole (talk) 19:13, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When using the "cite news" template, "newspaper" and "page"/"pages" don't seem to be given as options What editor are you using? If you are using visual editor, all of those listed at Template:Cite news § TemplateData either as the canonical parameter name or as aliases. If you are using the WP:RefToolbar editor, aliases of the canonical parameter names are not listed because of lack of space for them. |newspaper= is an alias of |work=. |page= and |pages= are listed in the 'second page' (click the 'Show/hide extra fields' button).

I don't use either of these editors (especially not ve) but if you really don't see these options and are using one of these editors, there is likely a bug in one or both that should be reported so that it can be fixed.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 19:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trappist the monk: Thanks again - I use WP:RefToolbar. I see what to do now. Apologies for any inconvenience. Harper J. Cole (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1963 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1963 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1963 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1963 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1963 San Diego Chargers season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1963 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1963 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1963 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of Los Angeles Chargers first-round draft picks

Congratulations, Harper J. Cole! The list you nominated, List of Los Angeles Chargers first-round draft picks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notifications

I happened to pass through the Fouts' FA review and saw you mentioned me. FYI, I didn't actually get a notification, however, because you didn't sign your post, as explained at Help:Notifications—a technical limitation. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I don't usually forget that. I've belatedly signed them now. Harper J. Cole (talk) 00:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tomlinson

Outstanding work on LaDainian Tomlinson's article! References are clean and from reliable areas. It is a very detailed, yet organized, article. Keep up the great work Red Director (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate you saying that. I'm hoping to get it to FA standard eventually. Harper J. Cole (talk) 18:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of LaDainian Tomlinson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LaDainian Tomlinson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1987 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1987 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 16:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1987 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1987 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1987 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1985 San Diego Chargers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Thankyou for your comment on AN.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - I'm glad it went your way. Harper J. Cole (talk) 17:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1980 San Diego Chargers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruise Brothers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FLC comments

I addressed your comments on List of National Football League annual receptions leaders and left some comments on your FLC of List of Los Angeles Chargers starting quarterbacks. Keep up the good work! Newtothisedit (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of Los Angeles Chargers starting quarterbacks

Congratulations, Harper J. Cole! The list you nominated, List of Los Angeles Chargers starting quarterbacks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of LaDainian Tomlinson

The article LaDainian Tomlinson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:LaDainian Tomlinson for comments about the article, and Talk:LaDainian Tomlinson/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NSNW -- NSNW (talk) 02:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for LaDainian Tomlinson

On 26 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article LaDainian Tomlinson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that LaDainian Tomlinson scored two touchdowns in 47 seconds to break the NFL single-season touchdown record? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/LaDainian Tomlinson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, LaDainian Tomlinson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1980 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1980 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1964 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	Lightning Bolt Barnstar
	For your tireless work on all things Chargers. —Bagumba (talk) 03:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Coryell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friday Harbor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1964 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1964 San Diego Chargers season and Talk:1964 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1980 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1980 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1980 San Diego Chargers season and Talk:1980 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1964 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1964 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article, and Talk:1964 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1980 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1980 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1980 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article, and Talk:1980 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1964 San Diego Chargers season

On 14 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1964 San Diego Chargers season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1964 San Diego Chargers suffered what would be their worst margin of defeat for 56 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1964 San Diego Chargers season. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1964 San Diego Chargers season), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1980 San Diego Chargers season

On 16 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1980 San Diego Chargers season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 1980 San Diego Chargers' John Jefferson, Kellen Winslow and Charlie Joiner became the first trio to earn 1,000 receiving yards each in the same season? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1980 San Diego Chargers season. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1980 San Diego Chargers season), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in WP style

You have an impressive editing record, concentrated in a narrow topic. I've gone the other way, especially in recent years, just gnoming across all subjects. As I mentioned, 99% of my edits go unremarked, but since I did most of my 400,000 or so edits in the last year, that 1% (or less) that gets reacted to can be a burden. Several times the sports fans have taken me to WP:ANI for taking away their precious capital letters. Fortunately, they didn't have any real case and I got off without sanctions, after a couple of scary proposals to muzzle me. I appreciate your support of the spirit of MOS:CAPS and you interest in getting it right. Just don't go too fast like I sometimes do, and you'll probably do fine. Dicklyon (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it's a nice thing about Wikipedia that editors can pick the type of work that suits them. I'll know the right approach when I edit Chargers season articles in future. Harper J. Cole (talk) 19:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's your thinking on "Week n Gamebook"? Is this a work title that should be in title case? Some have lowercase gamebook. In 1964 San Diego Chargers season I downcased Week to match gamebook, but in others I capped both. I'd like to make it consistent, but am unsure what this is since I don't see a link that works for me. Dicklyon (talk) 03:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gamebooks were historically documents that were created by the home team and only released to the media to aid in coverage, though they're published online these days: recent example.

These vary from team to team, but are usually untitled or given a basic title like "Game Summary". The word "gamebook" is a general description of them, so I think lowercase makes sense. Harper J. Cole (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then lowercase week, too, I presume, when it's not the first word. Dicklyon (talk) 15:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd agree with that; it's a description of the document rather than an official title. Harper J. Cole (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:BeanieFan11 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Harper J. Cole to be Editor of the Week. He has totaled around 8,500 edits since registering in December 2020 (one month after me!), many of which have been substantial improvements relating to the Los Angeles/San Diego Chargers. An active member of Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League, he has brought many articles from poor quality to WP:GA (see for example 1961 San Diego Chargers season then and now). He has brought to GA the Chargers seasons of 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 and 2021, for a total of 10 out of 70 Chargers seasons overall (which is impressive considering only 21 other NFL team seasons are GAs, meaning he has nearly a third of all of them!) He also has brought to WP:FL the List of Los Angeles Chargers first-round draft picks and List of Los Angeles Chargers starting quarterbacks, as well as brought to good article status Dan Fouts and LaDainian Tomlinson (plus Don Coryell pending).

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Harper_J._Cole

Editor of the Week
for the week beginning July 9, 2023

8,500 edits since December 2020. Many substantial improvements relating to the Los Angeles/San Diego Chargers. An active member of Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League, bringing many articles from poor quality to WP:GA. Brought the Chargers seasons of 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 and 2021 all to GA. He also has brought to WP:FL the List of Los Angeles Chargers first-round draft picks and List of Los Angeles Chargers starting quarterbacks, as well as brought to good article status Dan Fouts and LaDainian Tomlinson

Recognized for

bringing 10 out of 70 Chargers seasons articles to GA

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 12:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most kind, thank you! Harper J. Cole (talk) 12:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1991 San Diego Chargers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Clayton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1965 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1965 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1965 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1965 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1965 San Diego Chargers season and Talk:1965 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1965 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1965 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1965 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article, and Talk:1965 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Don Coryell

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Don Coryell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Don Coryell

The article Don Coryell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Don Coryell for comments about the article, and Talk:Don Coryell/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1984 San Diego Chargers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Haggerty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Test. Harper J. Cole (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ―Buster7 ☎

Your GA nomination of 1966 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1966 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1966 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1966 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1966 San Diego Chargers season and Talk:1966 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 17:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1966 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1966 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1966 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article, and Talk:1966 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kellen Winslow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Eight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russ Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1992 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1992 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kellen Winslow

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kellen Winslow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kellen Winslow

The article Kellen Winslow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kellen Winslow and Talk:Kellen Winslow/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1992 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1992 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1992 San Diego Chargers season and Talk:1992 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kellen Winslow

The article Kellen Winslow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kellen Winslow for comments about the article, and Talk:Kellen Winslow/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1992 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1992 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1992 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article, and Talk:1992 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dan Fouts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Russ Washington

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Russ Washington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Russ Washington

The article Russ Washington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Russ Washington for comments about the article, and Talk:Russ Washington/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 00:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1975 San Diego Chargers season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1975 San Diego Chargers season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1975 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1975 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1975 San Diego Chargers season and Talk:1975 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1975 San Diego Chargers season

The article 1975 San Diego Chargers season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1975 San Diego Chargers season for comments about the article, and Talk:1975 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 16:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Charlie Joiner

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charlie Joiner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of WikiOriginal-9 -- WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your GA nomination of Charlie Joiner

The article Charlie Joiner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Charlie Joiner for comments about the article, and Talk:Charlie Joiner/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of WikiOriginal-9 -- WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]