User talk:Ghent123
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Ghent123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Win8x. I noticed that you recently removed content from Linda Carter without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I really appreciate your constructive reverts, but please use edit summaries :) win8x (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I was reverting an edit that seemed unconstructive and biased.
- Ghent123 (talk) 21:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, this was a plot description. I can't see how it is biased, but I know nothing about the show. And that's why you use edit summaries; anyway keep up the good work! win8x (talk) 21:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- I figured somebody would revert my edit! I can’t even have an edit up for 3 seconds without getting accused in vandalism! 199.192.122.199 (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. The reason I reverted your edit is that it was non-constructive. I gave you only one warning because you were performing unconstructive edits after getting off a block. Thanks, Ghent123 (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- I figured somebody would revert my edit! I can’t even have an edit up for 3 seconds without getting accused in vandalism! 199.192.122.199 (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, this was a plot description. I can't see how it is biased, but I know nothing about the show. And that's why you use edit summaries; anyway keep up the good work! win8x (talk) 21:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)