User talk:Folksong

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Folksong! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Eckhard Pfeiffer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rolf Eckrodt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuttal

Who are you again? The fact that I have no idea who you are, but you remember me says something... Obviously you obsess over wikipedia a lot more than you claim if you felt the need to come back and insult me. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 14:56, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Test for Wikiproject U2

Test message for Wikiproject U2 to see if the membership list runs properly.
Sent by Pjoef to Miss Bono and Pjoef only. 13:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was my fault. The bot does not recognize the <noinclude> TAG and this message has been sent to all the inactive users of Wikiproject U2. Remove this section whenever you want. Sorry once again. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 14:07, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexis Reich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexis Reich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Reich (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportfan5000 (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

La bande à picsou listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect La bande à picsou. Since you had some involvement with the La bande à picsou redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:Proud USA

Template:Proud USA, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Unused Migrated Userboxes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Proud USA during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Super Chase: Criminal Termination for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super Chase: Criminal Termination is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Chase: Criminal Termination until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

סשס Grimmchild. He/him, probably 12:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]