User talk:Empire2000

As no one seems to have extended an official Wikipedia welcome to you yet, let me belatedly take care of that now. Welcome!

Hello, Empire2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Cheers, -- Infrogmation 04:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

County politicians

Local politicians aren't notable, see WP:BIO. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} ^Sports! 02:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Todd Palin

An article that you have been involved in editing, Todd Palin, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Palin. Thank you. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Leonard Lenihan

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Leonard Lenihan, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Leonard Lenihan seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Leonard Lenihan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Spouses of U.S. Cabinet Members

I have proposed that Category:Spouses of U.S. Cabinet Members which you created, should be renamed. --TommyBoy (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katherine Schweiker

The article Katherine Schweiker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not inherited, not notable on her own

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Empire2000! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 16 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Joseph Charles, Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ramon C. Cortines - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joseph Vacanti - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rebecca Cuddahhee - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Frederick J. Marshall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michael Ranzenhofer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John S. Dyson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Martha Stark - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Whitman (New Jersey) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Leonard Lenihan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Lou Rell 12. Claudia Weicker 13. Jennifer Crawford Glendening 14. Rich Baum 15. David Swarts

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Template:U.S. Senate DSCC Chairs

Template:U.S. Senate DSCC Chairs is being discussed at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. You are invited to comment. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lou Rell

I have nominated Lou Rell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lou Rell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Horologium (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Diane Patrick

I have nominated Diane Patrick, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Patrick. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Horologium (talk) 19:20, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Whitman (New Jersey) for deletion

The article John Whitman (New Jersey) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Whitman (New Jersey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TM 13:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Claudia Weicker

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Claudia Weicker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. TM 23:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrea McNulty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea McNulty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea McNulty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Vacanti

The article Joseph Vacanti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable local politician that fails WP:POLITICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 08:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebecca Cuddahee

The article Rebecca Cuddahee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL's inherent notability guidelines and the WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lynn Marinelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lynn Marinelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Marinelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 07:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leonard Lenihan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonard Lenihan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard Lenihan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 07:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chairmen of the Erie County, NY Legislature

Template:Chairmen of the Erie County, NY Legislature has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ミラ P 00:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denise Sheehan

The article Denise Sheehan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP with no evidence of notability following extensive online search

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Appointed United States senators has been nominated for deletion

Category:Appointed United States senators has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 13:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]