User talk:Darth Kalwejt

Welcome!

Hello, Darth Kalwejt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Davewild 18:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello Darth Kalwejt! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting [[Por tal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board]], joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 23:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lennart Meri‎

Thanks for this edit - this is really Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view at its best! -- Petri Krohn 01:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: John Barrasso picture

The image is from http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2006/members/S27.htm, where he served as state senator. The U.S. Senate is borrowing the image until they can make their own, it would seem. It is most likely not PD, considering the stern copyright warnings on state of Wyoming websites. --Tom (talk - email) 11:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image use

Please do not add fair use images in a decorative manner as you did with Image:Democratslogo.svg here and here. This constitutes a decorative use and is not permitted per terms of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria item #8. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. Thanks, --Durin 15:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Thank you for your edits. Please describe your edits with the Edit Summary box. It is located just above the Save button you use. This makes it easier to understand edits when reading the page's History of edits. Hu 19:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged Vandalism

Thanks for your message. I've looked at the article, and the removal of the link by User:LiveLife isn't vandalism. S/he removed it because it was already linked in the references section. This is supported by the guidance given at WP:EL#References_and_citation which constitutes part of the Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style.

Regardless, this is a content dispute and the usual way we resolve these matters is by discussion. I suggest in future that you talk with this editor about any such disagreements, or open a discussion on the article talk page. Best wishes. --Cactus.man ✍ 17:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Mosleh Zamani

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mosleh Zamani, by Agamemnon2 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mosleh Zamani seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mosleh Zamani, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Someone dedicated to making your day a little bit bette has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Category:Ted Stevens

This category seems like overkill: what do you expect to go in it, besides the 4 (?) articles that are already there?--SarekOfVulcan 17:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please nuke the potential VP candidates list in United States presidential election, 2004?

See Talk:United States presidential election, 2004 -- RobLa 21:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Political positions of Christopher Dodd

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Political positions of Christopher Dodd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 20:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I was a little too eager, and hadn't noticed the other Political Positions of... pages. You're right, it should be fine. — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 21:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to clean up this article, right now its just a carbon copy of ontheissues.org. I'm thinking about nominating it for deletion because of this.--Southern Texas 15:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CaseyRP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CaseyRP.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for Darth Kalwejt: 14% for major edits and 11% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 96 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 17:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Reza Alinejad

Reza Alinejad, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Reza Alinejad satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Alinejad and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Reza Alinejad during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jmlk 1 7 23:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Futurama presidential losers.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Futurama presidential losers.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional United States Independents

Category:Fictional United States Independents, which you created, has been nominated for deletion or renaming. You are invited to participate in the deletion discussion located here. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 00:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional United States Independents

Category:Fictional United States Independents, which you created, has been nominated for deletion or renaming. You are invited to participate in the deletion discussion located here. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 00:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Garret Hobart

Thanks for your work on improving the Garret Hobart page. The older Vice President pages are generally not that high quality, and your work on this one has made a big improvement. Euryalus 23:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of speedy deletion tag

A tag has been placed on Category:Dan Quayle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Category:Dan Quayle is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:Category:Dan Quayle]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Not sure whether you knew about the previous discussion, which was at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_August_27#Category:Dan_Quayle, so here's the link. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 00:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:CSAttGen

Template:CSAttGen has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jmlk 1 7 15:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki

Please don't forget to add interwiki links to Polish articles you translate from pl wikipedia, so they are linked both ways.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 19:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RussellMCunningham.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RussellMCunningham.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Hazel

Hi,

came across the judge John R. Hazel article and wanted to let you know it's a bit garbled at the moment in the middle section. I think I can see what you were trying to say in the middle section (ie Roosevelt had gone climbing rather than sitting around in Buffalo), but I didn't want to just go in and maybe screw it up completely. Thanks! 03:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Longin Pastusiak

Hi, nice work there with the article. We could find a better photo of his some time. And few more info on his American History books. Greetings. --Kochas 14:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit summaries

please use edit summaries when making major changes to articles, as you did on the 2000 election article. thanks. Anastrophe (talk) 20:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Agran presidential campaign, 1992

Please stop creating articles like Larry Agran presidential campaign, 1992, Joe Biden presidential campaign, 1988, Bob Kerrey presidential campaign, 1992, Tom Harkin presidential campaign, 1992, and Paul Tsongas presidential campaign, 1992. These are unencyclopedic and are not helpful. Instead of creating new articles like these expand the election sections in the main articles.--S TX 19:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wallace-LeMay.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wallace-LeMay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. I have witnessed some of your recent edits to the pages George H.W. Bush and Dick Cheney. First off, please make adequate use edit summaries to tell other editors what your revision(s) accomplished. Secondly, the "acting president" clause was determined by myself and another editor to not be particularly notable (or favorable) to be placed in the infobox on those two articles. I removed it in Dick Cheney, then added it back because it really didn't hurt, and another editor removed it on both pages. The more I thought about it, the most the other editor was correct in removing it. It was for a mere day, and although it does deserve mention in the correct section and succession box at the bottom, the lead is too prominent to display such a short and minor event. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrzej Andrzejewski

Hi there, I ran across this article when reviewing Special:Newpages. I haven't marked the page as "patrolled" as I am somewhat uncertain how notable this individual is specifically; however, I suspect the incident in which he died would have far less difficulty meeting the notability threshhold. This is just a suggestion on my part, but perhaps an article on the crash itself, including much of the information you have already compiled here (and with the General's name as a redirect) might be of greater value at this point. Do you have any thoughts on this? Risker (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Thank you for your many fine contributions. I noticed you had added flags to several infoboxes of people. You may not be aware, but WP:MOSFLAG deprecates this use as it is redundant (adds no information) and may draw unneeded emphasis to the nationality of the subject. Best wishes to you, --John (talk) 02:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding infoboxes to politicians' articles. As a second remind please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags) before adding any more flagicons into biographical infoboxes. In particular read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags)#Not for use in locations of birth and death. Aspects (talk) 17:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Carter cover time.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Carter cover time.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carter cover time.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Carter cover time.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral histories

Hello Darth Kalwejt, and thank you for your many contributions to Wikipedia. There are a few issues I would like to address, however, regarding some content you have added to many articles: electoral histories. I am largely opposed to them, because they do not offer much to the articles and draw each article out substantially, depending on how many elections he/she has been involved in. Furthermore, the proper citation usage is not enacted in any of them (see Wikipedia:Citation templates); it is very strenuous to go through every lone url link and convert it to the proper format. And they are all lists with absolutely no engaging prose.

While I am not opposed to the idea of presenting the percentage of votes for each of the candidates, it should be done in the text of the corresponding section in an article (thus eliminating the list), and does not need to include every single election the candidate was involved in; I was expecting to see "High School ASB" on the list! They should only include the major elections or a notable election, and every revision should include a citation in proper format.

Don't get me wrong - I am not chastising you. I value your many Wiki contributions and thank you for them. But I think these long lists of every election the candidate has participated in is utterly unnecessary. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 06:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, have you not read my above post? You just inserted the full electoral history to the George H. W. Bush article in a collapsable format (better), but without full citations in proper cite format, and the result of your revison has extended the article size about 8 KB. That's a huge number. Please respond to me so tht we can discuss how to proceed further with electoral histories. Thanks. Happyme22 (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. I'm sorry if I came across harshly; I surely did not intend to. Yes, I think seperate electoral history articles are the way to go, such as the one you provided. I can start moving some of them to seperate articles, and would you like to do the same? Then we have to choose what format to use because consistency is good. There's the one in Electoral history of Eliot Spitzer in table format with colors, and there's the one in George H. W. Bush#Electoral history. I think the chart form would be best if we are to move them into seperate articles; what do you think? Happyme22 (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I created the Electoral history of George H. W. Bush page from all the information you had placed on the president's article (although I think that a table format like the one on Electoral history of Eliot Spitzer might be better). User:SnowFire said on my talk page that creating sub articles for presidents would be a good idea, but that we should hold off on Congressmen. Feel free to join in. Happyme22 (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kulongoski

Hi Derek, that's an interesting point re: Ted Kulongoski and presidential delegates, and not something I've heard before. You woldn't happen to have a citation for it, would you? -Pete (talk) 04:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reagan electoral history

I'm just wondering, if you have some free time and happen to be bored, an electoral history of President Ronald Reagan is needed. I think you made one once, but I've looked through the article history and haven't found it. Anyway, if you do get around to making one, if you could please present it on my talk page that would be great. Thanks a lot, Happyme22 (talk) 05:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - I think you might enjoy this. I was at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in California, USA in July 2007 and I saw the President of Poland, Lech Kaczyński, present the Order of the White Eagle to first lady Nancy Reagan. I came about an arm's length away from shaking his hand in the crowd; it was a great day. I'm not sure how you feel about Pres. Kaczyński, but I thought that I might share that with you :) --Hap

Excellent! I'm glad to hear that we are making progress. Indeed, President Kaczyński's idea to present the award to Reagan was a tabular one. Again, I'm sorry if I came across harshly when I first contacted you as I certainly didn't intend to; I value your many Wikipedia contributions and Electoral history "crusade" :) --Happyme22 (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful! The only thing I would try to remember is consistency, so if you want tables, do tables for everything; if you want lists, do lists for everything, etc. Great job! Happyme22 (talk) 20:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from George W. Bush. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Diligent Terrier^{and friends} 00:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ekipa (TV Series)

Witaj! Chciałbym bardzo nieśmiało zasugerować, że "Ekipa" ma swój oficjalny tytuł angielski i brzmi on "Prime Minister". Pod takim tytułem producent serialu, ATM Grupa S.A., zaprezentował go na międzynarodowych targach telewizyjnych MIPCOM w Cannes w październiku 2007 (źródło: [1]). Dlatego postulowałbym zmianę tytułu artykułu. Pozdrawiam! Powerek38 (talk) 13:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:37 Warren.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:37 Warren.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:39 Johns.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:39 Johns.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:47 Martinez.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:47 Martinez.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:49 Mackay.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:49 Mackay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Michale DiSalle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Michale DiSalle.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —BorgHunter (talk) 04:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie

Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 1960

In this article there seems to be a contradiction about Florida. It is listed not in the first list of thirteen states with primaries, but it is listed in the fourteen states by winner. Which list is accurate?

--MathMan64 (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African American United States presidential candidates

Thanks for creating it! Шизомби (talk) 17:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

The material you're adding to infoboxes of political figures regarding presidential campaign nominees is confusing to readers and not in the usual style of the encyclopedia. "Succession" boxes don't work for nominees - for example, it is not clear to say that Bob Dole was succeeded by George HW Bush as VP nominee - we use "preceded by" and "succeeded by" to indicate actual offices held by individuals. Being a nominee is not a job or a position. Perhaps you should ~~ask the editors of individual pages~~ discuss this with other editors for their opinions before adding this across the board. I've raised it on some talkpages already. Tvoz/talk 23:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further thoughts: this is also inherently unbalanced because, for example, George W. Bush does not mention being the nominee in 2000 and 2004, so his opponents are not listed, yet on John Kerry and Al Gore we're told that Bush was the opponent. The whole thing is confusing and not in the encyclopedia's style - we use infoboxes only to list actual positions held, and even then, the most recent ones, in reverse chronological order, and sometimes eliminating early less important positions for style and readability. Your additions to infoboxes are likely well-intentioned, but I think they are problematic and should be reverted. Tvoz/talk 22:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darth - thanks for the reply. I am not talking about succession boxes - the ones that are placed on the bottom of pages - I am talking about the infoboxes that are on the top right of the pages. I myself don't like succession boxes, but they can be hidden with the hide/show button, so people who like them can see them and people who don't can leave them compressed and essentially hidden. That's fine - not a problem. But the infoboxes - the ones that cannot be compressed or hidden, but give basic information about the subject - have always shown only actual positions held, in reverse chronological order with the most recent on top. The "Nominee" fields just don't work properly - they are out of chronological order and are inherently confusing. And note what I said about the imbalance between George Bush and JOhn Kerry, for example - why does Kerry's infobox tell us that Bush was his opponent, but Bush's infobox says nothing about Gore or Kerry? The point is that being a nominee is not a "position held", and it is "positions held" that are in the up-top infoboxes. I am not proposing changing the succession bars across the bottom of pages, but I do plan to remove the "Nominee" fields from the infoboxes on the top of pages.. Tvoz/talk 00:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominee/Candidate section of {{Infobox Officeholder}}

There is a discussion about the Nominee/Candidate section of {{Infobox Officeholder}} you might be interested in adding to, see Template talk:Infobox Officeholder#Nominee/Candidate section. --Philip Stevens (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

Hello Darth Kalwejt,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 22:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.
You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.
Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.

Help us get the project off the ground and flying.

Proposed deletion of Robert V. Somers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robert V. Somers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cheers, CP 01:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Robert V. Somers

An article that you have been involved in editing, Robert V. Somers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert V. Somers. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Cheers, CP 00:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional governors of U.S. states

Category:Fictional governors of U.S. states, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 20:04, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Achtung!

Hello, I just redirected your recent article about a Prussian politician to Adolf zu Hohenlohe-Ingelfingen, which already existed. Regards, De728631 (talk) 15:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) De728631 (talk) 15:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Singing

Hopefully, Biden, Church & Sadat didn't sing the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty? Cronos1 (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have been more direct. You described Biden, Church & Sadat singing the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty, when I believe you meant signing;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cronos1 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits made on September 20, 2008 (UTC) to Joseph Goebbels

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joseph Goebbels, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 72.75.98.105 (talk) 02:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox {Current Germany states Minister Presidents}

Lol, let me say, a few days before, I just thought about to create {Current Germany states Minister Presidents} myself. Thank you for doing so. Sebastian scha. (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CollinsTIME.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CollinsTIME.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 06:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CarterTIMECover1994.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CarterTIMECover1994.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Clinton Tsongas.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Clinton Tsongas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LeaderTIME.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LeaderTIME.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MillsTIME.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MillsTIME.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Clinton Tsongas.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Clinton Tsongas.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 21:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A personal question

Hello, Darth. Have you ever tried to inquire for the possible Prussian Lithuanian origin of your surname, which quite probably derives from "a blacksmith" (kalwis)? Iulius (talk) 06:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Stevens

Please do not alter Ted Stevens as a former senator until Janaury 6. He is still the incumbent right now. Thanks.Saberwolf116 (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:United States political leader templates

There is some discussion of the format of templates in Category:United States political leader templates such as {{Current Speakers of U.S. state Houses of Representatives}} going on at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#State_by_state_100.2C000_population_city_and_mayors_templates. Feel free to discuss.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Norm Coleman

I did a little clean up on your editing in the Norm Coleman article in terms of grammar. Davidpdx (talk) 06:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Electoral results by candidate

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Electoral results by candidate, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Electoral results by candidate has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Electoral results by candidate, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit

Hi,

In your recent edit, you added Ali Khamenei as president of Iran in infobox, instead of Mahmoud ahmadinejad. I corrected your edit. Perhaps you did not know that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is Iran's president and Ayatollah Khamenei is Iran's leader. Thank you for your contribution. --Parvazbato59 (talk) 03:41, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth missing vs Year of birth missing

Hi. Concerning this edit of your and probably others I would like to inform that for article pages we use Category:Year of birth missing and not Category:Date of birth missing. The latter has to be placed in discussion pages only. Please read instructions in the catogories' talk pages. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries please!

You've been asked several times over a span of nearly two years to please provide edit summaries. Someone even produced statistics. But your last 15 edits have no edit summaries at all.

When you make an edit such as this without an edit summary, it looks very much like vandalism and requires additional effort by all those who watch the article to verify yours was a helpful edit. In this case, most editors would have provided a summary similar to split electoral history to separate article. This tells everyone in an instant that you didn't thoughtlessly remove content, and sets an expectation of the complexity of the diff. Thanks. —EncMstr (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Byrd on TIME

I replaced File:ByrdTIME.jpg with a free picture and nominated it for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ByrdTIME.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ByrdTIME.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of current Vice Presidents

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of current Vice Presidents. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current Vice Presidents. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For the enormous array of articles you have created. Jatkins ^{(talk - contribs)} 18:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Darth Kalwejt! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 14 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Andrey Panteleyevich Manoylov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Todd Strange (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gerhard Dörfler - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Andrzej Celiński - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jolanta Danielak - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jan Król - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Krzysztof Putra - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Krzysztof Pusz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michał Janiszewski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stanisław Iwanicki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Tomasz Mamiński 12. Clark Gruening 13. Jan Klimek

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Fob james.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fob james.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fob james.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fob james.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maryland special gubernatorial election

I see you created Maryland special gubernatorial election, 1970. The election actually took place on January 7 1969 (as confirmed by the reference source at the end of the article), so should be Maryland special gubernatorial election, 1969. Are you able to correct this? 86.141.46.179 (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Devan eva.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Devan eva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jazz cutscene.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jazz cutscene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 10:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Holiday hare jazz 1.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Holiday hare jazz 1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:JohnPattersonTIME.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JohnPattersonTIME.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:John patterson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John patterson.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John patterson.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John patterson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United States presidential election, 1992

Hi there. I see that you created this template back in 2008: I was wondering if you could explain something about it to me. Why was there a list of Democratic vice-presidential candidates, when there was no formal list of them or public contest for the vice presidential nomination? I have removed all of them other than Al Gore, as I don't see the reason behind that list. If it's just a list of people who were reported as being possible vice-presidential nominations, I don't think it belongs on the template. I notice that some other similar presidential election templates do the same thing, but I thought I'd ask about this one before making changes to the rest.

(If you're wondering: I noticed this by seeing the template on the article Bob Graham, and wondering 'what is that doing there?'.) Robofish (talk) 00:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bob Barr

Template:Bob Barr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Larry Peterson

The article Larry Peterson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable voice over artist known for one single minor role.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. magnius (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrey Panteleyevich Manoylov

The article Andrey Panteleyevich Manoylov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:V. Claims to have been acting chairman of a breakaway state, but no sources are provided to support this and I can't find any references to this individual apart from Wikipedia mirrors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:DSCCChairs

A tag has been placed on Template:DSCCChairs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:NixonMcGov.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NixonMcGov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Angus Wheeler McDonald

The article Angus Wheeler McDonald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual; fails WP:POLITICIAN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. William S. Saturn (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Franciszek Trabalski

Hello, please have a look at: Franciszek Trabalski. best regards --Bernd Rieke (talk) 12:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CSAPresidents

Template:CSAPresidents has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jenks24 (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Governor Mark O. Hatfield (R-OR).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Governor Mark O. Hatfield (R-OR).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 21:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capital punishment in Kansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perry Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burns on the 19th century woodcut.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Burns on the 19th century woodcut.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orrin Hatch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Leahy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dean of the United States Senate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard B. Russell

Joe Donnelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chris Murphy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited President of Brazil, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Catarina and Castelo Branco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subcategorizing Category:People executed under the Stuarts

I am considering effectively splitting-by-subcategorizing Category:People executed under the Stuarts by England/Scotland/Ireland, because at it stands, the categorization effectively suggests that someone executed under the Stuarts was executed by England and Scotland and Ireland, which is not quite true. I wonder if you would have any objections to it. (Effectively, there would be Category:People executed by Stuart England, Category:People executed by Stuart Scotland, and Category:People executed by Stuart Ireland — with the latter not happening if there aren't enough people executed under the Stuarts in their roles as monarchs of Ireland.) --Nlu (talk) 21:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James D. Kimmel

The article James D. Kimmel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Epeabody.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Epeabody.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liljim folsom.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Liljim folsom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Izabella Sierakowska

Thanks for contributing to the article Izabella Sierakowska. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. 62.64.152.154 (talk) 22:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lloyd W. Bailey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lloyd W. Bailey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd W. Bailey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of W. F. Turner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W. F. Turner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. F. Turner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USSenateLeaders

Template:USSenateLeaders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 08:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Scheelwalter.JPG

The file File:Scheelwalter.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused crop

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Electoral history of Earl Warren

Hi I wanted to let you know that I have proposed this article for deletion. The reason is that the content of the article has already been included as a section in the main article [{Earl Warren]]. All the best Mccapra (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susan Parker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Parker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Parker (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pacino roycohn.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pacino roycohn.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jimmy L. Glass

The article Jimmy L. Glass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been tagged for having poor referencing since 2011, and no real attempt seems to have been made to improve it. The existing references are extremely poor (two are just execution statistics, one is a collection of poorly-cited newspaper articles) and it's not clear why this person was notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stuart Starky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuart Starky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Starky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Heads of State of the Free City of Danzig

Template:Heads of State of the Free City of Danzig has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kochas (talk) 17:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bob Barr

Template:Bob Barr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jimmy L. Glass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy L. Glass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy L. Glass until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glass v. Louisiana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glass v. Louisiana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glass v. Louisiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of living former United States senators for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of living former United States senators is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of living former United States senators until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Heads of State of the Free City of Danzig

Template:Heads of State of the Free City of Danzig has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Executed Roman women has been nominated for renaming

Category:Executed Roman women has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 15:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Woods (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Woods (politician), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Woods (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrzej Andrzejewski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrzej Andrzejewski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrzej Andrzejewski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Macktheknifeau (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of First Cabinet of Waldemar Pawlak

The article First Cabinet of Waldemar Pawlak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject explored as part of Pawlak biography and Oleksy cabinet (WP:NOPAGE). Not a cabinet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Antoni12345 (talk) 20:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of First Premiership of Waldemar Pawlak

The article First Premiership of Waldemar Pawlak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject explored as part of Pawlak biography and Oleksy cabinet (WP:NOPAGE). Not a cabinet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Preston Parks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Preston Parks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston Parks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBritinator (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gwenyfred Bush

The article Gwenyfred Bush has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NPOL. Contested two elections unsuccessfully, no evident citations or news coverage beyond this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]