User talk:Charlesdrakew/Archives/2012/August
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Charlesdrakew. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
SOLA2012
Hi man
i just need your help the User talk:Dan56
keep remove facts from an article
the article about nicki minaj album Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded
the issue about the album slaes , her album has sold million copies in usa alone according to RIAA not me ok ....
and i put more than one score i put the RIAA one and another site too which is also reliable score ...
and he climed and kept saying that RIAA is not a score ....... etc
so i will give you the scores and please do something about it because the only thing that he is good at just removing.
and this is score 2
http://nickieleaks.com/nicki-minajs-pink-friday-roman-reloaded-certified-platinum-in-the-us/
thanks ..... --sola$$$$$$$$ (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Discuss it on the article talkpage.--Charles (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Geo Q's
1)Why is weathring so important to Human Economic Activites?
2)How can recent lava flows be colonised by plants a few years after an eruption??
- Hi Shamel. I think you need the Reference desk.--Charles (talk) 08:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
About the Transdev York guy
I emailed the company, and they said Josh does not work for the company, though he used to bother a lady who works in the office. Seeing how his sockpuppetry goes pretty deep and he's been impersonating Transdev York to their detriment, and may go back for years, I'm wondering if we need to do more than play whack-a-mole. I don't know if this qualifies for Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse (seeing how it's limited to a few types of articles), but it might open the door to a "block on sight" deal, right?
Also, I nominated Bus Services in York for deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting. Thanks for pointing this out Ian. I suppose it will still take about the same time to be sure that new socks really are socks. I am really busy with work at the moment but I may file areport if abuse continues.--Charles (talk) 21:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. Good luck with work. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
The Tea Leaf - Issue Five
Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!
- Guest activity increased in July. Questions are up from an average of 36 per week in June to 43 per week in July, and guest profile creation has also increased. This is likely a result of the automatic invite experiments we started near the end of month, which seeks to lessen the burden on hosts and other volunteer who manually invite editors. During the last week of July, questions doubled in the Teahouse! (But don't let that deter you from inviting editors to the Teahouse, please, there are still lots of new editors who haven't found Teahouse yet.)
- More Teahouse hosts than ever. We had 12 new hosts sign up to participate at the Teahouse! We now have 35 hosts volunteering at the Teahouse. Feel free to stop by and see them all here.
- Phase two update: Host sprint. In August, the Teahouse team plans to improve the host experience by developing a simpler new-host creation process, a better way of surfacing active hosts, and a host lounge renovation. Take a look at the plan and weigh in here.
- New Teahouse guest barnstar is awarded to first recipient: Charlie Inks. Using the Teahouse barnstar designed by Heatherawalls, hosts hajatvrc and Ryan Vesey created the new Teahouse Guest Barnstar. The first recipient is Charlie Inks, for her boldness in asking questions at the Teahouse. Check out the award in action here.
- Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania! The Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania this past month, where editor retention and interface design was heavily discussed. Sarah and Jonathan presented the Teahouse during the Wikimedia Fellowships panel. Slides can be viewed here. A lunch was also held at Wikimania for Teahouse hosts.
As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. SarahStierch (talk) 08:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
RD's article
Hello. I would like you to attend the discussion in the talk page. The issue is whether it is a good idea to keep Dawkins' 9/11 statement along with the due criticism or not.--Kazemita1 (talk) 00:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)