Jump to content

User talk:Cassiopeia/Archive 74

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 70←Archive 72Archive 73Archive 74Archive 75Archive 76→Archive 80

Tech News: 2022-02

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 January. It will be on all wikis from 13 January (calendar).

Events

  • Community Wishlist Survey 2022 begins. All contributors to the Wikimedia projects can propose for tools and platform improvements. The proposal phase takes place from 10 January 18:00 UTC to 23 January 18:00 UTC. Learn more.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Distructive Edit Reverts

Hi,

You recently reverted it edit I made and did so within less than 10 seconds. I don’t understand the motivation. Does it really make you feel better to go around destroying peoples’ contributions? For some reason Wikipedia wouldn’t allow me to add a citation when I initially added the content and I found 10 seconds later when I went to go edit it again to add the citation that you had already deleted it. Do some people really feel so badly about themselves that they need to go around policing everyone on Wikipedia in order to feel better? Or to make bots to do the same? 108.250.76.89 (talk) 03:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

There's no deadline, and your work is saved in the article's revision history. Just add it again, with a source this time. And try not to be rude to other editors who are merely following Wikipedia policy on reliable sources. ––FormalDude talk 03:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC) (talk page watcher)
@108.250.76.89: Hi, Wikipedia always allow the editor to add the source. I am one of the counter vandalism trainer in English Wikipedia and it is part of my work to monitor the edits in Wikipedia. This was your edit and you didnt provide and indepedent, reliable (IRS) source to support your contain claim. You are welcome to add the information back provided you can provide an inline citation to support the info. You can use the horizontal format of Template:Cite web if the source is from the web. Cassiopeia talk 03:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
I’m not being rude. The person that removed this within 10 seconds, is. There’s a lot of arrogance amongst Wikipedia editors and it’s likely that those who have been on for a while are so steeped in it themselves that they don’t realize it. Are citations needed for this claim? They certainly exist.
@108.250.76.89: I know you are not being rude but may be frustrated. I believe there are some arrogance editors in Wikipedia as we have millions of editors in Wikipedia and the probability could be some of them are a little bit arrogance but I am not one of them. I added the message in your talk page is to educate you of Wikipedia guidlines and point you to the page which you can find further info/correction for the edit your made. The Wikipedia core policy is verifiability and the editor who changed or added the info need to provide the source to support the claim - see WP:PROVEIT and WP:BURDEN. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 03:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

You are the destructive not me

You can not judge me I am destructing the pages. If you have any knowledge about the topic and different opinions, then I can discuss with you. But you do not want to do it. If you do not come to discuss or block my IP, I will not allow you to revert my changing. 188.119.60.128 (talk) 03:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

@188.119.60.128: There are several editors have informed you of your edits where you removed the sourced content and you have continued to edit in the same fashion and that is destructive. Wikipedia is not about my or your opinions but all about verification. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked. Cassiopeia talk 04:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Then allow the neo-nazis or jihadists to write their radical thoughts on Wikipedia. Do not be hypocrites. Everbody knows you. Wikipedia is a garbage of politics. Come and block my ip. 188.119.60.128 (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
@188.119.60.128: You need to provide source to support your claim and you will be blocked for vandalized the article and violation of 3rr. Cassiopeia talk 04:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
While Wikipedia tries to maintain a neutral point of view, that does not mean that all positions must be given equal weight. This is further expounded upon at WP:DUE. xRENEGADEx (talk | contribs) 04:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
The proof is the source itself. Where is the denaturalization papers? How did that guy find that numbers? Which one of the Turkish law is racial? Where is the official statement says that do not allow the jews to come? Show me! 188.119.60.128 (talk) 04:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
@188.119.60.128: My talk page is not the right venue to discussion the article but the article talk page. You can go there if you wish but not kept on reverting the edit for you have violated the r33 guidelines which you had been warned but choose to do so.. Cassiopeia talk 04:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
I can re-edit the page with thousands of possible combinations. As you know r33 guidelines is totally awkward. 188.119.60.128 (talk) 04:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
@188.119.60.128: Every editor needs to follow Wikipedia guidelines if they want to edit Wikipedia which the content need to be WP:V by WP:IS, WP:RS, no copy right violation, in WP:DUE, WP:BALANCE, WP:NPOV just to name some and not violate some Wikipedia guidelines when editing. You have been informed several times by several editors of not removing the content and do not commit to 3rr and you have violated both. Cassiopeia talk 05:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
@188.119.60.128: You have been blocked for 72hrs which is a short block and when the block is lifted, pls edit constructively and follow the Wikipedia guidelines and if you continue to edit the same fashion as you did, you will be blocked longer.08:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:MMA Lab

Hi. I updated the article on this gym. Added a bit more info and a few more sources that aren't pure interviews (interview parts won't be used in the article anyway).
Is it ok now? -Imcdc (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Imcdc Sorry, I thought I have replied your message and apparently I didnt as I saw your article on the new page and in my opinion it doesnt pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. I have AfD it and see what other editors say about the article. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 22:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


Draft:Fight Ready

Hi. Got another gym article. See if this is ok? -Imcdc (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Imcdc Sorry, I thought I have replied your message and apparently I didnt as I saw your article on the new page and in my opinion it doesnt pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. I have AfD it and see what other editors say about the article. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 22:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #503

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Discussions
    • Open request for adminship: MSGJ (RfP scheduled to end after 20 January 2022 17:45 UTC)
  • Development
    • Fixed an issue where making changes with sitelinks were not fully dispatched to the clients (phab:T233520)
    • Mismatch Finder: Improved the texts in the tool to be more understandable after testing
    • Mismatch Finder: added a way to get statistics about all the reviews that have been done in the tool and what is still awaiting review
    • Special:NewLexeme: kicked off the development work to improve the page in order to make it more understandable

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.


Hope all is well!

Hi Cassiopeia, we haven't interacted or crossed paths since the NPP School so I thought I'd drop by and see what you are up to! I hope all is well at your end and you've had fantastic holidays! Thank you again for the mentorship opportunity - it was very useful! nearlyevil665 07:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

nearlyevil665 Good day. It is always warm my heart when I see one of my pass students drop by and says hello. I am well as always and manage to get my guitar from the storage and start practicing again. I hope you are doing well wherever you are and do stay safe. Best. Cassiopeia talk 03:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-03

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 January. It will be on all wikis from 20 January (calendar).

Events

  • Community Wishlist Survey 2022 continues. All contributors to the Wikimedia projects can propose for tools and platform improvements. The proposal phase takes place from 10 January 18:00 UTC to 23 January 18:00 UTC. Learn more.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

KnightOfHylia, "Monique Heart" page edit

Hello,

I received a message that my edit on this page has been removed but it seems to have remained the same. What would be a proper citation for this? The person in real life has changed their stage name for the drag queen persona from "Monique Heart" to "Mo Heart."

I could cite it from a YouTube video, Drag Race Fan Wiki Page, or article. What would be preferred?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KnightOfHYlia (talk • contribs) 02:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

KnightOfHYlia, Good day. First of all pls read WP:COMMONNAME to make sure the new name adhere to the guidelines prior changing the name in the lead section (intro) and the article name. Secondly, utube and all social media are considered not reliable sources and can NOT be used to support the info changed/added. You need to find independent, reliable sources such as from the newspapers. Pls use horizontal format of Template:Citeweb if the sources are from the web. Pls see more Wikipedia guidelines on the welcome message which I have placed in your talk page. Cassiopeia talk 02:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Ilia Topuria German?

Provide the proof that Ilia Topuria is German. He has Georgian and Spanish passports. He is ethnically Georgian, what you are doing is vandalism. Lemabeta (talk) 00:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Lemabeta You didnt provide source to support the claim. He was born and raised in Germany and that is well sourced. Again, I have informed you I have commented on the article talk page. Pls discussion in one talk page and not your talk, my talk page and the article talk page. Pls go to the article talk page.00:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

In reference to the edit you reverted, the only sources I used were the ones already present, aside from the three blogs which I removed for not being good sources, as described in my edit summary. I don't believe I added any new information that would require new sources given the entirety of my edit was removing text sourced to unreliable sources and then fixing the subsequent mess that would have made of the section. 108.174.175.69 (talk) 03:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

@108.174.175.69: Ok, you can add back the info you had added but you need to provide independent, reliable source. Cassiopeia talk 03:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I feel you may not understand what I meant. I didn't add new information, my edit was removing information that was taken from unreliable sources as well as the sources themselves. The only new addition to the article made by my edit was a different introductory sentence summarizing the first part of the section and replacing the one that I had deleted. Is there anything specific that I wrote that you believe required a new source? 108.174.175.69 (talk) 04:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
@108.174.175.69: I see and thank for the explanation again. I will revert the edits. Cassiopeia talk 04:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much, I'm sorry for the confusion and if I wasn't making myself clear. 108.174.175.69 (talk) 05:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
@108.174.175.69: No worries. Thank you for your contribution and I do hope you will register/create an account. Stay safe and happy editing. Cassiopeia talk 05:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Re:Institute for Economics and Peace

Hi, Responding about your message regarding my work on this page. If you check the longer revision history on the page you'll see that I did explain what I was doing which was "Moved material about awards from lead section to newly created subsection. Edited out some info about where launches took place in past years and adressed some other minor issues flagged by others" The reason this probably wasn't clear is that this material didn't immediately show up as I'd wanted it too and I had to add a lot more revisions because I was having an issue with actually doing that I kept on getting a "Cite error: A [1] (see the help page)." so as I was submitting very similar things multiple times to try to figure out how to get rid of that error I did not always post the full explanation. I have now solved the problem and was in the midst of finalizing this new section when you reverted it. I do think that taking this information out of the lead is more in fitting with the standards of Wikipedia but if you disagree I don't have strong feelings about it. Do you agree with me about moving the material down? KNY22 (talk) 04:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ tag is missing the closing
KNY22 Good day and thank you for the message. These are your edits. Two things here. (1) You have removed sourced content (2 paragraph) without explanation. (2) You added unsourced content on the "External Recognition". Information added or changed needs to be supported by independent, reliable sources such as from major newspapers. You can use the horizontal format of Template:Cite Web if the sources are from the web. You need to be provide hist diff so I may know the error you stated (I think you didnt include the closing tag without the hist diff provided). I have placed a welcome message on your talk page and see more Wikipedia guidelines for your familiarity of them. Cassiopeia talk 04:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
As I've already explained I was moving those 2 paragraphs of the article not removing them and I was not adding ANY unsourced content. When you interrupted my worked I had figured out that something about the moving of the source code for the citations was not workings so I had already made one of them active by recreating it and was in the process of doing that for the other. I agree that it would not be acceptable to take out sources. But as I said and if you look at the changes I've made I'm not introducing any content I'm merely moving some of it to a more appropriate location and reshaping or removing some other small sentences to address the template on top of article that suggest it reads like an ad (as I did note in my edit notes). KNY22 (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
KNY22 when moving the sourced content, do it in one edit. You are welcome to copyedit the article. Btw. pls add an additional ":" from the previous message for one right indentation as this is the communication protocol in talk pages (I have added them for you). Happy editing. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

CVUA (Counter Vandalism Unit Academy) Student Admission Request

Hi, Cassiopeia. I am Iloveguppy, a relatively new user of Wikipedia. I have recently been interested in becoming a member of the counter vandalism unit and have made 200+ edits. Since you are a trainer for CVUA, Wonder if you could accept me as one of your students.

Hope to hear from you soon.Iloveguppy 12:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Iloveguppy Thank you for interested in the CVUA program. The min main space edits to join the program is 200 and currently you have only 50 - see here. I have sent you a welcome message, pls read the links provided so you may understand some basic Wikipedia guidelines and maybe you can start helping in Wikipedia:Basic copyediting areas. When you have over 200 mainspace edit and you still want to join the program then pls pop back here. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Citations

Good morning Cassiopeia. I received your message this morning and began to re-enter my changes with citatations to ahigh quality review article. Could you let me know why you are still deleting the edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pskroenung (talk • contribs) 13:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Pskroenung Good day and thank you for the question. Pls provide the article name next time so I may know which article you was referring to. This were your edits where you added unsourced content which I reverted them. This-2 were your edits which you added the sources except one sentence and User:Mako001 reverted your edit and not me - see here-3. You can add back the sourced info but not the one without. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Anne Hamburger

When another user admits they were mistaken to put a message on my page and undoes the reversion of my changes they made I find it curious that you would then add the promotion flag back to my page on your own. Why? The only change I made after that was actually to try to address the message you had sent me by changing one sentence to a more neutral version that i had proposed to you in the message you left me on the other users talk page. It was an attempt at consensus building and good faith on my part to do so. I would like to know what material you believe I added that was promotional? Meanwhile in the changes you've made to the site you've added in a spelling error to the last name of the subject and also an inaccuracy about the awardsKNY22 (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC).

KNY22 Thank you for the message above and understand your frustration. I understand there are a lot of things you might not understand since you have 50 total main space edit where your first edit was a week ago. I understand your good faith and appreciate your wrote to the other editor that is the reason why I stated my commented there. No all editors understand the Wikipeida guidelines and even when consensus agreed is agreed it might not fit the Wikipedia guidelines for they dont know/understand the guidelines. (1) Neutral point of view - "under her leadership do enhance the subject value and that is considered "peacocking" which is not neutral point of view and promote the value of the subject, as how would one knows it is all here afford that the company won the award/recognition? (2) the two sources your provided (1) engardearts is considered not independent source is not Pindependent to the subject and also not reliable for it is the company website and not from a major newspaper with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy ; and time out is not a reliable source either and I nominated the article to be AfDed. I removed the unsourced sentences and even with the 2 sources left, there are still not reliable sources. (3) If the there is spelling mistake or inaccuracy about the award (as long as it is supported by the source) then you are welcome to copyedit it. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
If you look closely at the edit history you will see the the sentences to which you are referring are ones I did not put in or even alter. The only things I did to the article were to change the sentences about the mission to correct the fact that it was factually wrong and add the sentence about awards. As such I would appreciate you taking the note off my page. However I am not going to touch her page again as clearly you disagree with me and seem to be policing my work. However I thought you'd want to know that you spelled Anne Hamburger's name wrong in the changes you made. I have also contested your listing the page to be deleted as I think you are being very hasty in saying this, just because the current article is not well sourced does not mean she is not notable and does not have many verifiable independent mentions. She does the five I listed are just the top ones that came up. I don't think female entries should be listed for deletion without due diligence. KNY22 (talk) 07:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
KNY22 When you add mission of a company that is promo. You can contest as you please if you can give support of evident the subject is notable as per Wikipedia guidelines. Cassiopeia talk 07:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
I did not ADD the mission it was already there I CORRECTED it. KNY22 (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
KNY22 OK, next time when you see mission in any thing due with a company or a person remove it from the article instead of copyediting it. I understand your frustration, and I am not here to against you but to help you and provide you info of Wikipedia guard lines. To learn about Wikipedia do take a very long time. I remember I sat down in front of my computer for 6 weeks most nights just reading about the guidelines and let alone know how to apply it. All of us going through this. The messages on your talk page is to educate you about the guidelines. And lastly, everyone makes mistakes including I and we just learn from it. Stay safe. Cassiopeia talk 07:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Correction of the list of candidates so that it is in fact in alphabetical order ie Haggar, Holland, Kotsvoy. Addition of Greens candidate's name. Improved wording for candidate's profession

Hello, I received a message that my edit was removed because I did not cite a source. My edit was correcting the alphabetical order of a list of names. The page states that the list is in alphabetical order but it is not. There are 3 names listed in the order: Kotsvoy, Holland and Haggar. Alphabetically it should be Haggar, Holland, Kotsvoy. This should not require a source. It is the alphabet.(Kaylenesmith 22/01/22)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaylenesmith (talk • contribs) 8:00, January 22, 2022 (UTC)

Kaylenesmith, Good day. All info added or changes need to supported by independent, reliable source - see WP:PROVEIT and you had since add the source - see here and I have added the close tag - see here-2. I have sent you a welcome message and kindly read the link for you to familiar with some of the Wikipedia guardlines. Welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. Cassiopeia talk 07:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Rampage

Hi Cass. I have been trying to stop a dispute so went for a compromise. It did seem to be working. This edit, though, shows a potential issue. Rafael again restores his preferred version. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1067193685&oldid=1067155542&title=Quinton_Jackson NEDOCHAN (talk) 09:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

NEDOCHAN I saw the discussion you had wiht Rafael and also Rafael has open a discussion in the article talk page, so let keep the discussion in one place at the article talk page and I will comment there. Stay safe and best.21:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Air transports of heads of state and government - Seychelles

Hello Cassiopeia. In my change there was a link to the official source. Look carefully please. And I have a request for you - please return the edit. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Alexander. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Александр Петрук (talk • contribs) 05:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Александр Петрук This are your edits which I have reverted. You can add back the info that is sourced but not the info that is unsourced. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. Cassiopeia talk 05:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #504

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Discussions
    • Closed request for adminship: MSGJ (Successful). Welcome onboard \o/
  • Tool of the week
    • Comparator compare the list of cited entities across two different wikipedia articles using Wikidata and SPARQL
  • Development
    • Enabling usage tracking specifically for statements on Waray, Armenian and Cebuano Wikipedias (phab:T296383, phab:T296382, phab:T296384)
    • Implementing basic version of mul language code and deploying it to Test Wikidata (phab:T297393)
    • Preparing an event centered on reusing Wikidata's data
    • Mismatch Finder: Been in touch with people who can potentially provide the first mismatches to load into the new tool for the launch. Finalized the statistics part.

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.


Tech News: 2022-04

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 January. It will be on all wikis from 27 January (calendar).
  • The following languages can now be used with syntax highlighting: BDD, Elpi, LilyPond, Maxima, Rita, Savi, Sed, Sophia, Spice, .SRCINFO.
  • You can now access your watchlist from outside of the user menu in the new Vector skin. The watchlist link appears next to the notification icons if you are at the top of the page. [10]

Events

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your reverts

The article 2009 in Bellator MMA says in its first sentence: 2009 in Bellator MMA was the first installment of the Bellator Fighting Championships (Bellator FC)-produced series. Something that runs yearly as part of a wider-series is a sub-topic of the wider series. On Wikipedia, we use {{Infobox television}} for the series-level page and {{Infobox television season}} for the the yearly pages. Can you explain why in your opinion it should use {{Infobox television}} instead? Gonnym (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Gonnym Good day. Thank you for the message. Year in Bellator MMA is not a television series nor yearly. The page recorded the events held in that particular year. To me is should not be using television infobox. There is a discussion going on and when editors join the discussion and if different infoboxis need, we will change it. Cassiopeia talk 10:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Where is that discussion? I can't find it at Talk:Bellator MMA. Gonnym (talk) 10:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Could you please point me to it? Gonnym (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Gonnym it is in one of the Bellator pages, I need to find it and will ping you. Cassiopeia talk 02:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Gonnym, Here is the changes from to Infobox television to Year in Combat Sports - see 2022 in Bellator MMA talk page. Cassiopeia talk 02:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

User_talk:Cassiopeia/Archive_74#Distructive_Edit_Reverts

Hey, that IP, just another a-hole vandal. I just blocked one of the accounts they made. Take care, Drmies (talk) 23:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Drmies Hi, Thank you very much. Hope all is well with you. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 02:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

BMW Article

I got my info off the Wikipedia articles for 'Otto Flugmaschinenfabrik, Messerschmit and Rapp Motorenwerke GmbH. Would you mind undoing the reverting and attributing them for me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLGDatBoi1738 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

MLGDatBoi1738 Good day. This was your edit. You need to provide independent, reliable (IRS) source to support the content you added or changed for verification in regardless where you got the information from. IRS are those source from the major newspapers and books. To add a citation (source) from web, pls use the horizontal format of Template:Cite web. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Cassiopeia talk 02:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
oooh so that's how signing works. Okay I'll get a source for that claim ASAP. MLGDatBoi1738 (talk) 02:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Tiquipaya

Hello, in Cochabamba department predominant language is Quechua and this is language one of 37 official languages of the state. I think that native names must to use as first. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Юрій Пазій (talk • contribs) 02:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Юрій Пазій Good day. The point is that you can add the local name but you need to provide the source (independent, reliable source such as from the newspaper or books) for verification. The sources can be in any languages and if you use the source from the web, you can add the citation (source) by using the horizontal format of WP:Cite web. Pls stop adding info that is not support by source for you will be blocked from editing. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. Cassiopeia talk 02:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

New message from Q28

Hello, Cassiopeia. You have new messages at User:Cassiopeia/CVUA/Q28.
Message added 21:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Q28 has 5K edits ꧁(ღˇ◡ˇღ)꧂ 21:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

UFC on ESPN+ 63

Hello - I'm not sure if you intended for the above page to be blank... Gjs238 (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Gjs238 Hi good day. Thank you for checking. It meant to be a redirect and I have just redirected the page. Once again, thank you. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your revert on Stella Nyanzi

Hey, just to let you know, I undid your revert and added the lacking sources, seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stella_Nyanzi&type=revision&diff=1068542428&oldid=1068541842 Have a nice one and thanks for helping out Wikipedia :)

Jcelto (talk) 01:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Jcelto Good day. I saw you have added the sources. Thank you. Stay safe and happy editing. Cassiopeia talk 01:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Eagle Fighting Championship women

Hi. There is a link with Khabib saying no women in EFC for now. https://www.sportskeeda.com/mma/news-ufc-news-khabib-nurmagomedov-reveals-eagle-fc-will-women-s-divisions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erlan 77 (talk • contribs) 08:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Erlan 77 Good day and thank you for the message. The source is not reliable but there are some other independent and reliable source sstate the same thing - see bollodyelbow, mma weekly and lowkick. The info you added was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eagle_Fighting_Championship&diff=next&oldid=1068573409&diffmode=source "Since GFC became EFC, all female competitions were cancelled." but the sources indicate "The lack of female talent being the reason there are no women's stars in Eagle FC yet." You can add "The lack of female talent being the reason there are no women's stars in Eagle FC yet" by using the sources I provided in the article. Pls use the horizontal format of Template:Cite web when add the inline citation at the end of the sentence. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. Happy editing. Cassiopeia talk 08:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Saladillo Partido

I just changed the name of the county to Saladillo (the name used in other languages, and the article name itself and in every other place) from Saladildo, which was an old bandalism from 2015.

181.170.39.127 (talk) 01:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC) Anon

181.170.39.127, Hi thank you for the message above. Tehe article name is Saladillo Partido so, pls do not change the name of the article in the lead (intro section). If the name has already changed in reality, you need to provide multiple sources (independent and reliable) to support your claim and provide the sources (newspapers) in the article talk page (sources can be in any languages) and request for the article name change then the lead section of the article can also be change. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 01:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

The correction I first made was changing it from Saladildo to Saladildo, this correction was reversed back to Saladildo.

But the city was never named Saladildo, the only instance of it being called Saladildo is this very Wikipedia article and it started in 2015 as seen here [link].

  1. Saladillo Partido, as listed in Buenos Aires Province's Supreme Court website, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  2. Saladillo, county/city website, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  3. Tripadvisor], Tourism web article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  4. [La Nación], News article from 2021, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  5. [a24], another one, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  6. es:Saladillo_(Buenos_Aires) Spanish Wikipedia article (City), appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  7. Saladillo_Partido This very Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  8. es:Partido_de_Saladillo Spanish Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  9. de:Partido_Saladillo German Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  10. fr:Saladillo_(partido) French Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  11. it:Partido_di_Saladillo Italian Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  12. pt:Saladillo_(município) Portuguese Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  13. ru:Саладильо_(муниципалитет) Russian Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  14. tr:Partido_de_Saladillo Turkish Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  15. nl:Saladillo_(partido) Dutch Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
  16. sv:Partido_de_Saladillo Swedish Wikipedia article, appears as Saladillo, not Saladildo.
181.170.39.127 (talk) 03:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC) Anon
181.170.39.127, ok. Cassiopeia talk 23:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

The Donna Reed Show

I'm a classic TV buff and have been watching episodes of The Donna Reed Show for an article I intend to write. I have been making notes and have been adding them to the Wikipedia page about the show. I can't list a source because I'm the source of the info. Why did you delete them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeffington1944 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Skeffington1944 Good day. Info added need to be verified by independent, reliable source and the editor who added or changed the content need to provide the source - see WP:PROVEIT and WP:BURDEN. You and I nor any editors in the Wikipedia and sources from any social media and etc. can NOT be the sources for we are not considered a reliable sources for we are just anonymous editors. Sources that are independent and reliable are those from the newpapers or books. Sources can be in any languages and you can add the source (inline citation) by using the horizontal format of Template:Cite web. See more guidelines on your talk page where I sent you a welcome message. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. Cassiopeia talk 23:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Rafael HP

Hi. In the spirit of the project, please could you advise on RafaelHP. I'm sick of repairing records I've worked on. If he's so insistent on Sherdog being wrong, there should at the very least be an inline citation. At the moment, he's simply changing the sourced info as regards his own opinion. I realise you have no authority but only ask for your input as I know you're good at this sort of thing.NEDOCHAN (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

NEDOCHAN, Good day. I understand your frustration. Can you provide the hist diffs pls? Cassiopeia talk 23:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassiopeia/Archive_74&oldid=1069593709"