Jump to content

User talk:Bloom6132/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 10

Regarding image sizes, I think you're wrong in this case. Users are able to set their own preferred thumbnail sizes on the "Preferences" page, and it is not recommended for articles to force images to a particular size unless absolutely necessary. If you think that the "upright" setting makes images too small, that is your problem, I'm afraid. Furthermore, regarding "work"/"publisher" agreement, the Premier League may not maintain any other websites, but it does produce print publications that could easily fall under the "work" parameter. – PeeJay 14:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

But it is your problem. You think the images are too small? That's a subjective opinion that is not supported by Wikipedia policy or any precedent set at a recognised forum of discussion. Keeping the default thumbnail size, however, is. Please see Wikipedia:Thumbnail, which says under section 2.4 (Thumbnail sizes), "In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good reason to do so: some users have small screens or need to configure their systems to display large text". Apart from a former FLC, I can see no good reason to fiddle with the size of these images. – PeeJay 15:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Furthermore, I can see nothing in the FLC discussion you mentioned that alludes to the size of any images. It looks like the issue was just ignored, not that 200px was suggested as an optimum image size. – PeeJay 15:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
That is exactly what I'm suggesting, although I'm not implying that they were negligent in any way, as you seem to believe. They may simply not have noticed the image sizes or not thought it was an issue. However, I am now bringing it to your attention that Wikipedia policy explicitly states that image sizes should not be forced unless absolutely necessary. Imagine viewing either the Premier League Golden Boot or 30–30 club articles on a smaller screen than you are currently using; 200px might be too large for that screen and cause conflicts with the table itself, thus creating the exact opposite problem to that of too much whitespace which you were trying to solve. I'm not trying to make your life a misery, just pointing out Wikipedia policy that you seem not to have been aware of. Can I assume you've had a read of Wikipedia:Thumbnail now? – PeeJay 15:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
If they're too big for you, perhaps you should change your default thumbnail size? – PeeJay 15:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
By the way, I never said the Premier League doesn't maintain other websites, I said they may not. The fact of the matter is that it is irrelevant, since the "work" parameter merely italicises whatever is put into it and may apply not just to websites but also to magazine series. For example, the UEFA Champions League magazine, entitled "Champions", is a UEFA publication separate from their website. Hence, it is possible for the "work" parameter to be used for print publications, not just web ones. – PeeJay 16:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for We Three Kings

The DYK project (nominate) 08:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Awards for Mangrove Robin

The Stub Barnstar
I thereby award you with The Stub Barnstar for expanding Mangrove Robin to a C-class article. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The Bio-star
I thereby award you with the Bio-star for expanding Mangrove Robin to a C-class article. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Stone Nullah Lane

Orlady (talk) 09:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mangrove Robin

Hello! Your submission of Mangrove Robin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! EagerToddler39 (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

The Stub Barnstar
I thereby award you with The Stub Barnstar for expanding Black-breasted Thrush to a C-class article. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
The Bio-star
I thereby award you with the Bio-star for expanding Black-breasted Thrush to a C-class article. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Black-breasted Thrush

Hello! Your submission of Black-breasted Thrush at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Acather96 (click here to contact me) 19:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pat Collins

The article Pat Collins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pat Collins for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Mangrove Robin

Thanks from the wiki and the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Re:DYK points for Mangrove Robin

Thanks for the note, I've fixed this and asked the bot operator to look into why it was missed. J Milburn (talk) 10:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
I am happy to acknowledge your 50 (and counting!) DYK page creations, many on the subject of baseball, cathedrals, and other global topics. Keep up the great work! Yoninah (talk) 01:42, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Black-breasted Thrush

Materialscientist (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Tip O'Neill Award

Why are ties supposed to be denoted separately? --charge2charge (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

All baseball award templates list ties separately – it's the long-established standard. It's got to do with the tables in baseball lists, which list each winner out separately on a different row rather than merging cells for years, because it screws up the sortability function. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bloom, my watchlist has been lit up recently by your expansion of Marvin Miller MOY award, as I created the article from a redirect. If you need any help, I would be more than happy to assist, but I do not know what your vision for the article entails. Conversely, if you don't need help, I will stay out of your way. Either way, thanks for your work on that article Go Phightins!

Hey Phightins! I'm basically trying to take this list to featured status, with a similar style to other community service-based baseball award FLs like Lou Gehrig Memorial Award, Branch Rickey Award, etc. I'm close to being done, but feel free to help anytime if you feel there's anything missing! Specifically, if you happen to know where I can get a free PD pic of Marvin Miller, that would be great, as all the award FLs have the namesake pictured (and the fair-use pic on his main article was deemed unusable on the award page). Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Well, other than this one, I could not find another, however even that one is claiming fair use, as he is now deceased, which may provide some leverage ... if solely being dead qualifies anything as fair use, there are a number of options. Per WP:NFCI criterion 10, "Pictures of deceased persons, in articles about that person, provided that ever obtaining a free close substitute is not reasonably likely" are eligible for fair use. Go Phightins! 23:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Premier League Golden Glove

Orlady (talk) 08:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Marpesia zerynthia

The DYK project (nominate) 15:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Awards for Tonna galea

The Stub Barnstar
I thereby award you with The Stub Barnstar for expanding Tonna galea to a C-class article. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
The Bio-star
I thereby award you with the Bio-star for expanding Tonna galea to a C-class article. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey Bloom, I am thrilled to see that you expanded Tonna galea and submitted it as a DYK! Thank you so much on behalf of WikiProject Gastropods. The giant tun is a large and interesting creature, and well deserves the increased public interest you will bring to it! Invertzoo (talk) 23:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject Gastropods
I've noticed your edits on pages relating to Gastropods; perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Gastropods?
If you would like more information, please visit the project page or the project talk page.


DYK for Tonna galea

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bolshoy Ice Dome

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Waterfall Bay, Hong Kong

The DYK project (nominate) 21:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

  1. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
  2. Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
  3. United States WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Frédéric Chopin

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

IRC

Hi, several people from the baseball wikiproject are getting together after Wizardman's sudden retirement to figure out a better way to organize the Wikiproject. One of the ideas we came up with is having our own IRC channel to help each other, as well as new users with collaboration and content. If you need help connecting to IRC join #wikipedia-coffeehouse connect. The IRC channel for Wikiproject Baseball is #wiki-baseball connect. Thanks Secret account 22:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Cole Hamels

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

2 grand slams in one game by same player

Mr Bloom6132,

I AM very new to Baseball wiki, so I suppose I'm not up to speed on how communication works. I suppose I might have realized that the site was one that was carefully considered people who spend a lot of time on baseball wiki, and if Park wasn’t cited, there was a reason for that. But I didn’t realize this and so I was surprised to get a strong reaction when I added the fact that he gave up both homers.

I'll keep a lower profile until I'm more familiar with how things work. I'm happy to take the edge of the "history," if you'd like. But I don't know how to do that – I’m open to suggestions.


I should say this – I added the citation of Park because I thought it was remarkable. I thought there was a reference to the box score, or an article about Tatis, that told about Park and was sufficient.

The category is "two grand slams in one game," and there is a subcategory of two grand slams in an inning. I note that records for most RBIs in a game were included in the article, and that seemed like a bit of a departure from the topic. If citing something about the opposing pitcher is too far a reach, given how baseball categories have worked under Wiki, that is good enough for me.

Also, I understand your suggestion of a category that says “most grand slams in one game given up by one pitcher.” That would capture Parks’ accomplishment.

I don’t know the best way to capture events that connect the accomplishment of a specific batter with those of a specific pitcher.

OK, thanks for the challenge – I learned a lot.

datavid Datavid (talk) 03:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bolshoy Ice Dome

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bolshoy Ice Dome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bolshoy Ice Dome

The article Bolshoy Ice Dome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bolshoy Ice Dome for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Given your involvement at Template:Did you know nominations/Orel Hershiser's scoreless inning streak, you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Orel Hershiser's scoreless innings streak/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Inside Corner : March 30, 2014

What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:

DYK for Coat of arms of Senegal

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 20:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

The Inside Corner : March 30, 2014

What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:

DYK for Peanuts (film)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup error

Hi there- this is just a quick note to apologise for a small but important mistake in the last WikiCup newsletter; it is not 64 users who will progress to the next round, but 32. J Milburn (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Flag of NATO

The DYK project (nominate) 16:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Seal of Mali

Your help is appreciated by the DYK project and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 08:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

re: Pat Seerey

Sucks to hear about your laptop. No worries about the article though, might take me a couple weeks yet to wrap everything up, plus maybe in your sources you have something that I might have missed. Wizardman 02:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Toronto Argonauts

slakrtalk / 17:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

If you have time to spare then loading and approving DYK hooks would be useful. Victuallers (talk) 18:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for outstanding work over an extended period of time, particularly related to baseball. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Northern Antarctica submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I'd like to nominate Bloom6132 for recognition as Editor of the Week due to the many contributions that he has made over of the course of approximately four years. I tend to associate this editor with baseball-related work, but he has also made significant contributions in other areas, including articles about cathedrals and national flags. A very accomplished content creator, Bloom6132's work is represented by his multiple FLs, GAs, DYKs and ITNs. Wikipedia needs strong content creators and this user is definitely one such person. [

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! I too can personally attest to Bloom's fine baseball contributions. Happy Easter! Go Phightins! 15:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Bloom6132
Justice displaying the Golden Rule
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning April 20, 2014
Multiple FLs, GAs, DYKs and ITNs. Always adheres to the Golden Rule when interacting with fellow users. The majority of his four years of content contributions are focused towards baseball related work, cathedrals and churches, tennis and other global topics – as reflected in his DYKs.
Recognized for
Creation and expansion of WP articles
Notable work(s)
Core Four
Nomination page

Wow, what a nice surprise this is! Thank you – Northern Antarctica – for the nomination, and everyone for the support you've given me, not just here but throughout all the years I've been here on WP. I greatly cherish and appreciate it! —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Inside Corner : April 27, 2014

What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for your brilliant work on 2014 Ürümqi attack; I was hesitant to write on a topic that I had no experience with, but you created an excellent article, thank you! Best, Matty.007 16:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I toyed with nominating this, but past experience says DYK is slower than ITN. Thanks, Matty.007 15:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I decided to nom the article just in case it didn't garner enough support at ITN (it only has 2 support votes right now). I would've inevitably forgotten to nominate this after 5 days elapse. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's United States ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Washington, D.C. Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Canada Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Minas Gerais Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Nepal Czar (submissions) and Indiana Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 17:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

FLC review request

Hello. Hope you're well. Corvoe and I nominated American Hustle's accolades page a few weeks ago (Link) for FL. It would be really helpful if you could review it.Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by American Hustle/archive1. Many thanks for your assistance. Cowlibob (talk) 22:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Coat of arms of Fiji

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring and conduct

Stop icon

Don't get frustrated. Just drop it and walk away. I'm not sure how to put this kindly. It doesn't matter who was right or who was wrong. You and the concerned editor have both violated the three-revert rule, and then engaged in a heated argument that involved personal attacks and grossly inappropriate conduct. Incivility will not be tolerated. We are here to work collaboratively to build an encyclopedia. If you are unable to do that, preventive measures will be put in place in accordance with the blocking policy. — MusikAnimal talk 03:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Please note I am about to archive the discussion on my talk page (partly because I am going on holiday and want it 'fresh' for when I return, but mainly because it was getting nowhere} - I suggest you discuss the matter at the article talk page, WT:FOOTY or WP:DRN. GiantSnowman 18:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:BASEBALL editor spotlight

Hi Bloom, I am interested in featuring you as the editor spotlighted in the inaugural editor spotlight of this month's Inside Corner, the project newsletter. If you would be willing to be featured, please answer the following questions:

  • What is your favorite part of contributing to Wikipedia, and specifically WikiProject Baseball?
  • What is the best article or list on which you have worked?
  • After four years and 12,000 edits, what makes you keep coming back?
  • How could editors at WP:BASEBALL help or support you in your article/list work?

Thank you in advance! Go Phightins! 23:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of Major League Baseball hitters who have batted in 10 runs in one game

Hello! Your submission of List of Major League Baseball hitters who have batted in 10 runs in one game at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Giants2008 (Talk) 18:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Flag of Uzbekistan

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for List of Major League Baseball hitters who have batted in 10 runs in one game

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:02, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

The Inside Corner : May 31, 2014

What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:

Please take a look at Almstriden an article that I created yesterday. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Flag of the Gambia

Materialscientist (talk) 21:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for El Gran Carlemany

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Nicolae Minovici DYK

Hi Bloom6132. FYI, I just finished the QpQ. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Flag of São Tomé and Príncipe

Hello! Your submission of Flag of São Tomé and Príncipe at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 22:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Khanjar

Materialscientist (talk) 01:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for National emblem of Oman

Materialscientist (talk) 01:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Flag of São Tomé and Príncipe

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Flag of Sierra Leone

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

The Inside Corner : June 27, 2014

What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:

DYK for Carlos Ruiz (baseball)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 June newsletter

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Scotland Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to Florida 12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Bartošovice v Orlických horách Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Premier League Player of the Season

Gatoclass (talk) 18:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

GAR

Hi Bloom, I was browsing Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and saw that you had Khanjar nominated. Would you be willing to exchange GA reviews: I review Khanjar (though not a specialist area of mine), and you review one of my noms (2006 CECAFA Cup, Ernest Radcliffe Bond, or Henry Alexander Stuart-Menteth). Is that acceptable to you? Thanks, Matty.007 14:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Holy Rosary Cathedral

Hey Bloom, I see you're working on this. I don't have much time to help content-wise, but I work at the Vancouver Public Library once a week, right next to Special Collections. If you need help with sources, let me know. The Interior (Talk) 19:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

The Interior – Thanks for your offer to help with getting refs! I would be interested if it's not too out of the way for you. Will I need to set up an WP email first? —Bloom6132 (talk) 20:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
If you need any scans of docs, I'll have to have some email contact for you. Alternately, if it's a short bit of text I can post it here, or to the article talk. It's definitely not too much trouble; I work literally 10 feet away from the Northwest history collection here, every Saturday. The Interior (Talk) 20:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The Interior – OK, I've just activated an email address for WP. For sources – preferably ones that goes into detail about the cathedral, or mentions its history or architecture. Also, if there's any way I could return the favour and get docs off NewsBank and JSTOR, or academic journals from Google Scholar that are subscription/registration-required (if you don't already have access to them), I'd be more than happy to! Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Flag of Liechtenstein

Gatoclass (talk) 03:47, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

2014 Wimbledon Championships - Men's Singles

In your recent edit of 2014 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Singles you said made changes such as removing "epic final" yet described the Federer-Raonic semi-final as one of "domination." But a 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 score line doesn't look like "domination" to me. OK, it's a straight sets win, but if that's domination, what would you call a 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 scoreline or 6-0, 6-0, 6-0, or 7-6, 7-6, 7-6 for that matter? A 6-3, 6-0 scoreline is one of domination, but not 6-4, 6-4, 6-4. Also, your changes take away from the significant - I think - fact that Dimitrov and Raonic made their first career semi-finals. What do you think? --Trb333 (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khanjar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Khanjar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matty.007 -- Matty.007 (talk) 09:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Flag of the Bahamas

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:46, 10 July 2014 (UTC)