User talk:AfnanzafarBD

August 2023

Hello, I'm --WikiUser1234945--. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Mêdog County because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I am still learning so my apologies. Will be more careful. AfnanzafarBD (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Will u be able to guide me how properly i can write to publish this article as it is getting bit confusing.

I have refereed another article which i took as a reference and expanded on details on the market information so I am not sure why it was against the guidelines while theirs are ok. Would you mind to help

Carsome This is the reference i saw AfnanzafarBD (talk) 08:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AfnanzafarBD/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:AfnanzafarBD/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 15:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Flux Malaysia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Flux Malaysia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request help to create an article

Hi,

Will anybody be able to assist in review an article that i have posted earlier but it was deleted mentioning that it is subtle of advertising, but I have taken an example of this page which seems more advertising but been approved. So, I am confused and will be helpful to get someone to have a look at my article and see what can i improve to ensure it follows the guideline of wiki.

This is the reference of the article i have mentioned that i saw on wii: Carsome - Wikipedia AfnanzafarBD (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor, please very carefully read WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AfnanzafarBD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor: you still have lots of inappropriate language. Please write completely dispassionately and in a completely neutral tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 08:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sentences like "utilizing technology, with a primary focus on hassle-free mobility for its customers" and "framework by aligning to the evolving global shifts in car ownership patterns towards an all-inclusive subscription model" are advertorial. You also do not need to talk about the history of car ownership and how this provides a "solution" to the problem. This draft will continue to be rejected until the article reads like an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Three non-independent sources and one that doesn't appear to mention the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 01:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Stuartyeates

May i check what do you mean by: Three non-independent sources - The reference is taken from third party sources so are they not counted as non-independent? Any example you may provide that showcases non-independent - it will help a lot. AfnanzafarBD (talk) 05:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you start at Wikipedia:Independent sources. Bear in mind that sources don't have to be in English. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Flux Malaysia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flux Malaysia. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 21:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AfnanzafarBD (talk) 07:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revised on the copy and reference

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To put this to rest, I did a search online for sourcing to see if anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT even exists. I found a few such as this which I though would meet it, but upon closer examination it is not independent. The rest are routine announcements, interviews, or otherwise fall short of ORGCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revised the article for your kind review AfnanzafarBD (talk) 10:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Updated as per your comments - kindly have a look

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by F.Alexsandr was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous reviewers comments were not adressed. Fails in notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

F.Alexsandr (talk) 22:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flux Malaysia

Firstly and most importantly just because other articles exist doesn't mean that a similar article should exist. I concur with your comments regarding Carsome and have highlighted them on the article. If it is hard to find any independent sources which provide significant coverage of Flux Malaysia that might be a sign that the company is not really notable (at this stage).

Secondly there is a lot more scrutiny being applied for WP:AFC drafts, so the bar has definitely been lifted.

I wish you all the best and encourage you to persevere with your efforts - if you feel strongly that the company is notable (and addresses the requirements of WP:NCOMPANY). Dan arndt (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S5A-0043 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous concerns still not resolved yet, the only change I see before submission is the addition of one dot. No other changes (especially to sourcing) have been made and I still don't see evidence that this is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S5A-0043^Talk 11:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flux Malaysia (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deepfriedokra was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flux Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Flux Malaysia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Flux Malaysia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Flux Malaysia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Flux Malaysia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 13:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AfnanzafarBD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why i will be blocked-I have been trying out this new article on my own and different people are giving different directions which was very demotivating and not helpful as most comments were very general except few. As mentioned i am new here and i have asked help in the user page so stamping me as commercially driven is not good while i can see some companies like carsome have same article but then it is still up and while i took similar direction to write, i am getting blocked. AfnanzafarBD (talk) 05:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You gravely misunderstand what we do here. Companies do not "have articles" here that they own and control; Wikipedia has articles about companies that meet our criteria, which we term "notability"- see the definition of a notable company. Not every company merits an article, even within the same field. Articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnnected with the company. As those editors are volunteers, it is possible for inappropriate content to get by us, this cannot justify the addition of more inappropriate content- see other stuff exists. It's possible that these other articles you have seen are also inappropriate and simply not addressed yet by a volunteer. Saying that another article was written by company employees who did not disclose is a serious accusation requiring serious evidence- be prepared to provide your evidence or withdraw the accusation.

You are blocked because it seems that you work for Flux Malaysia and have failed to disclose this according to the Terms of Use- see WP:PAID. You should also read conflict of interest. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AfnanzafarBD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can understand your point and i am fully aware of wikipedia but it is not fair to assume that i work for Flux. I have been approached by people to get this article approve by paying - moderators from wikipedia but if i worked for FLUX, i would have paid them to get it approved. Instead i am trying to learn and improve my skills on an article that i have started else i will waste time without knowing the ins and outs isn't it? I am writing on them as i used to work in automotive industry so i have the knowledge and i saw carsome page where the idea came to create one for FLUX. The only issue was i could find similar independent article like carsome and probably coz Flux is new in the market. So i am writing this article independent and i do not see why i am stamped as Flux employee? AfnanzafarBD (talk) 05:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request is almost incoherent. Off-wiki evidence shows you have a closer relationship to Flux than you are letting on here. You also don't demonstrate any understanding of why your edits were inappropriate even outside of WP:COI (and I have confirmed you do have a relationship here). Yamla (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AfnanzafarBD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

And again i am mentioning how and why do you confirm that i have close relation with FLUX? Is this a norm that you guys simply stamp an individual person or because i declined the paid offer from a moderator to get my article approved? As i clearly stated that if i had relation there i would fairly accept the moderator's offer to get this article approved which is very easy to understand. Or shall i claim that you are related to those moderators who are trying to earn by wrongfully asking money? And yes i did not understand as different moderator has been commenting very different without any clear guidance. I have read and checked wiki's guide and i do not see any issue as notability as i have provided various options at different times but yet i was getting rejected which does not sound right too. AfnanzafarBD (talk) 01:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think someone tried to scam you- legitimate editors or administrators will not demand payment. Unscrupulous people will impersonate editors to do so. See WP:SCAM. 331dot (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are dancing around the question- if you work for Flux Malaysia, the time to tell us is now, straight up, yes or no. We're limited in what we can say per policy. 331dot (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:331dot I do not think i am dancing around the question. I have confirmed this multiple times and also above if you can refer that I am not associated with FLUX. I found their service interesting and innovative thus took as my 1st trial of my 1st article. So i hoped for help instead wrong judgement.

And I am sure someone was trying to scam by asking payment, but it will not be easy to find out that I am writing my article and struggling simply without being a part in Wikipedia. How would they know that I am struggling right? Anyway, my point is that I have taken example of others and I believe the article was modified pretty independently. Are you guys able to help on completing so i can move on to my next article by understanding the mistakes i made. Thanks.

Hi @Jimfbleak

I demand you provide a proof that I am getting paid for this article. Do not simply block people based on your hypothesis or at least consult before taking an action. I am sure you are saint enough to know this. Flux will not be without brain to pay someone like me who is a starter and still learning how to get through Wikipedia articles.

As has been said, WP:OUTING prevents us from saying any more than we have. I too have confirmed you have a strong connection to FLUX as well. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]