User talk:200.33.20.218

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ahmed Mohamed clock incident. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (200.33.20.218) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! VQuakr (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

200.33, I removed your last post per WP:NPA. If you have questions/comments about collaboration in general the teahouse may be a good place to start, but WP:NPA and WP:BLP apply there as well. VQuakr (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the definition of "personal attacks"? I criticize what people DO, not who they are. I don't know them, so I am not attacking their PERSON. Stop defending Politically-Correct thugs. 200.33.20.218 (talk) 17:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you click the blue link WP:NPA, you can read the definition of personal attacks as used on Wikipedia. VQuakr (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly urge you to observe civility and avoid personal attacks, or you may be blocked from editing without further warning. If you have concrete proposals for the article that are not a wall-of-inflammatory-text, then you may submit these. But make sure that you keep in mind neutrality here is about giving due weight to reliable sources, which you are expected to cite. And that we take protection of living people very seriously. El_C 20:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

200.33.20.218 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should not be obstructed from USING the WP:ANI complaint process, or any other formal or informal system of dispute resolution. To do otherwise is obviously INSANE. 200.33.20.218 (talk) 21:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Decline. Take some time to read the policies and guidelines mentioned above, including the one on original research. El_C 21:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

200.33.20.218 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just as I thought, your enforcement of the rules is clearly insane. You have absolutely no idea whether I have, or previously did, "read the policies and guidelines mentioned above", nor have you actually APPLIED them to the facts of this case. You seem to be assuming that nobody else is in the wrong, and that I MUST be in the wrong. Worse, you are NOT an uninvolved, disinterested, and objective party to this matter. You were, and are, VERY much involved, interested, and are obviously a person who wishes to CONTROL the entire appeal process. Otherwise, you wouldn't have posted here. You wanted to post, in order to prevent me from getting a fair, prompt hearing on this matter. Do you realize that for an INVOLVED, INTERESTED, AND BIASED person such as yourself to interfere with my appeal to this block is blatantly improper. Obstructing a person from using the formal and informal dispute-resolution system of WP is clearly malicious and intended to obstruct people from objecting to the misdeeds of others. Try again. Don't try to merely delay the resolution by asking me to perform a vague and indefinite task:"read the policies and guidelines mentioned above" " You could repeat that statement a hundred times, and it would merely be an intentional delay in the solution to the real problem, which is abusive editors who think they WP:OWN articles. 200.33.20.218 (talk) 22:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. Max Semenik (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I am the uninvolved admin who protected the page. El_C 08:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

200.33.20.218 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see, you INVENT excuses to not respond to appeals, complaints, or anything else. The fact that my previous appeal was "answered" by an INTERESTED, BIASED, INVOLVED party, and thus was quite improper, and thus I never got PROPER adjudication of my complain and appeal, does not seem to interest you. And where is your claimed rule, "Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered"? Sure, you don't LIKE to be contradicted, even criticized, but that does not automatically violate the rules. But you are using "offense" to excuse not actually following YOUR rules. And what, PRECISELY, is a "personal attack"? If I express any disagreement whatsoever with a person who has victimized me, in the way I have been, does that amount to a "personal attack"? I am laughing at the system here! You guys have set up a truly amazingly biased, unfair, and ineffective way to "appeal" this stuff, and to obstruct the continued use of formal and informal appeal processes. You should be utterly ashamed. 200.33.20.218 (talk) 23:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 00:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.