User:Mathiastck/1

I am here archiving pages people have out of process threatened with deletion.

Wasn't there a page here? Mathiastck 15:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah it got deleted

I don't understand why articles are put through a deletion process without any attempt to discuss whether to delete the article in it's talk page. I'm now looking for an appropriate place to discuss the deletion of this specific talk page, and it's article. Here are the places I've found so far:

Template:Future_article_talk_page Template_talk:Future_article_talk_page Template_talk:Futureart Template_talk:Db-talk Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G8:_Talk_pages Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Extend_G8_to_include_.22needed.22_articles User_talk:Mathiastck#Template_moved User_talk:RyanGerbil10#Deletion_of_Template:Future_article_talk_page User_talk:BigNate37/TM/Future_article_talk_page User_talk:Nae'blis#Template:Future_article_talk_page

As well as some meta pages on related issues. Mathiastck 15:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

See the Deletion discussion. I'll tag this page for re-deletion in a few days, under WP:CSD#Criteria G4/G8. (sorry, I was kinda interested in using this template too, but the process has spoken, and has redirected us to using Wikipedia:Requested articles, as we should have been doing (Notes on subjects can be added there, see this example under Evolution)). --Quiddity 19:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Um I think you are misinterpreting G8. I would suggest you read it again, and see the discussion of G8 on G8's talk page. I'm currently trying to use G8 to assist in the creation of this article :) Mathiastck 14:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)