Template talk:Anticonvulsants

Is there any way to make this box less bulky? JFW | T@lk 20:52, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

I agree with this, it should be changed, as it is not very pretty (to say at the least) right now! --WS 05:34, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Just get rid of it. This seems to be what's happening to these gargantuan templates elsewhere. If there's that much to organise, it should be a category, not a template.

Does anyone mind if I go ahead and do this? -- N3X15 ^{( Scream · Contribs)} 17:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

You mean: delete the template, all the sub-templates, and everywhere it is used? I wouldn't mourn their loss and agree that the category system is more useful for such a large list. However, I think you might want to first post a message on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine. This will affect about 60 articles! --Colin°^Talk 22:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Following recent discussions (Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-07-09_Pharmacology_Templates and notice of this discussion placed in CLINMED & Drug projects), ATC code need only be in title bar (for anyone who wants to see treatment classification scheme), and comma separate items vs current brackets is more compact. Items within a group then sorted alphabetically. David Ruben ^Talk 23:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Vigabatrin

...is an analog of GABA, and will be relocated to that part of the anticonvulsants template.