Talk:Royal Library of Turin
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal Library of Turin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081017083322/http://www.artsbma.org:80/exhibitions/leonardo-davinci/about-the-leonardo-exhibition/biblioteca-reale to http://www.artsbma.org/exhibitions/leonardo-davinci/about-the-leonardo-exhibition/biblioteca-reale
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 7 December 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Royal Library of Turin be renamed and moved to Biblioteca Reale. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Royal Library of Turin → Biblioteca Reale – Ngrams show this to be the more common name in English-language sources, and the Google Books results on which the ngrams are based show this (the library in Turin) to be the primary topic for the name Biblioteca Reale. Ham II (talk) 09:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Slight oppose. When 'the' is added to the n-grams the results are much closer. 'Royal Library of Turin' is also better understood in English on English Wikipedia, especially since the page mentions it is part of the Royal Palace of Turin (using the English name, not the Italian, for this World Heritage Site). Randy Kryn (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- The results are closer in the second set of ngrams, but they still have "the Biblioteca Reale" ahead of "the Royal Library of Turin" by what looks to me like a comfortable margin. "[T]he Biblioteca Reale" wouldn't catch many image captions for, say, the supposed self-portrait by Leonardo da Vinci, so I think "Biblioteca Reale" is a more representative search term. Though I do now see in the bibliography in this Google Books result a book from 1990 with the title From Leonardo to Rembrandt: Drawings from the Royal Library of Turin, albeit with the publisher given as
Biblioteca Reale
. - The name of the World Heritage Site seems to be "Residences of the Royal House of Savoy", and that link, which is the English-language listing on UNESCO's World Heritage List, refers to the Royal Palace of Turin as both the
Royal Palace
and thePalazzo Reale
. Ham II (talk) 09:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- The results are closer in the second set of ngrams, but they still have "the Biblioteca Reale" ahead of "the Royal Library of Turin" by what looks to me like a comfortable margin. "[T]he Biblioteca Reale" wouldn't catch many image captions for, say, the supposed self-portrait by Leonardo da Vinci, so I think "Biblioteca Reale" is a more representative search term. Though I do now see in the bibliography in this Google Books result a book from 1990 with the title From Leonardo to Rembrandt: Drawings from the Royal Library of Turin, albeit with the publisher given as
- Oppose. WP:UE. Theparties (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- That part of policy means "follow usage in English-language sources", not "only use English words". Ham II (talk) 07:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Precisely. It's sad how often UE is misunderstood as "translate everything into English". -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- That part of policy means "follow usage in English-language sources", not "only use English words". Ham II (talk) 07:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Native names are always preferable as long as they are commonly used in English-language sources, as this is. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)