Talk:List of radiologic signs
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education assignment: WikiMed UTSW
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 November 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MaybeMD (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by MaybeMD (talk) 04:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Workplan
[edit]General: Add description for minimum 1 radiologic sign each weekday (going in alphabetical order and randomly picking signs that sound interesting).
11/22-11/24: Update "anteater nose", "absent bowtie", and "aortic nipple"
11/25: Update "bear paw"
11/26: Update "bowler hat"
11/27: Update "cheerio"
11/28: BREAK
11/29: Update "dripping candle wax"
11/30-12/1: BREAK
12/2: Update "eye of the tiger"
12/3: Update "fishook ureter"
12/4: Update "gloved finger"
12/5: Update "Holly Leaf" and "hotcross bun"
12/6: Update "insular ribbon"
12/7-12/8: BREAK
12/9: Update "J shaped sella"
12/10: Update "kidney bean"
12/11: Update "licked candy stick"
12/12: Update "maiden waist deformity"
12/13: LAST DAY OF COURSE; Update "Napoleon hat" MaybeMD (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
-Decided to switch to a different sign whenever there is a lack of good sources for my original choice. Also, adding pictures is quite complicated due to copyright/permission barrier, so will not pursue for this course. MaybeMD (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
-Went down to 1 page per day, which is more realistic pace for my schedule.
Here's my peer-review of the edits so far.
This is a super cool topic you chose, it is really interesting to go through and learn about the different radiologic signs. I like the amount of detail you go into with each page; it is an appropriate length and the organization is great. I was able to follow along with your descriptions, but it may help to use some more lay language for readers who might not have a medical background. That being said, I don't think any changes need to be made to your prior pages. The references seem to all be from reliable sources. My only other feedback is your work plan has a lot more pages for you to cover, so you could possibly decrease the number of pages you work on given the timeframe of the class. Overall, looks great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.165.154.108 (talk) 01:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the great peer review. I definitely acknowledge the descriptions could be less jargon-y, but this is hard to do given how advanced these imaging topics can be. I also want to avoid having to define things that have associated wikipages that they can read through for more details (so I just linked medical terms to their pages). I also recognize that I was overly ambitious with my workplan, and made a more realistic schedule for the rest of the course. Thanks again. MaybeMD (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)