Talk:Kaki Bukit MRT station

Kaki Bukit MRT station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 13, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kaki Bukit MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 05:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Will review within a week. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 05:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting read—on hold; over to you. Please ping me when you are done. :] Thanks, ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 17:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the changes! I am now happy to pass this article for GA status. Congrats! ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 12:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

Earwig says good to go.

File(s)

All files are relevant, good quality and copyright-free: all are CC BY-SA and uploaded to Commons by Wikimedians.

Prose

In the lead, "Kaki Bukit, Singapore" should be wikilinked to Kaki Bukit, Singapore instead.
- Done.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"August 2010 when the DTL Stage 3 (DTL 3)" – the acronym is not needed here as DTL 3 is not used again in the lead and the acronym is mentioned later in the body anyways.
- Done.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"21-kilometre (13 mi) Downtown line" – wikilink Downtown line as first menion in the body.
- Done.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"widened the adjacent roads, Jalan Tenaga and Jalan Damai," – the previous sentence says that Jalan Tenaga and Jalan Damai were closed? Or is this referring to a segment of the road? I would make this clearer, in that case.
- Er, I said "A segment of Kaki Bukit Avenue 1 from Jalan Tenaga to Jalan Damai".--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reckon public art could be wikilinked for unfamiliar readers.
- Done.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"It is a video" – how about "The artwork consists of a video" to avoid any ambiguity with it here? The next sentence can be changed to "It intends to reflect".
- I prefer The artwork is a video installation. Reword.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would note Singapore's four official languages.
- Done.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"for this artwork project" could probably be removed.
- Done.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies if this is something obvious that I am missng, but what does "that wouldn't have all three change simultaneously" mean?
- Basically it's a video installation of three screens. So over time the message in each screen will change.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

Passes spotcheck on refs 4, 7, 8 and 16.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.