Talk:Jeopardy!/GA3

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 17:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm BrandonWu, and I'll be the reviewer for this article. I hope to work through the GA review in a time period for 7 days, and I'll get the review started very soon! Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 17:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there are two reviews other than this one. Here are the links: the first review, and the second review.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
See below for a prose review!

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Lead is good, and rest of the article does follow MOS
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
See below for a source review as well!

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Major aspects covered!

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Images provided are good.

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

After further comments on the nom's talk page, the article is deemed GA! :D Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 01:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]