Jump to content

Talk:Japanese destroyer Kiri (1944)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 09:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prelim

[edit]

Lede and infobox

[edit]
  • "miod-1944" sp
  • Move convoy link to first mention
  • "Kiri returned home" not clear where home is
  • Are we sure the ship was commissioned on the day of her acquisition by the Soviets?

Design and description

[edit]
  • IJN acronym isn't explained anywhere
  • "The single mount was partially protected against spray by a gun shield" this suggests the other mount didn't have a gun shield, but from the image it looks as if it did?

Construction and career

[edit]
  • Suggest linking Battle off Cape Engaño again
  • I would have expected the "admiral" in "Vice-admiral" to be capitalised
  • Did the ship do anything particular in the battle, or is her role recorded?
    • Only that she had a problem refueling the day before the battle. She's not mentioned as doing anything in any of my sources.
  • "slightly damaged the following day" by what?
    • Combined Fleet says that they don't know by what. All I can guess is that it was not by American action as it doesn't line up with any American attacks on that date. Could have been something like grounding on a sandbar.
  • Main text suggests that the rescuing of Yūzuki's crew happens on 12 December, but the ship sank on 23 December per her infobox?
    • Definitely 12 December. I'll fix that ship's article accordingly
  • "on 17 June" needs the year
  • Do we have any idea what the ship was doing in Soviet service? The paragraph currently reads like a calendar
  • Suggest linking hulked
  • "3 October 1957" no need for repeated year

References

[edit]
  • References look good. AGF on print sources.
  • What makes www.combinedfleet.com a reliable source?
    • The website is owned and run by Jon Parshall, a published historian on the IJN

@Sturmvogel 66: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your responses. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All done, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]