Talk:Japanese destroyer Kiri (1944)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 09:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Prelim
[edit]- Navy list is a duplicated link
- No edit wars
- Was File:Momi II.jpg actually published prior to 1957?
- No idea, but the Japanese copyright requires either published or taken before 1957.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Earwig reports copyvio unlikely
Lede and infobox
[edit]- "miod-1944" sp
- Move convoy link to first mention
- "Kiri returned home" not clear where home is
- Are we sure the ship was commissioned on the day of her acquisition by the Soviets?
- No, just the month.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Design and description
[edit]- IJN acronym isn't explained anywhere
- "The single mount was partially protected against spray by a gun shield" this suggests the other mount didn't have a gun shield, but from the image it looks as if it did?
- That's actually the compartment for the gun crew.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Construction and career
[edit]- Suggest linking Battle off Cape Engaño again
- I would have expected the "admiral" in "Vice-admiral" to be capitalised
- Did the ship do anything particular in the battle, or is her role recorded?
- Only that she had a problem refueling the day before the battle. She's not mentioned as doing anything in any of my sources.
- "slightly damaged the following day" by what?
- Combined Fleet says that they don't know by what. All I can guess is that it was not by American action as it doesn't line up with any American attacks on that date. Could have been something like grounding on a sandbar.
- Main text suggests that the rescuing of Yūzuki's crew happens on 12 December, but the ship sank on 23 December per her infobox?
- Definitely 12 December. I'll fix that ship's article accordingly
- "on 17 June" needs the year
- Do we have any idea what the ship was doing in Soviet service? The paragraph currently reads like a calendar
- Agreed, but there's nothing out there better detailing her activities during this time.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Suggest linking hulked
- "3 October 1957" no need for repeated year
References
[edit]- References look good. AGF on print sources.
- What makes www.combinedfleet.com a reliable source?
- The website is owned and run by Jon Parshall, a published historian on the IJN
@Sturmvogel 66: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your responses. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- All done, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Passing this article as satisfying the GA criteria. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)