Jump to content

Talk:Georgian anti-LGBT law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The title of the article

[edit]

I'm wondering why is this merely a "propaganda law" while the Hungarian law is labeled a Hungarian anti-LGBT law? It's obvious that this Georgian law is much harsher and explicitly homophobic than those laws passed in Hungary, Lithuania, Kyrgyzstan and Bulgaria. Why are u trying to make this Georgian law look less harsh when actually its text is explicitly anti-LGBT worded? It should be named Georgian anti-LGBT law because it actually IS anti-LGBT law. Cyanmax (talk) 17:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 December 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerium (talk) 13:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Georgian LGBT propaganda lawGeorgian anti-LGBT law – For consistency and unbiased approach. This law is not only about "propaganda". It targets same-sex adoption, trans rights, pride flags and more. It's obvious that this Georgian law is much harsher and explicitly homophobic than those laws passed in Hungary, Lithuania, Kyrgyzstan and Bulgaria. It even designates 17 May (IDAHOBIT) as a holiday for the "sanctity of the family and respect for parents". If that's still not enough, I don't know what to say. I'm wondering why is this merely a "propaganda law" while the Hungarian law is labeled a Hungarian anti-LGBT law? Where is the Wikipedia's consistency? Cyanmax (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think that this title pretty clearly violates NPOV by using language that supporters of the bill would frame it with, as a non-official name article title. It can only be realistically applied to a small portion of the law, making it too narrow. Mason7512 (talk) 02:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, for the reasons already mentioned. Dustssics (talk) 13:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.