Jump to content

Talk:Gapo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Too promotional

[edit]

I'm not an expert but it looks like the text here is quite promotional for an encyclopedia article. It definitely needs rewording and substantial editing. --Hooliverson (talk) 21:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 November 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. With the subsequent response after the relist, I see rough consensus against the move with the natural disambigutors as proposed by Toadspike, and consensus for the disambiguation page at the parenthetical location. Hatnotes can be worked out in the articles themselves. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GapoGapo (social networking service) – The word Gapo needs to be a disambiguation because of the article GAPO syndrome. And topics in Draft:GAPO. Theparties (talk) 20:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 15:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Computing, WikiProject Internet, WikiProject Companies, and WikiProject Vietnam have been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: The main questions in this discussion are currently whether Draft:GAPO should be at Gapo (disambiguation), at GAPO/Gapo, or possibly another solution, and consequently whether the current Gapo needs to be moved, with the perennial question of whether WP:SMALLDIFFS applies. ASUKITE 15:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.