This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
I'm not an expert but it looks like the text here is quite promotional for an encyclopedia article. It definitely needs rewording and substantial editing.
--Hooliverson (talk) 21:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. With the subsequent response after the relist, I see rough consensus against the move with the natural disambigutors as proposed by Toadspike, and consensus for the disambiguation page at the parenthetical location. Hatnotes can be worked out in the articles themselves. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alternative solution: The draft disambiguation page mentioned by Theparties and the IP above is fairly helpful for assessing this. There are only three articles called "gapo" or something close to it: Gapo (a social network), 'GAPÔ (a film), and GAPO syndrome. The titles are all different enough that they are naturally disambiguated. This problem can be solved by adding hatnotes to those three articles, and moving the draft DAB page to Gapo (disambiguation). Toadspike[Talk]13:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.