Talk:Eugénie Blanchard

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

France

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance

Longevity

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity

Women's History

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History

Enough of "Longevity records"

This thing with milestones has gone to far, both with this and other articles. Who the fu*k cares about "35th oldest". Seriously! Even worse, some update almost every day the text with information like "she is the 33rd oldest person ever". At least now it states she is among the 40 oldest ever, wich is how you should put it. Please only mention milestones like 25th, 20th, 10th, and so on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leoj83 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Place of birth, residence

Greetings, just to make it clear, Eugenie Blanchard has was born on Saint Barthelemy. Her birth certificate indicated that it was part of Guadeloupe. I presume it's been part of Guadeloupe from 1878 to 2007, which it seceded.Ryoung122 22:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other info

I believe that she (Eugénie Blanchard) has dementia. There was something on the Internet mentioning that. I could try to locate it. And then add that here.(?) --Nick Ornstein (talk) 02:04, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not speculate. If there's no source, it shouldn't be added.Ryoung122 17:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the photo

it's a little bit oldish 77.127.195.193 (talk) 21:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And it's also not even her, by the way. SiameseTurtle (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, the Wikipedia is so fake 77.127.195.193 (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She does need a photo, she's the oldest living person now, can anyone find one? Jdisnard talk)

Here is good photograph - http://s.amur.net/images/forum/2343/originals/1aa06980f9e2bb47323f02c80630a866.jpg But sadfully, probably copyrighted. 91.212.146.10 (talk) 11:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2 vs. May 3

Did'nt Eugiene Blanchard inheirt the title of the World's oldest person on May 3, since it it was already the 3rd in Saint Barts, when Kama Chinen died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.213.131.190 (talk) 23:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Death

If she's now dead, who succeeds her as the oldest living woman?? Georgia guy (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eunice Sanborn. Dralwi k|^{Have a Chat} 16:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1896 link

Unless/until an older claim is verified, Eugenie Blanchard remains:

1. The current oldest person born in the year 1896

2. The last verified person to have been alive from Feb 16 1896 to July 19 1896

Now, I don't know who these anonymous IP's are, but their edits are rude, inconsiderate, and just plain wrong.

The main point of Wikipedia is the WIKILINK. To claim that the world's oldest person is not relevant to being born in the year they were born in, is just stupidity.

We see plenty of journal articles make the connection:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11696236

She was born on 16 February 1896, when the opera La Boheme was in its first season and just after the first X-ray machine had been unveiled.

So, your editing is not only stupid, it is a violation of WP:RS because it can be cited in reliable sources.Ryoung122 22:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eugénie Blanchard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100211075205/http://www.la-croix.com/A-la-sante-des-deux-doyens-des-Francais/article/2413709/4076 to http://www.la-croix.com/A-la-sante-des-deux-doyens-des-Francais/article/2413709/4076

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]