Talk:Canada/Archive 28
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Canada. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 |
New interactive zoomable map
@Canterbury Tail Hi, the OpenStreetMap map is interactive and zoomable and very well shows map of Canada. Why you revert my edit? This map is different from all existing maps. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Canterbury Tail I really believe that if you want to remove one of two maps, you should remove the svg map and not the OpenStreetMap map. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 16:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- In the infobox it added nothing over the map we already had, in fact it was less clear and requires you to go to an external link to get the use out of it which isn't useful in an infobox. Canterbury Tail talk 16:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Canterbury Tail I really disagree with you! It is very clear and even more clear than the svg. All water border is shown in this new map. Also islands of Canada is shown better and more clearly. These details only can be shown by OpenStreetMap. I.e., border of Canada is better shown.
- Additionally the ability of zooming on each city and each island of Canada is provided. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 16:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Canterbury Tail This ability is specially well-used by mobile users. They rapidly zoom by two fingers. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- You don't need to keep pinging me. The zoom functionality isn't available in the infobox, the user has to click and go to another page. The utility isn't there for the actual infobox. Anyway lets see what others have to say. Canterbury Tail talk 16:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Fully agree with Canterbury Tail. The original should be kept. —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Joeyconnick We are in the year 2023. I think we should not use maps from 19th or 20th century that lacks any metadata and are text free. Maps without metadata is for 19th century, we are in the year 2023. So we should use maps with full interctive metadata. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 19:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am with Canterbury Tail on this as well. You cannot actually zoom in much using the new map without clicking on it and leaving the Wikipedia website, and without that feature it is no more useful than the current map. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Joeyconnick We are in the year 2023. I think we should not use maps from 19th or 20th century that lacks any metadata and are text free. Maps without metadata is for 19th century, we are in the year 2023. So we should use maps with full interctive metadata. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 19:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Fully agree with Canterbury Tail. The original should be kept. —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- You don't need to keep pinging me. The zoom functionality isn't available in the infobox, the user has to click and go to another page. The utility isn't there for the actual infobox. Anyway lets see what others have to say. Canterbury Tail talk 16:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Canterbury Tail This ability is specially well-used by mobile users. They rapidly zoom by two fingers. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- In the infobox it added nothing over the map we already had, in fact it was less clear and requires you to go to an external link to get the use out of it which isn't useful in an infobox. Canterbury Tail talk 16:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
@QuicoleJR Aside from zoom and clicking problem, one of main differences of svg and OpenStreetMap is border of Canada. Please compare
with
The border of the second map shows only dryness lands, but Canada posses many seas. So the border of Canada in the second map is more accurate and useful.
- The borders of the one you're illustrating above are subjectively worse. In the infobox, and in your image above, they look like Canada controls all of the western coast all the way from Washington state to Alaska when that's not the case. Canterbury Tail talk 20:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Now the map you added here is actually useful due to the small scale of it and delineating the boundaries in a way that is clear and useful in the infobox context. So this isn't an entire thing against everything, it's just in the context of this article and its infobox the map isn't useful. Canterbury Tail talk 20:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- I would agree that the street view map is worse, as the details of the border are hard to see. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Are these being spammed all over the place again? We have talked about these maps a few times. Moxy-
20:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- For final words, I really disagree with all 4 people engaged in this discussion! In my opinion, interactive maps should be replaced by solid maps gradually. You are all right that we have some problems in zooming, but in future these bugs can be removed from Wikipedia and we can insert "Interactive maps" instead of "solid maps" in Wikipedia for all Infoboxes. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note you're going about this the wrong way, you're just antagonizing everyone with this attitude. However more importantly this isn't about the maps per say, it's about their usefulness in their sizes in the infoboxes. Infoboxes are expected to summarize the article, not to supplant in any way. You should read MOS:INFOBOX. They're to assist in the article, not there to be used as a set of weblinks. This is why the websites in infoboxes should show the URL as the information, not just link to it. We try to keep people inside Wikipedia as much as possible that is the ultimate objective as we can't control outside sources. Most of the maps you're adding at the country level are not helpful inside the infobox as they don't show the subject in a manner useful inside the infobox and require the user to click on them and go outside in order to get any use out of them. That's an external link, not an infobox map. Canterbury Tail talk 20:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have an idea for implementing this scenario: We use OpenStreetMap to show a map of Canada with these settings are implemented as checkboxes, and Wikipedia interactively updates maps:
- A checkbox for showing borders of Canada
- A checkbox for showing main cities
- A checkbox for showing main rivers
- A checkbox for showing main roads
- A checkbox for showing sea teritories
- A checkbox for showing UNESCO sightseeings
- A checkbox for showing main mountains
- and many other checkboxes interact with OpenStreetMap and each time a new map is rendered from OpenStreetMap to the user. After checking, an attribute is added to the map of that Infobox or if unchecked it will be removed from that Infobox map. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 21:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Can I ask how any of that is going to be visible or useful in an map a couple hundred pixels across in an infobox? You seem to be continually missing the point that this is about the usefulness of these maps in an infobox where the map is necessarily small and cannot include much data. Not its usefulness as an external link or other page. Canterbury Tail talk 21:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have an idea for implementing this scenario: We use OpenStreetMap to show a map of Canada with these settings are implemented as checkboxes, and Wikipedia interactively updates maps:
- Note you're going about this the wrong way, you're just antagonizing everyone with this attitude. However more importantly this isn't about the maps per say, it's about their usefulness in their sizes in the infoboxes. Infoboxes are expected to summarize the article, not to supplant in any way. You should read MOS:INFOBOX. They're to assist in the article, not there to be used as a set of weblinks. This is why the websites in infoboxes should show the URL as the information, not just link to it. We try to keep people inside Wikipedia as much as possible that is the ultimate objective as we can't control outside sources. Most of the maps you're adding at the country level are not helpful inside the infobox as they don't show the subject in a manner useful inside the infobox and require the user to click on them and go outside in order to get any use out of them. That's an external link, not an infobox map. Canterbury Tail talk 20:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- For final words, I really disagree with all 4 people engaged in this discussion! In my opinion, interactive maps should be replaced by solid maps gradually. You are all right that we have some problems in zooming, but in future these bugs can be removed from Wikipedia and we can insert "Interactive maps" instead of "solid maps" in Wikipedia for all Infoboxes. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Are these being spammed all over the place again? We have talked about these maps a few times. Moxy-
Hidden version of maps in infoboxes
I suppose this type of map:
{{hidden begin|title=OpenStreetMap|ta1=center}}{{Maplink|frame=yes|plain=yes|frame-width=full|frame-height=300|zoom=1|frame-lat=63.0|frame-long=-110.00
|type=shape-inverse|id=Q16
|type2=point|id2=Q16|stroke-width=3|stroke-color=#7e7e7e|fill=#7e7e7e|title2=zones|marker=country
}}{{hidden end}}that is rendered as:
which yields:
Canada | |
|---|---|
.svg) Flag | |
| Motto: A mari usque ad mare (Latin) "From Sea to Sea" | |
| Anthem: "O Canada" | |
| |
OpenStreetMap  | |
| Capital | Ottawa 45°24′N 75°40′W / 45.400°N 75.667°W |
| Largest city | Toronto |
| Official languages | |
| Demonym(s) | Canadian |
| Government | Federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy |
• Monarch | Charles III |
| Mary Simon | |
| Justin Trudeau | |
| Legislature | Parliament |
| Senate | |
| House of Commons | |
| Independence from the United Kingdom | |
| July 1, 1867 | |
| December 11, 1931 | |
| April 17, 1982 | |
| Area | |
• Total area | 9,984,670 km2 (3,855,100 sq mi) (2nd) |
• Water (%) | 11.76 (2015)[2] |
• Total land area | 9,093,507 km2 (3,511,023 sq mi) |
| Population | |
• 2023 Q4 estimate |  40,528,396[3] (37th) |
• 2021 census | 36,991,981[4] |
• Density | 4.2/km2 (10.9/sq mi) (236th) |
| GDP (PPP) | 2023 estimate |
• Total |  $2.379 trillion[5] (16th) |
• Per capita | $59,813[5] (28th) |
| GDP (nominal) | 2023 estimate |
• Total |  $2.118 trillion[5] (10th) |
• Per capita | $53,247[5] (18th) |
| Gini (2018) |  30.3[6]medium inequality |
| HDI (2021) | 0.936[7] very high (15th) |
| Currency | Canadian dollar ($) (CAD) |
| Time zone | UTC−3.5 to −8 |
• Summer (DST) | UTC−2.5 to −7 |
| Date format | yyyy-mm-dd (AD)[8] |
| Calling code | +1 |
| Internet TLD | .ca |
I really think that existance of this map, even in hidden state is very helpful. @Canterbury Tail, QuicoleJR, and Joeyconnick: Do you agree?
- I don't see that as being useful at all, especially in the very small manner in which is it inside an infobox. Canterbury Tail talk 12:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Royal Anthem". Government of Canada. August 11, 2017. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020.
- ^ "Surface water and surface water change". OECD. Archived from the original on December 9, 2018. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ "Population estimates, quarterly". Statistics Canada. December 19, 2023. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
- ^ "Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population". February 9, 2022. Archived from the original on February 9, 2022.
- ^ a b c d "World Economic Outlook Database, October 2023 Edition. (Canada)". International Monetary Fund. October 10, 2023. Archived from the original on October 13, 2023.
- ^ "Income inequality". OECD. Archived from the original on February 6, 2020. Retrieved July 16, 2021.
- ^ "Human Development Report 2021/2022" (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. September 8, 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 8, 2022.
- ^ The Government of Canada and Standards Council of Canada prescribe ISO 8601 as the country's official all-numeric date format: Public Works and Government Services Canada Translation Bureau (1997). "5.14: Dates". The Canadian style: A guide to writing and editing (Revised ed.). Dundurn Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-55002-276-6. The dd/mm/yy and mm/dd/yy formats also remain in common use; see Date and time notation in Canada.
"border=no"
I was wrong to insist (apologies to User:Moxy). I would like to discuss this (very small) problem here; in the See also paragraph, the portal is without borders, yet this is the only page in the whole of Wikipedia that has this function. Wouldn't it be better to homologate this page to all the others as well? JackkBrown (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why? Nikkimaria (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- No guesswork pls .....It does match our other top level articles.... Culture of Canada#See also, History of Canada#See also, Military history of Canada#See also, Wildlife of Canada#See also, Geography of Canada#See also, Moxy- 16:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Moxy: all right! It actually makes sense, because the borders of the Canadian flag are white (the flag represents the image of the maple leaf, but without other details). JackkBrown (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 February 2024
 | This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Canada should be spelled Kanada just like Lake Shkoder is titled Lake Skadar in Wikipedia. It's only fair that a foreign toponym be used to describe the country of Canada just like a foreign toponym is used to describe a Lake (among other things), in Albania. Thank you. 142.114.118.180 (talk) 03:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done If you are unhappy about a term used for another location, suggest you address that at that talk page rather than here. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Canada-Danish realm land border
I think it would be interesting to mention (in the opening paragraph) the land border with Greenland (Danish Realm) following the resolution of the dispute over sovereignty of Hans Island. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Think that would be undue as it is not as significant as the US border. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- While it is interesting, it is of very little significance to the topic. TFD (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- It seems to me land borders are land borders irrespective of length. They constitute geopolitical realities and worth being mentionned. In this case, it's a new geopolitical reality coupled with the resolution of a longstanding territorial dispute, albeit a relatively minor and peaceful one. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The opening paragraph is supposed to mention five or ten of the most important facts about Canada. That is shares a land border with Greenland is not one of them, certainly not in the literature about Canada. TFD (talk) 13:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The land border that Nunavut shares with the Northwest Territores and the southern provinces is more significant than the land border we share with Denmark. It's on an island that most Nunavummiut are never going to see despite it being part of Nunavut. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I hope you are aware that the land borders that Nunavut shares with the Northwest Territories and southern provinces are not international borders, regardless of length. Moreover, the border on Hans Island is formally not Nunavut's border, but Canada's border. I was simply making the point that following the resolution of the Hans Island dispute Canada gained an additional international land border. That said, it seems that there in no agreement. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely not worth putting in the lead. It’s really only a minor point. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oddly enough I was aware of that. However, based on the way the provinces act sometimes it's easy to believe that they think the NWT and Nunavut are foreign parts. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would agree with that. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 19:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I hope you are aware that the land borders that Nunavut shares with the Northwest Territories and southern provinces are not international borders, regardless of length. Moreover, the border on Hans Island is formally not Nunavut's border, but Canada's border. I was simply making the point that following the resolution of the Hans Island dispute Canada gained an additional international land border. That said, it seems that there in no agreement. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- It seems to me land borders are land borders irrespective of length. They constitute geopolitical realities and worth being mentionned. In this case, it's a new geopolitical reality coupled with the resolution of a longstanding territorial dispute, albeit a relatively minor and peaceful one. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Canada's complex relationship with the USA
KlayCax
you have removed the word "complex " inrelation to relations between Canada and the United States a few times now without trying to undersdtand why its used [1], [2]. This is a term that you will find used throughout history about this topic by academics and the media alike. Your reasoning is it needs more context...however its all in the article...in fact Canada's relationship with the USA is the most covered topic of foreign relations in the article as a whole.
Sources
- Mckenna, Peter (1999). "Canada, the United States, and the Organization of American States". American Review of Canadian Studies. 29 (3): 473–493. doi:10.1080/02722019909481638. ISSN 0272-2011.
this important and complex relationship,
- "Reconcilable Differences: A History of Canada-US Relationsn". Oxford University Press.
Reconcilable Differences provides students with a contemporary look at the often complex relationship between Canada and the United States from 1763 to today, using the most recent scholarship available.
- "Canada and the United States". The Canadian Encyclopedia. June 11, 2020.
"The Americans are our best friends whether we like it or not." This statement, uttered in the House of Commons by Robert Thompson, the leader of the Social Credit Party early in the 1960s, perhaps best captures the essence of Canada's complex relationship with its nearest neighbour.
- Shull, Aaron; Tandt, Michael Den (December 13, 2021). "Is US President Joe Biden Good or Bad for Canada?". Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Canadians have a complex relationship with the United States.
- "Dispute Resolution in the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement: One Element of a Complex Relationship". McGill Law Journal. September 18, 2018.
- Hale, Geoffrey (November 1, 2012). "So Near Yet So Far". UBC Press.
How do politicians, diplomats, and interest groups negotiate the tangled web of Canada–US relations? So Near Yet So Far provides in-depth look at the multiple dimensions of this complex relationship..
- "A Canadian Agenda for the USA: Obama and Beyond". Canadian Global Affairs Institute. August 1, 2018.
Complex and Complicated but Mutually-Beneficial Relationship Ours is a very complex relationship built, as John F. Kennedy remarked, on ties of history, geography, economics, security and deep people-to-people relationships.
- ""The U.S. Studies Program at The University of British Columbia will significantly increase our understanding of the United States and its institutions and policies through critical research, teaching, and public outreach, making a tremendous contribution to Canada's complex relationship with the U.S."". usstudies. January 16, 2013.
Moxy- 15:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I too wondered why it was used? But it kinda flew under my radar. You bring up a good point. I assumed it was issues like the softwood dispute; the NAFTA re-negotiations; the arctic dispute; Canada looking to claim Hawaii, but the USA getting there like a mere 1 week earlier (so I heard); the burnings of the Parliament/White House; FATCA legislation that caught up so many Canadians in the US tax reporting obligations; however as you said without a clearcut explanation it is all conjecture. CaribDigita (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- We link the main article on the topic, provide sources and cover the topic all over the article. That said Canada looking to claim Hawaii,?Moxy- 17:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- We link the main article on the topic, provide sources and cover the topic all over the article. That said Canada looking to claim Hawaii,?Moxy-
- I too wondered why it was used? But it kinda flew under my radar. You bring up a good point. I assumed it was issues like the softwood dispute; the NAFTA re-negotiations; the arctic dispute; Canada looking to claim Hawaii, but the USA getting there like a mere 1 week earlier (so I heard); the burnings of the Parliament/White House; FATCA legislation that caught up so many Canadians in the US tax reporting obligations; however as you said without a clearcut explanation it is all conjecture. CaribDigita (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot find it now. There was a radio interview about the 'Turks & Caicos -- Canada political union or affiliation' idea some years ago, and I believe it was either by CTV or CBC and they delved into a fact about a captain from Canada setting off to claim Hawaii for the British Empire but the captain from the USA arrived one week earlier and that's how it wound up a US state instead. CaribDigita (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 February 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
After Canada, add officially the Dominion of Canada, as is there for all other countries 142.189.71.71 (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done: “Dominion of Canada” not the name; please see Name of Canada. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 February 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Update the Canada's population rank from 37th to 36th. This is due to Ukraine's population falling from 36th to 39th, according to the list of countries and dependencies by population. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 March 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to edit Canada to update the countries it borders because it included Denmark and also including new territories (Hans Island) end of the Whiskey War 2001:4455:55E:B500:619E:579:2508:5C19 (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Could other editors please have a look at a new article, Humanitarian crisis of family reunification in Quebec. The article's creator has made several lengthy edits to Canadian articles which would benefit from review by editors familiar with Quebec. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 March 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Canada to Kanada 2.109.102.68 (talk) 11:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 12:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: This requires a consensus that frankly I don't think has a snowball's chance in hell of passing. Good day—RetroCosmos talk 22:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Area of Canada
| Total area | 9,984,670 km2 (3,855,100 sq mi) (2nd) |
|---|---|
| • Water (%) | 11.76 (2015) |
| • Total land area | 9,093,507 km2 (3,511,023 sq mi) |
Do the "total area" and the "water" area include Hudson Bay? And do they include parts of the three oceans bounding Canada? If the latter are included how far from land do they extend? Michael Hardy (talk) 00:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Freshwater calculations only. That said we're one of the weirdos where our territorial claims are larger than our economic zone... Exclusive economic zone of Canada. Moxy🍁 01:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 March 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Update population from 40,528,396 (2023 Q4 estimate) to 40,769,890 (2024 Q1 estimate). ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Shadow311 (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- The reliable source is already in the article/infobox, it's the same source that's currently being used. No change of sources is being asked, just an update to reflect the source. Canterbury Tail talk 15:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Done ..😀Moxy🍁 17:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please note the archive for the StatsCan source must be updated when we update the population; otherwise, it points to a version with the wrong population listed. Thanks. —Joeyconnick (talk) 19:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 March 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Xiedingjian (talk) 23:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Based the information from Statistic Canada on March 30 2024, the population of Canada is 41,013,253. Webpage : Population of Canada (real-time model)https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2018005-eng.htm
- We use quarterly statistics...https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000901.. Thus we don't have to update it on a daily basis.Moxy🍁 00:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 April 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It seems to me that the arrow for the population estimate should be increase neutral and a positive increase (green) for the census population. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- The arrow for the census population should be changed from neutral (grey) to positive (green). The population has increased, confirmed by the change from the 2016 census to the 2021 census. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 02:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- All country articles use grey arrows for the infobox population tables, whether there has been an increase or decrease in population B3251 (talk) 02:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes... that makes sense, as a population increase is not necessarily a positive change in all contexts. —Joeyconnick (talk) 17:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- All country articles use grey arrows for the infobox population tables, whether there has been an increase or decrease in population B3251 (talk) 02:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- The arrow for the census population should be changed from neutral (grey) to positive (green). The population has increased, confirmed by the change from the 2016 census to the 2021 census. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 02:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 April 2024 (GINI update)
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The GINI index value is outdated.
Change GINI index value from 30.3 to 29.2 [1]
OR
Change GINI index value from 30.3 to 28.8 [2]
???????
Do not know which source should be used but the numbers are still lower than the 2018 one.
IamTiabeanie (talk) 05:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure either, but the current number is based on the OECD source so that may be a good choice, for lack of better alternative. ASUKITE 17:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done ASUKITE 17:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ OECD (2024), Income inequality (indicator). doi: 10.1787/459aa7f1-en (Accessed on 16 April 2024)
- ^ Statistics Canada. Table 11-10-0134-01 Gini coefficients of adjusted market, total and after-tax income. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/1110013401-eng
Canadian-Danish Realm Border
This was discussed last in February but I wish to bring it up again. Almost all country pages on Wikipedia have mentions of said nations bordering countries, or even just countries close by, in their lead. Exceptions include large countries like China and Russia with significant amounts of bordering nations, but both still mention the amount of countries bordered and provides a link to the their respective borders.
The Canadian-Danish Realm border, though small, is still an international border between sovereign states that should be mentioned in the lead. It is also apparently the third shortest land border in the world, which is notable. Zinderboff(talk) 15:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- I had re-created Borders of Canada (which matches the idea of Borders of Mexico and Borders of the United States. Except the Canadian one was merely reduced to mere redirect to Canada-US relations. CaribDigita (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Problem we have is this is historically insignificant..... thus does not belong in the lead about a country. The lead is for significant facts and historical events...... not a laundry list. I would suggest the other articles need to be brought up to FA level as seen here.Moxy🍁 22:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Having a border with another country isn't really historically insignificant, it is a present fact. The process of acquiring said border probably isn't notable enough for the lead but not the border itself.
Fellow FAs India and Cameroon both dedicates most of their first paragraph mentioning all bordering countries, along with even maritime borders. When this was promoted to FA in 2006 this border wasn't a thing in existence, it is now. Canada is the only country article I have seen which lead doesn't mention all its bordering nations in some way. Zinderboff(talk) 02:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)- India is a horrible example of an article to fallow.... Best we don't simply have a laundry list of examples... since we list the ocean territories. I simply don't see the need to list all 10 countries..... this isn't a geography article. That said let's see what others say. Moxy🍁 02:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- One of the reasons that borders get mentioned in the other articles is that those borders have major political and trade significance. India has been at war with two of its neighbouring countries, China and Pakistan, and was involved in the Pakistan civil war that resulted in Bangladesh. There are also trade issues between those countries, through their borders. Russia borders several countries that once were part of the USSR and also has a major war on with one of its neighbours, which in turn has caused one of its other neighbours, Finland, to join NATO. The borders of these countries have a major role in the internal politics and external affairs.
- The Canadian border with the Danish realm has none of those features. Hans Island is remote and unpopulated. There are no trade implications. That portion of Nunavut and Greenland have very low populations. There are no conflicts over the island that are likely to lead to war; the Whiskey War was a civilized trading échange of flags, whiskey and schnapps. Denmark and Canada are NATO allies.
- A short border on an uninhabited island, distant from most population centres, with no trade implications, and no military threats, is not sufficiently notable to appear in the lead, anymore than the maritime boundary with France. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- India is a horrible example of an article to fallow.... Best we don't simply have a laundry list of examples... since we list the ocean territories. I simply don't see the need to list all 10 countries..... this isn't a geography article. That said let's see what others say. Moxy🍁 02:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agree strongly with Moxy... this is 100% not lead-worthy. It can be mentioned elsewhere in the article or in other relevant articles but given how remote and uninhabited the area where the border is located is, it is clearly not suitable to mention it in this article's lead. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Having a border with another country isn't really historically insignificant, it is a present fact. The process of acquiring said border probably isn't notable enough for the lead but not the border itself.
- Problem we have is this is historically insignificant..... thus does not belong in the lead about a country. The lead is for significant facts and historical events...... not a laundry list. I would suggest the other articles need to be brought up to FA level as seen here.Moxy🍁 22:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 May 2024
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the "Government and Politics" section, change "centre-left leaning Liberal Party of Canada" to "centre to centre-left leaning Liberal Party of Canada". This reflects the consensus in other articles that the Liberal Party of Canada is as much (if not more so) centrist as it is centre-left. Thecolonpagesaretoocomplicated (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- No need...... explain in the following sentence. Moxy🍁 22:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Demographics list removed
Hi. I noticed that the demographics list of the Canadian population is missing (or was removed) from the top of the main page on Canada. Is there a reason for this? I remember it listed there not too long and is shown when you click on the "Canadian" link under Demonym. I think this is a good way to instantly understand who the Canadian people are so I think it should be included back in. 47.23.177.234 (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Both Religion and Demographics have been deleted. I think it's a useful information, but regardless of what I prefer, not having them will make the article inconsistent with the rest of country articles. LibIchtnatz (talk) 14:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Error in table of "Largest metropolitan areas in Canada"
In the table titled "Largest metropolitan areas in Canada" there is an error: the column titled "Municipal pop." should say "Metropolitan pop.", as these are all populations of metropolitan areas.
For example, Montreal's 4.3 million is its metropolitan population as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_census_metropolitan_areas_and_agglomerations_in_Canada, compared to its municipal population of 1.8 million as per List of the largest municipalities in Canada by population. As the side is extended-protected I couldn't quickly figure out how to do it myself or make an edit request. Thanks! 142.126.42.190 (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Urgh... unfortunately that is generated by
{{Template:Largest metropolitan areas of Canada}}which uses what I would definitely call a shitty template,{{Template:Largest cities}}(which has been put up multiple times for deletion and I can very much understand why), which says it has options to switch to refer to metropolitan areas but which I, at least, definitely cannot get it to do so. I don't have template editor rights so I can't see if there's an actual error in "Largest cities" but its documentation is... uhm... limited. It might be that making List of cities in Canada by metropolitan population redirect to List of census metropolitan areas and agglomerations in Canada could make it work. - I have, at least, made "Municipal pop." link to List of census metropolitan areas and agglomerations in Canada instead of to a list of lists (🙄) page because you're correct: we are listing the cities by the metro populations and not their municipal ones, otherwise Vancouver would not be number 3.
- Happy if anyone who knows more template wizardry can jump in and improve the situation... am thinking we should maybe just change
{{Template:Largest metropolitan areas of Canada}}to not rely on the "Largest cities" template. —Joeyconnick (talk) 17:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Update Canadian population
| This edit request to Canada has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Update Canadian population from 40,769,890 (2024 Q1) to 41,012,563 (2024 Q2). It's from the same source updated (Population estimates, quarterly). ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 12:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done as seen here..... Drop archive link as this has been a live web page for 10 years and an archive page will not verify the updated information.Moxy🍁 19:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I reverted because, as happened last time, the archive in the citation was not updated. Last time I fixed it myself—this time, please update the archive attached to the citation when updating the population. —Joeyconnick (talk) 21:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good we'll see who will get to it. Moxy🍁 21:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I reverted because, as happened last time, the archive in the citation was not updated. Last time I fixed it myself—this time, please update the archive attached to the citation when updating the population. —Joeyconnick (talk) 21:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Tollens (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect thank you..... I take it there's some sort of tool for archive websites? Moxy🍁 20:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes there definitely is. It's all over Wikipedia. (There are others but that is the main one.) —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect thank you..... I take it there's some sort of tool for archive websites? Moxy🍁 20:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
GDP per capita is smaller due to current population
Current government estimate puts Canada's population at 41.4 million, likely to cross 42 million by January 2025 with current growth rates. But due to the large amount of immigration being ethnic Jatt Sikhs, the GDP per capita has gone down due to dead-end job salaries in most positions and more people. 2605:8D80:405:84B1:7424:BB2:558B:4A6A (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Introduction Edit request
Canada now has an official border with Denmark on Hans island, I think this should be included here (see: https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/hans-island-border/) Cjohnson70 (talk) 03:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Already included in the Geography section of the article. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Change needed in the sub-section on Religion
In the sub-section on Religion (Section: Demographics) there's the indication that the monarch holds the title of Defender of the Faith. This is no longer the case since the proclamation issued on 8 January 2024. ZeusMinerva25 (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
is the Flag correct?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
the maple leaf is not a legal symbol of canada ,so is there any official evidence that the maple leaf is actually legally on the flag? UnsungHistory (talk) 15:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- pls see National symbols of Canada or this source. Moxy🍁 15:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's not an official symbol of Canada on its own, but it's legally and officially adopted as part of the flag as your source clearly states. It's just not a legal symbol if it's just a maple leaf. Canterbury Tail talk 20:08, 1 August 2024 (UTC)