Jump to content

Talk:Attack of Mark's Clone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAttack of Mark's Clone has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 19, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Attack of Mark's Clone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 20:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "The following day, Twayne Boneraper has hired a new assistant, Tad, to do his dirty work." Change to "The following day, Twayne Boneraper hires a new assistant named Tad to do his dirty work."
    "Executive producer Daniel Powell said that Clone Mark "glove slaps everyone, smoking a cigarette instead of putting it out before the office"." Reworking into: "Executive producer Daniel Powell said that Clone Mark "glove slaps everyone [and smokes] a cigarette instead of putting it out before the office"."
    "The episode went down the previous episode..." Change to "The episode marked a ratings decrease from the previous episode..."
    "Charles Webb of MTV was favored it over season one episodes, which had "its emphasis on generating a gag a minute within a paper-thin plot"." Change to "Charles Webb of MTV favored it over season one episodes, which emphasized "generating a gag a minute within a paper-thin plot"."
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

On Hold for seven days to straighten out issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I just did the small corrections myself. All fixed! Pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]