Jump to content

Talk:6:02 AM EST

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article6:02 AM EST has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star6:02 AM EST is part of the Fringe (season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 11, 2011Good article nomineeListed
July 26, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:6:02 AM EST/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Queenieacoustic (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Production

[edit]
  1. Since The A.V. Club is the only outlet that described the episodes as a "three-part third-season finale," the implication that "some" outlets referred to it as that seems a bit confusing.

Reception

[edit]

Ratings

[edit]
  1. "with a 1.2/4 ratings share 18–49." Slightly clumsy. You need to address that 18-49 refers to the demographic's age.
  2. "This was 14 percent fewer viewers than the previous week," "This was" sounds a bit clunky to me. You can replace it with "It was seen by," for example.

In conclusion

[edit]

And that's pretty much it, only three minor issues and it's ready for GA. I'll put the article on hold for seven days. Good luck! Queenieacoustic (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Thanks again for the review! Much appreciated, Ruby2010 comment! 19:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Passed! Queenieacoustic (talk) 19:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 6:02 AM EST. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 6:02 AM EST. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]