Talk:2004 enlargement of the European Union

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 37 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Merge

We need to pull data in here, I suggest brining in Accession of Poland to the European Union to this article to bring the data together. Poland was the largest of these and hence the areas overlap a tad. I suggest the same for the Romania and Bulgaria articles so we have a 2004 and 2007 article, then maybe ones for the previous enlargements if we have the data.- _J.Logan`^t: 15:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having done this should we perhaps rename the article to somthing like the "Fifth enlargement of the European Union" as it deals with Bulgaria and Romania who joined not in 2004, but in 2007. Further more according to the official website of the European Commission, the signature of the Accession Treaty of Romania and Bulgaria "marks the completion of the fifth enlargement of the EU". Consequently, the enlargement in 2004 was only the first part of the Fifth Enlargement.P.Marlow (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Move

2004 enlargement of the European Union → Fifth enlargement of the European Union — No space has been added by the IP who added the move request, but I would oppose it as 2004 enlargement of the European Union is much clearer. YeshuaDavid (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was no consensus to move this page. Dekimasuよ! 00:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.poland.gov.pl/Poland%E2%80%99s,way,to,UE,458.html
- In 2004 enlargement of the European Union on 2011-05-25 07:51:10, 404 Not Found
- In 2004 enlargement of the European Union on 2011-06-11 12:30:59, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another merge request

Essentially repeating the same as what was wrote on the A8 countries page, a proposal back in March by an IP was made to merge that article in to this citing massive overlap, the two should be merged together for said reason and being basically the same topic. A re-direct can be created in the A8 articles place to here. Tweedle (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colors in Progress: Acquis Chapters Section

Hi! I'm taking a look at some of the overcolored cleanup tags and was wondering if anyone could explain the "x"s in the acquis chapter part of the progress table? It seems like they mean "closed chapter" but all of them are "x"s so I'm not sure why there's that guide? Is it meant to be consistent with another article?

I would like to replace the "x"s with the meanings for the color-coded legend so that it is understandable by colorblind readers but I don't want to replace them if I'm not understanding why they are there. (If I did this I would put a note that all of the chapters were closed). SomeoneDreaming (talk) 01:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]