Talk:.nai
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]The proposal to merge (remove) does not appear to extend to other pages documenting well-known pending linguistic and cultural top-level domain applications, e.g., .eus, .gal, .bzh, .scot, .cym(ri) or .cym(ru) or .wales, ... or to pages documenting well-known pending regional top-level domain applications, e.g., .quebec, .lat, ...
If the proposal to merge (remove) targets an application brought by several indigenous governments for a single, jointly policied and cooperatively managed top-level domain, and no others, the policy rational should be clarified.
If the proposal to merge (remove) targets a larger class of the ICANN estimated 500 to 1,000 applications it expects, possibly for similarity of possible pages, for reasons of scale, again, the policy rational should be clarified.
Ebw+nai (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on .nai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101207111203/https://nai.nic-naa.net:80/ to http://nai.nic-naa.net
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101207111203/https://nai.nic-naa.net:80/ to http://nai.nic-naa.net
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)