User contributions for Studentoftruth

30 April 2015

• 19:1419:14, 30 April 2015 diff hist −79 m Houri →Spouses of the deceased being recreated as houris: It does not refer to any another kind of houris (i.e. women or jinn who never had Earthly lives)...see previous discussions...
• 19:0819:08, 30 April 2015 diff hist −551 m Houri Ibn Kathir is under commentators....
• 19:0619:06, 30 April 2015 diff hist +63 Houri →Damrah bin Habib, apud Artar bin Al-Mundhir: Clarifying that the question was regarding the verse of houri...
• 19:0319:03, 30 April 2015 diff hist +114 Houri →Abu Ubayda: Clarifying that the verse of recreated women was referring to houri.
• 18:5318:53, 30 April 2015 diff hist +1,131 Houri Introduction is misleading. Houris are not only human but also jinn...and they are not to serve...as the text says they are the believers themselves...

8 December 2012

• 12:0512:05, 8 December 2012 diff hist +3,732 Talk:Houri No edit summary
• 11:2611:26, 8 December 2012 diff hist +662 Houri →Quran: Reinserting Verses...Verse refers to repeating the form of creation of man and wife (and likely their love between themselves) as it is in this life again in paradise. See discussion for more details.

5 August 2011

• 23:1423:14, 5 August 2011 diff hist −135 m Houri Undid revision 440138962 by Gluonman (talk) ----> Irrelevant

11 June 2011

• 05:3405:34, 11 June 2011 diff hist +21 Houri Undid revision 433284446 by MyTwoCopperCoins (talk) Houri is a resurrected human,,,,in Qur'an...See discussion...

12 May 2011

• 05:0505:05, 12 May 2011 diff hist +19 Houri →Views

11 April 2011

• 22:4522:45, 11 April 2011 diff hist −80 Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 22:3822:38, 11 April 2011 diff hist +43 Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 22:3522:35, 11 April 2011 diff hist +6 m Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 22:3122:31, 11 April 2011 diff hist −4 m Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 22:2922:29, 11 April 2011 diff hist +7,449 Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 20:0820:08, 11 April 2011 diff hist −4 m Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 20:0520:05, 11 April 2011 diff hist +11 m Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 20:0220:02, 11 April 2011 diff hist +1,435 Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 19:4519:45, 11 April 2011 diff hist −93 Houri Houri is plural and not feminine in gender --- Houri does not mean or has ever been translated "feminine in gender"

8 April 2011

• 04:4004:40, 8 April 2011 diff hist +21 m Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 04:3604:36, 8 April 2011 diff hist +595 Talk:Houri →Classical Arabic usage
• 04:2804:28, 8 April 2011 diff hist +4,480 Talk:Houri →Confusing intro
• 04:0804:08, 8 April 2011 diff hist −90 m Houri Nowhere in any translation houri is translated as --"female in gender"--

3 April 2011

• 07:2707:27, 3 April 2011 diff hist −682 Houri Removing the inserted words in quoted phrases which change their original meaning....Read the female/male in the discussion.

26 March 2011

• 03:5103:51, 26 March 2011 diff hist +213 Houri The sections have their own titles, deletion of them creates confusion as they do not fall under hadith.

24 February 2011

• 08:3708:37, 24 February 2011 diff hist +19 Houri This is not a view about what the statement means but it criticizes the authenticity of the attributed statement

14 February 2011

• 06:4206:42, 14 February 2011 diff hist +983 Houri Undid revision 413547273 by 94.96.3.192 (talk)

11 February 2011

• 19:4819:48, 11 February 2011 diff hist +1,128 Houri Replacing ibid
• 10:5610:56, 11 February 2011 diff hist −384 Houri Removed - it says nothing, adds nothing, misquoted, equivalence to women is their husband resurrected as virgin...see other passages...where houri is defined as someone resurrected in the hereafter...

6 December 2010

• 01:2501:25, 6 December 2010 diff hist −447 Houri Undid revision 400248374 by 124.197.46.153 (talk) No reference, irrelevant personal opinions

13 June 2010

• 20:4420:44, 13 June 2010 diff hist +1,217 Houri Supernaturally Beautiful??? What is this a summary...baseless adjective...? Do a better job...

24 January 2010

• 19:2919:29, 24 January 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:Houri →Confusing intro
• 19:2719:27, 24 January 2010 diff hist −414 Talk:Houri →Confusing intro
• 19:1019:10, 24 January 2010 diff hist +5,461 Talk:Houri →Confusing intro

10 December 2009

• 01:5201:52, 10 December 2009 diff hist −1 m Houri →Qur'an
• 01:5101:51, 10 December 2009 diff hist −203 Houri →Qur'an: The point of verse is mates are of the same kind, humans for humans, and jinns for jinns....and that this will be the same in hereafter when life is brought again
• 01:3701:37, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1,366 Houri Editions add ambiguity already explained in the discussion...see discussion...going back to the previous version

11 August 2009

• 14:3514:35, 11 August 2009 diff hist +76 m Houri →Description
• 14:2714:27, 11 August 2009 diff hist −108 m Houri →Description: Wrong translation there is no female as in word and it's the same phrase for both quotes
• 14:1614:16, 11 August 2009 diff hist +158 Houri →Description: Childfree or not childfree + moving quotes from the wrong sections
• 02:2502:25, 11 August 2009 diff hist +4 m Houri →Sexual intercourse between a husband and a wife in paradise
• 02:2202:22, 11 August 2009 diff hist −7 m Houri →Sexual intercourse between a husband and a wife in paradise
• 02:1802:18, 11 August 2009 diff hist +83 Houri →Sex in paradise: Clarification and specification of the type of sexual intercourse as mentioned in the reference cited
• 02:1102:11, 11 August 2009 diff hist +1,832 Houri No reason stated for removing cited sources?

9 August 2009

• 04:1604:16, 9 August 2009 diff hist +63 m Houri Undid NONSENSE and CHANGING REFERENCES revision 306360010 by 202.156.14.198 (talk)

16 July 2009

• 06:5706:57, 16 July 2009 diff hist −222 Houri Statement is missing reference + minor changes

16 June 2009

• 13:1513:15, 16 June 2009 diff hist +161 Houri Mysterious Deletion Undid revision 296747428 by 212.234.178.122 (talk)

19 April 2009

• 06:5406:54, 19 April 2009 diff hist −205 Houri →European usage: removed uncited source

4 April 2009

• 05:5405:54, 4 April 2009 diff hist −72 m Houri what is the reference doing in the text?

22 December 2008

• 20:5420:54, 22 December 2008 diff hist +12 Houri Although meaning remains the same, it is the wrong reference. The changed meaning is open to ambiguity, which have been explained in the discussion.