User contributions for Army1987

28 January 2009

• 22:2722:27, 28 January 2009 diff hist −203 User talk:Army1987 farewell
• 22:2422:24, 28 January 2009 diff hist −5,619 User:Army1987 farewell
• 22:1622:16, 28 January 2009 diff hist −36,046 User talk:Army1987 archiving everything
• 22:1622:16, 28 January 2009 diff hist +36,043 N User talk:Army1987/Archive 3 archiving everything
• 22:1422:14, 28 January 2009 diff hist −339 Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Members →WikiProject Physics participants: rm myself
• 22:1422:14, 28 January 2009 diff hist −277 m Wikipedia:WikiProject Led Zeppelin/Participants →Participants: rm myself
• 13:2913:29, 28 January 2009 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →It's the square brackets, stupid!: what the hell?
• 13:2713:27, 28 January 2009 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →It's the square brackets, stupid!: this one wrong, too
• 13:2513:25, 28 January 2009 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →It's the square brackets, stupid!: wrong place for my comment
• 13:2313:23, 28 January 2009 diff hist +1,017 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →It's the square brackets, stupid!: Hans Adler, get real.
• 12:3112:31, 28 January 2009 diff hist +517 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 × 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm × 90 cm": According to that logic, we shouldn't ban contractions such as "aren't" either
• 02:1902:19, 28 January 2009 diff hist +416 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 × 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm × 90 cm": But what's wrong with Woodstone's proposal?
• 01:3701:37, 28 January 2009 diff hist +1,215 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Son of Autoformatting III: Electric Boogaloo: Er... My point in quoting that figure is that there actually are much fewer than eight million editors on Wikipedia.

27 January 2009

• 23:4423:44, 27 January 2009 diff hist +779 User:Army1987/monobook.js break current
• 23:3623:36, 27 January 2009 diff hist +4 m William Rowan Hamilton →Commemorations of Hamilton: link fix
• 23:3223:32, 27 January 2009 diff hist −54 Template:Radic making it even simpler
• 23:1723:17, 27 January 2009 diff hist +946 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Son of Autoformatting III: Electric Boogaloo: comment
• 22:5222:52, 27 January 2009 diff hist +461 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics →Does the Introduction to special relativity need massive reorganization?: new section
• 22:5022:50, 27 January 2009 diff hist +278 Talk:Introduction to special relativity →A radical reorganization of this could be useful: sig
• 22:4822:48, 27 January 2009 diff hist +2,592 Talk:Introduction to special relativity →A radical reorganization of this could be useful: new section
• 22:2322:23, 27 January 2009 diff hist +12 Introduction to special relativity this is such a mess
• 22:1922:19, 27 January 2009 diff hist 0 m Quark →Classification: The "Show preview" button exists for a reason. Please use it.
• 22:1722:17, 27 January 2009 diff hist +466 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casimir cones →Casimir cones: not even that
• 22:0722:07, 27 January 2009 diff hist +964 Template talk:Xt →Accessibility: more
• 21:1521:15, 27 January 2009 diff hist +610 Template talk:Xt →Accessibility: re
• 20:5720:57, 27 January 2009 diff hist 0 m Helmholtz equation →Paraxial approximation: i for imag. unit
• 20:5620:56, 27 January 2009 diff hist +15 m Helmholtz equation →Paraxial approximation: formatting
• 20:5420:54, 27 January 2009 diff hist +34 Helmholtz equation →Paraxial form: "form" sounds like it's equivalent, using "approximation" and "part"
• 20:4820:48, 27 January 2009 diff hist −1 m Helmholtz equation →Paraxial form: using i for imaginary unit, for consistence w the rest
• 20:2620:26, 27 January 2009 diff hist +43 User:Army1987 + Queen and reverse alph. order
• 20:0420:04, 27 January 2009 diff hist −23 Led Zeppelin IV →Album cover and inside sleeve: the source doesn't relate the hypothesized black dog with the song with that title in any way
• 20:0120:01, 27 January 2009 diff hist +397 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 × 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm × 90 cm": Yes. (Though I guess that {{xt|by}} should be surrounded by hyphens not spaces? I'm not sure about that, though...)
• 19:5519:55, 27 January 2009 diff hist +164 Template talk:Xt →Accessibility: or with...
• 19:5119:51, 27 January 2009 diff hist +1,053 Template talk:Xt →Accessibility: re
• 18:2018:20, 27 January 2009 diff hist +3 m Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 × 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm × 90 cm": typos
• 18:1818:18, 27 January 2009 diff hist +13 User:Army1987 {{SA-mostexcellentgrognard}}
• 18:1718:17, 27 January 2009 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 × 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm × 90 cm": typo
• 18:1518:15, 27 January 2009 diff hist +691 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 × 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm × 90 cm": re
• 17:5117:51, 27 January 2009 diff hist +682 Template talk:Xt →Accessibility: OK, OK. Considering that the <samp> element is disabled in wikitext, what "appropriate HTML element" would you use?
• 17:4217:42, 27 January 2009 diff hist +439 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics →Casimir cones: new section
• 17:4017:40, 27 January 2009 diff hist +458 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casimir cones {{subst:delsort|Science}}<small>—~~~~</small>
• 17:3917:39, 27 January 2009 diff hist +811 User talk:Coolug AfD Casimir cones
• 17:3717:37, 27 January 2009 diff hist +50 Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science →Science: {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casimir cones}}
• 17:3417:34, 27 January 2009 diff hist +50 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 January 27 Casimir cones
• 17:3217:32, 27 January 2009 diff hist +1,296 N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casimir cones Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casimir cones
• 17:1617:16, 27 January 2009 diff hist +2 Swampman {{quote}}
• 15:4215:42, 27 January 2009 diff hist +301 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal not supported by RFC: Such as ...?
• 13:0613:06, 27 January 2009 diff hist +1,133 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 x 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm x 90 cm": it *is* a formula
• 12:0912:09, 27 January 2009 diff hist +462 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Proposal: Delete guideline that bans "70 x 90 cm" and mandates "70 cm x 90 cm": re
• 12:0112:01, 27 January 2009 diff hist +791 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Bot-assisted compliance: What do you ''really'' mean?