User contributions for 93.36.190.141

22 October 2018

• 17:2817:28, 22 October 2018 diff hist −7 Talk:Asian fetish →This Entire Article Is Racist
• 17:2717:27, 22 October 2018 diff hist +340 Talk:Asian fetish →This Entire Article Is Racist

15 October 2018

• 12:5212:52, 15 October 2018 diff hist −1,109 Cabiria The controversy section is made up. The two sources provided talk ONLY of the movie’s aestetics. To say the movie or d’annunzio are controversial (neither of them is, as Cabiria is teched in filmmaking school and he is celebrated everywhere in italy) and to go as far as to claim this movie is fascist (when the movie is from 1914 and fascism was created in 1922) or to even compare it to birth of a nation, sources are needed, which here are not provided. The two sources talk of something else Tag: section blanking
• 12:3012:30, 15 October 2018 diff hist −20 Andrew Brunson No edit summary

26 September 2018

• 21:2721:27, 26 September 2018 diff hist +326 User talk:AfroThundr3007730 →Sorry for the trouble on Contributor Covenant wiki page.
• 21:1021:10, 26 September 2018 diff hist +121 User talk:AfroThundr3007730 →Sorry for the trouble on Contributor Covenant wiki page.
• 21:0921:09, 26 September 2018 diff hist +452 User talk:AfroThundr3007730 →Sorry for the trouble on Contributor Covenant wiki page.
• 20:1620:16, 26 September 2018 diff hist −58 Contributor Covenant grammar fixed
• 20:1620:16, 26 September 2018 diff hist +53 Contributor Covenant Undid revision 861351044 by 93.36.190.141 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 20:1520:15, 26 September 2018 diff hist −53 Contributor Covenant →Issues raised by critics
• 20:1220:12, 26 September 2018 diff hist +71 Contributor Covenant →Success
• 20:0920:09, 26 September 2018 diff hist +71 Contributor Covenant This is what the source says
• 20:0720:07, 26 September 2018 diff hist −12 Contributor Covenant →Success
• 20:0620:06, 26 September 2018 diff hist −63 Contributor Covenant No edit summary
• 20:0520:05, 26 September 2018 diff hist −136 Contributor Covenant No edit summary
• 20:0220:02, 26 September 2018 diff hist 0 Contributor Covenant No edit summary
• 20:0120:01, 26 September 2018 diff hist −945 Contributor Covenant Repetition of lead phrase
• 20:0020:00, 26 September 2018 diff hist +4 Contributor Covenant →Criticism
• 20:0020:00, 26 September 2018 diff hist +722 Contributor Covenant Relevant as per Eric S. Raymond reporting on it Tag: Undo
• 19:5819:58, 26 September 2018 diff hist +125 Contributor Covenant More context given, otherwise why should Jones cite this instance?
• 19:5519:55, 26 September 2018 diff hist −498 Contributor Covenant This should be the first sentence as it clarify the argument of the paragraph. The meritocracy part, written like this, is OT Tag: references removed
• 19:5419:54, 26 September 2018 diff hist +104 Contributor Covenant Jay Maynard claims this as per sources Tag: references removed
• 19:3919:39, 26 September 2018 diff hist −25 Contributor Covenant Reverting POV edit: you can't say he "agrees" it he says the complete opposite. Faithfullness to sources before everythin
• 19:2119:21, 26 September 2018 diff hist +12 Contributor Covenant →Negative reception
• 19:2019:20, 26 September 2018 diff hist +1 Contributor Covenant →Negative reception
• 19:2019:20, 26 September 2018 diff hist +2 Contributor Covenant →Negative reception
• 19:1819:18, 26 September 2018 diff hist +315 Contributor Covenant →Negative reception
• 19:1519:15, 26 September 2018 diff hist +130 Contributor Covenant →Negative reception
• 19:1219:12, 26 September 2018 diff hist 0 Contributor Covenant →Negative reception
• 19:0019:00, 26 September 2018 diff hist −564 Contributor Covenant the rewording done by tnordloh wasn't faithfull to the sources: words can be change but the concept should be in line with the source

11 August 2018

• 10:1010:10, 11 August 2018 diff hist +10 Talk:Sarah Jeong →Change "social media" in «(her) hiring sparked a strongly negative reaction in (...) social media» to "conservative social media" OR "some social media"
• 10:0810:08, 11 August 2018 diff hist +481 Talk:Sarah Jeong →Change "social media" in «(her) hiring sparked a strongly negative reaction in (...) social media» to "conservative social media" OR "some social media"

8 August 2018

• 15:2115:21, 8 August 2018 diff hist +624 Talk:Sarah Jeong →RfC: Separate section on tweets?
• 15:1315:13, 8 August 2018 diff hist +205 Talk:Sarah Jeong →Proposal to include quotes in the article
• 15:1015:10, 8 August 2018 diff hist +262 Talk:Sarah Jeong →RfC: Separate section on tweets?

4 August 2018

• 10:3310:33, 4 August 2018 diff hist +400 Talk:Sarah Jeong →Alternate proposal

29 July 2018

• 12:5812:58, 29 July 2018 diff hist −52 The Death and Return of Superman No edit summary

22 July 2018

• 15:5515:55, 22 July 2018 diff hist +87 Post-truth politics No edit summary
• 08:5608:56, 22 July 2018 diff hist +7 Futurism →1920s and 1930s
• 08:5508:55, 22 July 2018 diff hist −39 Futurism →1920s and 1930s

4 July 2018

• 17:4217:42, 4 July 2018 diff hist +5 Talk:Bimbo →Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:4017:40, 4 July 2018 diff hist +370 Talk:Bimbo →Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:3717:37, 4 July 2018 diff hist 0 Talk:Bimbo →Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:3517:35, 4 July 2018 diff hist +98 Talk:Bimbo →Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:0617:06, 4 July 2018 diff hist +127 User talk:Bagumba →Bimbo
• 17:0417:04, 4 July 2018 diff hist +2,043 Talk:Bimbo →Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 16:2116:21, 4 July 2018 diff hist +2,537 User talk:Bagumba →Daniel Kickert
• 16:1816:18, 4 July 2018 diff hist +1 User talk:331dot/Archive 6 No edit summary
• 16:1816:18, 4 July 2018 diff hist +2,537 User talk:331dot/Archive 6 →User:Duckadea
• 15:5215:52, 4 July 2018 diff hist +933 User talk:Flyer22 Frozen you can't delete other user's messages. Tag: Undo