User contributions for 50.80.139.102

6 July 2011

• 10:0710:07, 6 July 2011 diff hist −5,419 User talk:50.80.139.102 ←Blanked the page
• 10:0610:06, 6 July 2011 diff hist −835 User talk:50.80.139.102 Undid revision 434670620 by Atama (talk)

16 June 2011

• 22:5622:56, 16 June 2011 diff hist −401 User talk:50.80.139.102 Undid revision 434668077 by Thecheesykid (talk)
• 22:5322:53, 16 June 2011 diff hist −401 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 22:2422:24, 16 June 2011 diff hist −2 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 22:2222:22, 16 June 2011 diff hist +29 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 21:5021:50, 16 June 2011 diff hist +338 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 21:3821:38, 16 June 2011 diff hist −243 User talk:50.80.139.102 Removed comment by an editor that has already been told to stay off my talk page.
• 21:3021:30, 16 June 2011 diff hist +284 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 21:2821:28, 16 June 2011 diff hist +194 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 21:2521:25, 16 June 2011 diff hist +348 User talk:Favonian →WP:Civility overrules a request to not edit an archive: new section
• 21:2421:24, 16 June 2011 diff hist −294 Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 102 If I get blocked I will be making a formal complaint against you. Reverted edit on the basis of WP:Civility; the fact that it's an archive doesn't insulate it from that.
• 21:2321:23, 16 June 2011 diff hist +220 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 21:1821:18, 16 June 2011 diff hist +232 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 21:1821:18, 16 June 2011 diff hist −294 Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 102 Other editors may not be uncivil. Editors have the ability to remove uncivility.
• 18:3318:33, 16 June 2011 diff hist −294 Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 102 WP:Civility overrules a request to not edit an archive
• 07:1807:18, 16 June 2011 diff hist −294 Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 102 Removed comment about contributor, stick to comments about contributions
• 07:0707:07, 16 June 2011 diff hist +5,792 User talk:216.56.27.132 Undid revision 432004396 by 216.56.27.132 (talk)
• 06:2606:26, 16 June 2011 diff hist 0 Agoraphobia Fear OR panic attacks, not OF (as a diagnosee, I know that the panic attacks themselves do not cause me fear.)
• 06:2106:21, 16 June 2011 diff hist +283 Talk:Agoraphobia →fear of having a panic attack?

12 June 2011

• 20:0420:04, 12 June 2011 diff hist −8,161 User talk:50.80.139.102 ←Replaced content with 'No need to leave me talkback notices, I pay attention. Thanks anyway!'

5 June 2011

• 19:0119:01, 5 June 2011 diff hist +263 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 18:3818:38, 5 June 2011 diff hist +1 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 18:3818:38, 5 June 2011 diff hist +358 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 17:4417:44, 5 June 2011 diff hist +606 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 17:3317:33, 5 June 2011 diff hist +288 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 17:2717:27, 5 June 2011 diff hist +392 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 17:2317:23, 5 June 2011 diff hist +839 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 17:0817:08, 5 June 2011 diff hist +385 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 17:0717:07, 5 June 2011 diff hist −1,221 User talk:50.80.139.102 I could care less. Then other editors can have some dillignence and look through my edit history. There's a reason I state what I'm doing in my summaries: I'm not hiding anything. Those issues are not current- if someone wants history go there.
• 16:3416:34, 5 June 2011 diff hist −920 User talk:50.80.139.102 Orly? I already noticed the report on the Admin noticeboard. Just because I'm an IP user doesn't mean I'm a brain'dead that can't pay attention. Silly bot and silly Wikipedians.
• 16:3016:30, 5 June 2011 diff hist +113 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 16:2816:28, 5 June 2011 diff hist +385 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 16:2016:20, 5 June 2011 diff hist +246 User talk:50.80.139.102 →June 2011
• 16:1316:13, 5 June 2011 diff hist −2,782 User talk:50.80.139.102 rev vandalism
• 16:1116:11, 5 June 2011 diff hist −2,782 User talk:50.80.139.102 rev vandalism
• 16:0816:08, 5 June 2011 diff hist +254 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:4twenty42o reported by User:118.90.142.132 (Result: )
• 16:0316:03, 5 June 2011 diff hist +189 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:50.80.139.102 reported by User:Tommyjb (Result: )
• 16:0016:00, 5 June 2011 diff hist +184 User talk:Atama →How Else
• 15:5815:58, 5 June 2011 diff hist +209 User talk:Thecheesykid →You have absolutely no authority to warn me for ANYTHING.: new section
• 15:5715:57, 5 June 2011 diff hist −2,782 User talk:50.80.139.102 You have absolutely no authority to warn me for ANYTHING.
• 05:0105:01, 5 June 2011 diff hist +276 User talk:Rich Farmbrough →SmackBot Tag Duplication: new section
• 04:5904:59, 5 June 2011 diff hist −45 Alchemy Refimprove is sufficient. An additional Original Research is not necessary.
• 04:5604:56, 5 June 2011 diff hist −47 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 04:5604:56, 5 June 2011 diff hist +1 User talk:50.80.139.102 No edit summary
• 04:5604:56, 5 June 2011 diff hist −30 Alchemy You need to freakin' stop. The content that you are complaining about already has a maintenance template, it does NOT need two.
• 04:5104:51, 5 June 2011 diff hist −30 Alchemy And people say I'm guilty of edit warring. Well I hate to tell you this, but I'm correct, one refimprove is all that is needed for the same content.
• 04:4804:48, 5 June 2011 diff hist −30 Alchemy I think I made myself quite clear the first time thank you.
• 04:4604:46, 5 June 2011 diff hist −30 Alchemy Umm. No. Two refimprove templates for the same content in not needed. When appropriate citations are made, the original research will be apparent.
• 04:4204:42, 5 June 2011 diff hist −30 Alchemy The existing refimprove will take care of the original research that needs cleaned up.