User contributions for 108.48.100.44
Appearance
Results for 108.48.100.44 talk block log logs global block log filter log
3 February 2014
- 03:3003:30, 3 February 2014 diff hist +19 Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser →How does AWB make a list of redlinks?: update
- 03:2903:29, 3 February 2014 diff hist +247 Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser →How does AWB make a list of redlinks?: Its one of the mediawiki API calls
2 February 2014
- 17:4717:47, 2 February 2014 diff hist +471 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Nyttend abusing his tools: If that is all you consider abuse then you definitely should not be an admin
- 17:4317:43, 2 February 2014 diff hist +242 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Block proposal: Also
- 17:4017:40, 2 February 2014 diff hist +590 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Block proposal: Tell BMK and Bushranger to stop being assholes just for the sake of showing how big and bad they are.
- 17:3117:31, 2 February 2014 diff hist +1,804 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Block proposal: Reply to comments
- 03:3803:38, 2 February 2014 diff hist +305 User talk:SummerPhD →Agree with the trout: Not everyone is out to get me, but some are and unfortunately some of them are admins
1 February 2014
- 21:4721:47, 1 February 2014 diff hist +506 User talk:108.48.100.44 →Invitation: Thanks and sorry I overreacted
- 17:5717:57, 1 February 2014 diff hist +719 User talk:Sphilbrick →Response to your comment: Comment on Nyttends personal attacks
- 16:4616:46, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,002 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': REply
- 16:2016:20, 1 February 2014 diff hist +649 User talk:WilliamJE →Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: Comment to William
- 16:1516:15, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': Fix indent
- 16:1516:15, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,495 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': Comment
- 15:5015:50, 1 February 2014 diff hist +211 User talk:108.48.100.44 →Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: This is nothing more than sanctioned personal attacks
- 15:4915:49, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,423 User talk:SummerPhD →Agree with the trout: new section
- 15:3315:33, 1 February 2014 diff hist +986 User talk:108.48.100.44 →Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: Reply to Summer
- 14:5914:59, 1 February 2014 diff hist +209 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Abusive administrator threatening editors for hurting their feelings: Also
- 14:5714:57, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,668 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Abusive administrator threatening editors for hurting their feelings: Reply to the discussion being closed
- 06:5006:50, 1 February 2014 diff hist +899 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Abusive administrator threatening editors for hurting their feelings: reply to Summer
- 06:2806:28, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,031 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Abusive administrator threatening editors for hurting their feelings: Reply to NYttend
- 06:2006:20, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,373 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Abusive administrator threatening editors for hurting their feelings: add a coupe reply's
- 06:0406:04, 1 February 2014 diff hist +309 User talk:108.48.100.44 Thats fine
- 03:4903:49, 1 February 2014 diff hist +253 User talk:108.48.100.44 I went ahead and submitted it to ANI
- 03:4603:46, 1 February 2014 diff hist +394 User talk:WilliamJE →I mentioned yo at ANI: new section
- 03:4503:45, 1 February 2014 diff hist +324 User talk:Orlady →I mentioned you at ANI: new section
- 03:4403:44, 1 February 2014 diff hist +308 User talk:Nyttend →I submitted you to ANI: new section
- 03:4303:43, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,580 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Abusive administrator threatening editors for hurting their feelings: new section
- 03:3103:31, 1 February 2014 diff hist +561 User talk:Orlady Undid revision 593381808 by Nyttend (talk)Its not a personal attack just because you don't agree. You Nyttend are a disgrace of an admin and should resign
- 03:2903:29, 1 February 2014 diff hist +108 User talk:108.48.100.44 Stop being a bully Nyttend. You are a disgrace of an admin
- 03:2803:28, 1 February 2014 diff hist +1,028 User talk:108.48.100.44 You are a disgrace of an admin Nyttend
- 02:2602:26, 1 February 2014 diff hist +561 User talk:Orlady →Reason for block?: If you want to avoid scrutiny Nyttend make better decisions in the future!
- 01:5701:57, 1 February 2014 diff hist +928 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': That is complete BS AGK
29 January 2014
- 20:3220:32, 29 January 2014 diff hist +898 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': Reply to Paul
- 19:3019:30, 29 January 2014 diff hist +1,889 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': Reply to Paul B
- 16:3716:37, 29 January 2014 diff hist +773 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': Also
- 16:3216:32, 29 January 2014 diff hist +505 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': Reply
- 15:5815:58, 29 January 2014 diff hist +1,539 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Administrators lack the subject matter expertise to interpret 'broadly construed': Sanctions and Arbcom are both a joke You may as well ust stop editing Nina
- 15:4815:48, 29 January 2014 diff hist +637 Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/2013 review →Still nothing about dealing with admin abuse: This discussion is not resolved...but I never really expected it to be either.