Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Conservative Woman (2nd nomination)

The Conservative Woman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a blog, created by SPA. No evidence of notability, neither in the presented sources nor in a WP:BEFORE. Lots and lots of WP:REFSPAM - but only one reference link that even mentions the site itself (the New European link) - none of the other references are about The Conservative Woman blog, they're about the authors or contributors. A quick WP:BEFORE showed nobody talking about this site. The previous AFD ended "no consensus" and talked about newspapers discussing the site - but they're not in evidence. At the least, the long sections puffing up the authors need cutting - I was going to cut those, but then the article would literally only have the New European link as a reference. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Doesn't pass the WP:GNG: there's not in-depth coverage of The Conservative Woman in independent reliable sources, which is reflected in the lack of material in the article. Ralbegen (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG - the references in the article don't seem to talk about "The Conservative Woman", rather, about its contributors/founders, and several which are references to the website itself. Also, I can't seem to find any sources elsewhere that demonstrate its notability. Seagull123 Φ 15:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]