User talk:108.48.100.44: Difference between revisions
→Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: This is nothing more than sanctioned personal attacks |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Thanks for letting me know but you guys are ridiculous. I am not WilliaJE, I already told you who I was. I am also very familiar with the SPI instructions and how admins and editors frequently use them to discredit others they don't agree with. The checkuser tool is garbage and always has been. Its prone to false positives. This is nothing more than an attempt to dicredit my attempts to deal with an abusive admin...because this is how its done in the Wikipedia project, why people don't want to edit here and a large reason why I don't edit outside comments anymore. I also resent the insinuation that id I confess and ask for mercy that "leniency" will be granted. Its absurd and insulting. I already told you who I was so please stop being condescending, you already know I already knw all of those instructions and policies better than most of the admins. [[Special:Contributions/108.48.100.44|108.48.100.44]] ([[User talk:108.48.100.44#top|talk]]) 15:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
:Thanks for letting me know but you guys are ridiculous. I am not WilliaJE, I already told you who I was. I am also very familiar with the SPI instructions and how admins and editors frequently use them to discredit others they don't agree with. The checkuser tool is garbage and always has been. Its prone to false positives. This is nothing more than an attempt to dicredit my attempts to deal with an abusive admin...because this is how its done in the Wikipedia project, why people don't want to edit here and a large reason why I don't edit outside comments anymore. I also resent the insinuation that id I confess and ask for mercy that "leniency" will be granted. Its absurd and insulting. I already told you who I was so please stop being condescending, you already know I already knw all of those instructions and policies better than most of the admins. [[Special:Contributions/108.48.100.44|108.48.100.44]] ([[User talk:108.48.100.44#top|talk]]) 15:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
::I replied back to all of this at SPI and just commented back to you there. Now time for me to call Scotty on my communicator. Captain Kirk did always think he was a miracle worker.[[User:WilliamJE|...William]] 15:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
::I replied back to all of this at SPI and just commented back to you there. Now time for me to call Scotty on my communicator. Captain Kirk did always think he was a miracle worker.[[User:WilliamJE|...William]] 15:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::This is nothing more than sanctioned personal attacks for identifying abusive admins. [[Special:Contributions/108.48.100.44|108.48.100.44]] ([[User talk:108.48.100.44#top|talk]]) 15:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:50, 1 February 2014
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Orlady, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Nyttend (talk) 03:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Nyttend:. |First, your warning is nonsense because I don't care about getting blocked. Its just your way of being a bully by using your tools abusively. Secondly, f you think that was a personal attack then you seriously need to get some thicker skin and go back to admin school. That wasn't even close to a personal attack. Just because you fuck up and another editor/non admin calls you out, doesn't make it a personal attack. A personal attack is coming here to this page and threatening me with a block if I don't let you get away with abusing the tools. You Sir are a bully and you are a disgrace. At this point I am convinced you are unfit to be an admin and you should resign immediately in the best interests of the project. The project is better off without admins like you. I would report you to ANI but your fellow admins would only support you and it would be a waste of my time. Additionally you can't just skip to a final warning because i hurt your little feelings. Go reread policy. 108.48.100.44 (talk) 03:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ok I went ahead and reported it to ANI but I don't expect it to amount to much from what I have seen of the process in the past. 108.48.100.44 (talk) 03:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Very well; I brought up at ANI your unrelated personal attacks, e.g. this one. Your comments at Orlady's talk were by no means the only reason I said something to you. Nyttend (talk) 04:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- That's fine...but thats not a personal attack either. With admins like you and your interpretation of Wikipedia policy its pretty obvious why people aren't lining up to edit anymore. 108.48.100.44 (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Very well; I brought up at ANI your unrelated personal attacks, e.g. this one. Your comments at Orlady's talk were by no means the only reason I said something to you. Nyttend (talk) 04:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ok I went ahead and reported it to ANI but I don't expect it to amount to much from what I have seen of the process in the past. 108.48.100.44 (talk) 03:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WilliamJE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SummerPhD (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know but you guys are ridiculous. I am not WilliaJE, I already told you who I was. I am also very familiar with the SPI instructions and how admins and editors frequently use them to discredit others they don't agree with. The checkuser tool is garbage and always has been. Its prone to false positives. This is nothing more than an attempt to dicredit my attempts to deal with an abusive admin...because this is how its done in the Wikipedia project, why people don't want to edit here and a large reason why I don't edit outside comments anymore. I also resent the insinuation that id I confess and ask for mercy that "leniency" will be granted. Its absurd and insulting. I already told you who I was so please stop being condescending, you already know I already knw all of those instructions and policies better than most of the admins. 108.48.100.44 (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- I replied back to all of this at SPI and just commented back to you there. Now time for me to call Scotty on my communicator. Captain Kirk did always think he was a miracle worker....William 15:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- This is nothing more than sanctioned personal attacks for identifying abusive admins. 108.48.100.44 (talk) 15:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- I replied back to all of this at SPI and just commented back to you there. Now time for me to call Scotty on my communicator. Captain Kirk did always think he was a miracle worker....William 15:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)