Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over-arcing: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion for Over-arcing
 
Over-arcing: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Over-arcing]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 11:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
===[[:Over-arcing]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Over-arcing}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over-arcing|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 13#{{anchorencode:Over-arcing}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Over-arcing Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Over-arcing}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over-arcing|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 21#{{anchorencode:Over-arcing}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Over-arcing Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Over-arcing}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Over-arcing}})
[[WP:GNG]]
[[WP:GNG]]
[[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]]
[[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]]
[[WP:NOT PAPER]]
[[WP:NOTTEXTBOOK]] [[User:StringRay|StringRay]] ([[User talk:StringRay|talk]]) 19:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
[[WP:NOTTEXTBOOK]] [[User:StringRay|StringRay]] ([[User talk:StringRay|talk]]) 19:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. It would be better for the nominator to state the reason for deletion in English. In particular I can't see any relevance for [[WP:NOT PAPER]] here. Having got that off my chest this is clearly not a notable topic. I can't find any reliable sources that use this term in this manner, rather than contain an accidental juxtaposition of the words "over" and "arcing", apart from the patent linked in the article which is a primary source. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 14:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Engineering|list of Engineering-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 03:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)</small>
*Sorry, just a gnome and have never nominated something for deletion before and wasn't sure what to write. (Have removed [[WP:NOT PAPER]].) You expressed precisely my thoughts, though. I stumbled upon the entry because I was Googling the difference between "overarcing" and "overarching". The latter is correct usage. The former is a non-word except for this specific engineering thing, which is definitely not notable. [[User:StringRay|StringRay]] ([[User talk:StringRay|talk]]) 19:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="background:Black;padding:1px 5px">[[User:Buidhe|<b style="color: White">b</b>]][[User talk:Buidhe|<b style="color: White">uidh</b>]][[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|<b style="color: White">e</b>]]</span> 01:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 11:52, 29 February 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Over-arcing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG WP:NOTDIRECTORY WP:NOTTEXTBOOK StringRay (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It would be better for the nominator to state the reason for deletion in English. In particular I can't see any relevance for WP:NOT PAPER here. Having got that off my chest this is clearly not a notable topic. I can't find any reliable sources that use this term in this manner, rather than contain an accidental juxtaposition of the words "over" and "arcing", apart from the patent linked in the article which is a primary source. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, just a gnome and have never nominated something for deletion before and wasn't sure what to write. (Have removed WP:NOT PAPER.) You expressed precisely my thoughts, though. I stumbled upon the entry because I was Googling the difference between "overarcing" and "overarching". The latter is correct usage. The former is a non-word except for this specific engineering thing, which is definitely not notable. StringRay (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 01:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.