Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Armstrong
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stacy Armstrong)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete 5 / Keep 3: No consensus. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:25, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Update: The nominator was not counted as a delete, but should have been. That makes the vote 6-3. I'll go delete Stacy Armstrong now. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:41, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
And yet another non-notable actress. -R. fiend 21:33, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. What the hell is an EARP award anyway? I can't find anything on google for it. Winning an obscure award doesn't make someone notable. Average Earthman 14:14, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. --Irishpunktom\talk 16:06, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this and the above ones. This is the first person i've seen who has a blank imdb page. I can't believe that some of these 'actors' have had articles for months. Xezbeth 18:27, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
- keep Vagrant
- Delete, yada, yada, yada. Edeans 06:25, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. Let's err on the side of being a comprehensive resource.Zantastik 07:51, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non notable. Comprehensive doesn't mean that we have to include every actress or actor. This article doesn't even say whether she was a star in any of these productions. --Woohookitty 07:54, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This is an Encyclopedia, not "all things that have ever existed". RickK 07:59, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, but with reservations. Article needs definite expansion. Megan1967 05:45, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Can it be expanded without going into vanity? Average Earthman 10:14, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.