Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 October 24

October 24

File:Fresh Kid Ice 1990s.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1 and 8 since there is a free image already and a "photo of him during the prime of his group with the visual aesthetics that came with it" isn't needed. It isn't necessary to have a photo of him wearing a baseball and gold chain to understand the article, so there's nothing that isn't covered by the free image File:Young Fresh Kid Ice.jpg (I erroneously assmued the 1990s image was left over after a free image was added, it turns out the non-free image was added despite the free image being in the article). Kathleen's bike (talk) 08:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kathleen's bike I don't think it fails 8. Since the photo file "File:Young Fresh Kid Ice.jpg)" his a photo of him has a teen, prior to his rise to fame and not in the context of his historical relevance. While he has a hip hop edge as a youth it is not at all the same look at all.

It also contextualize the time when he did hip-hop music specifically the Miami bass genre of the late 1980s and 1990s. That came with specific visual ascetics.

It would be like a photo of Napoleon as a teen instead of the image without the hat we are accustom to. Filmman3000 (talk) 03:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no requirement for a photograph of Fresh Kid Ice at any particular point in his career. Kathleen's bike (talk) 09:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Not contextually significant. Edward-Woodrow • talk 20:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Union Bank Original Office Location Morrisville 1891.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion at media copyright questions. I don't believe this meets the non-free content criteria. In particular, the picture of the building could be replaced (fails #1), either by someone else taking a picture of the modern building (under freedom of panorama) or finding a historical picture which would be out of copyright. The infographic doesn't seem to provide "contextual significance" (fails #8) since the information could be communicated with text. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 09:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only copyrighted element would be the text, if the photo is indeed from 1891. If that is long enough to be copyrightable and no other historic image can be found, then one could always crop this one. Felix QW (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hackney diamonds limited edition.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussed critically or used for any educational purpose. This album has about 40 covers. Fails WP:NFCC. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TK Uniform.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads from multiple cameras. Source in {{Information}} asserted to be Tanjong Katong Secondary. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: user probably just didn't understand what the source parameter in the information template meant (maybe thought it was location). Also the user could have simply had two cameras/replaced one of their cameras. — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much]} 17:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pulau Ubin TK.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads from multiple cameras. Source in {{Information}} asserted to be Tanjong Katong Secondary. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: user probably just didn't understand what the source parameter in the information template meant (maybe thought it was location). Also the user could have simply had two cameras/replaced one of their cameras. — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much]} 17:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Winners.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads from multiple cameras. Source in {{Information}} asserted to be Tanjong Katong Secondary. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salt this highly generic file name. If kept, rename, if deleted, then just salt -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 04:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: user probably just didn't understand what the source parameter in the information template meant (maybe thought it was location). Also the user could have simply had two cameras/replaced one of their cameras. Also rename and salt per IP above. — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much]} 17:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tanjong Katong Secondary School Assembly Plaza.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads from multiple cameras. Source in {{Information}} asserted to be Tanjong Katong Secondary. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: user probably just didn't understand what the source parameter in the information template meant (maybe thought it was location). Also the user could have simply had two cameras/replaced one of their cameras. — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much]} 17:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steve Ditko.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a freely-licensed piece of media on this page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Tanglin-Club.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Icon at the top is probably above TOO in US and Singapore — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much!]} 16:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tanglin Club uses a better quality image File:Tanglin Club Vertical Logo 2020.jpg; if this is found to be PD-simple, then the better quality one would also be PD-simple, and both then should be moved to Commons -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The crest is the copyrightable element within the logo. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Japanese-issued 1 Philippine peso banknote, 1942 (reverse).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly licensed as {{PD-US}}. Unclear if any free license applies. ✗plicit 23:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: Keep: c:Template:PD-Japan-exempt applies per c:COM:CUR Japan — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much!]} 10:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.