Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 January 17
< January 16 | January 18 > |
---|
January 17
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Papa November (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The One Where They Build A House 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BeamerSPG (notify | contribs).
- Image does not significantly contribute to the reader's understanding. Rationale is also insufficient as it doesn't make a claim about this specific image or the specific article. Jay32183 (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The image resolution is far too large and takes up much of the screen, making formatting of the page harder for the reader to navigate. Also does not meet U.S. Fair Use Laws because it is rather large in resolution, does not convey the topic or help educate the reader. Coreywalters06 (talk) 05:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The use seems fine to me, although it could be a bit smaller. Keep. Stifle (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In what way is the use fine? The rationale does not begin to explain the use of the image. It only explains that non-free images are sometimes allowed on Wikipedia. The apparent use is that the article needs to have an image and no free one can be created. Although no free image can be created, the article does not necessarily need an image. The image does not contribute to the reader's understanding. It fails WP:NFCC #8 and #10c. Jay32183 (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Papa November (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by BorgQueen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Plane crash into Hudson River cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Greg L (notify | contribs).
- copyright on flickr is "All rights reserved" Raeky (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- After following the provided link in the picture's info page, the flickr image's copyright is not listed as "Creative Commons Attribution 2.0" but is "All rights reserved" without the option to download different sizes. I believe the author has changed the copyright after this image was pulled by the bot, should it remain here? Raeky (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. According to this FAQ, Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. --BorgQueen (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I can confirm that I saw the image on Flickr with CC-BY-2.0 licensing on Thursday. As the license can't be revoked, this is a keep. Stifle (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I also saw it with CC licensing earlier. Plus it was uploaded with the flickrbot (which refuses to upload non-CC images) and a couple comments on the photo mention its CC licensing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as above, but this is a Commons image and will be deleted here anyway once it's off the main mage. Sandstein 09:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Plane crash into Hudson River.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Greg L (notify | contribs).
- Copyright on flickr reads "All rights reserved" Raeky (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PacketTrapLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevenmgoodman (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Obsolete by File:PTLOGO.png Nv8200p talk 13:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Packnsend_packing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rekha.singh (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Packnsend_team.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rekha.singh (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 13:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Paddockmainsite.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wisdomkale (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 13:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pads4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dandan_dominguez (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Page_Sign.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jimbo_Herndan (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pahawh_Hmong_sample_writing.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pahuahcentury (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Painless.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikifever15 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, could be useful to illustrate stitches. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Palc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tigerrag_99 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Palle_Rasmussen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tomektadla1 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PaloMayo_caribe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hanek45 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pammi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Satyajit83 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 14:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pan_Am_07.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Donsutherland (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 14:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pandora_fms.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Raulofpandora (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:James Arthur Ray, Personal Growth Expert, Gray Jacket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jamesray (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, uploaded only for long-deleted advertisement B (talk) 14:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Paperboyjack1ani.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hexefeuer (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Paranormal_ghost.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thug_outlaw69 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Parentslaughingmichaelparodi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andrew_Parodi (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 14:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Parokya_ni_Aguda.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sethaguda (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality Nv8200p talk 14:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Partasian100%hapa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TAG speakers (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE Nv8200p talk 14:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Image-ffr1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Radimedical (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, contains only uneditable text with commercial reference. Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ffr7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Radimedical (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, contains mostly uneditable text and low resolution versions of images for which better alternatives are already available. Text one-sidedly emphasizes benefits of FFR, which is POV. Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - image is replaceable by a free alternative (user created image) - fails WP:NFCC#1 - Peripitus (Talk) 02:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Usage.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SnappingTurtle (notify | contribs).
- Fair-use screenshot that doesn't improve reader's understanding of the subject matter (viral videos). Politizer talk/contribs 18:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article as it was before the image did not provide any examples of the growth in viewing of a viral video. The image provides a clear and visually interesting example of a viral video's popularity. SnappingTurtle (talk) 19:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image provides illustration of the sudden increase in view over a short period of time - which is the essence of a viral video. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.173.164 (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closer: This IP may be a single-purpose account. Politizer talk/contribs 19:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, since its raw data, it can be reinterpreted into a free content image. ViperSnake151 20:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This screenshot has the air of authenticity about it --- the numbers may be the essence, but an original screenshot is far more interesting to the reader than a generic display. And as 82.38.* said, it's an excellent illustration of typical audience over time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sietse (talk • contribs) 20:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, replaceable by a free image which could be created. Stifle (talk) 21:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, replaceable by a table of numbers. No need to use some copyrighted web site's presentation model here. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, too blurry to be useful B (talk) 18:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't contribute any information. Politizer talk/contribs 18:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Premierelogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ferdinand h2 (notify | contribs).
- Image is a historical logo of a TV network. Rationale is the standard boilerplate about needing to identify the subject of the article; however, this purpose is already achieved by the current logo presented in the infobox. No need for a second image, and article contains no commentary on the relevance of this older logo. In short, fails NFCC #3a and #8. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Many articles about companies also contain their old logos, for example BP and Apple, so why can't Premiere have a picture of their old logo? Ferdinand h2 (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The difference is that those articles, Apple in particular, contain sourced discussion of the logos in the prose. If the old Premier logo is the subject of some discussion in a reliable source, then its inclusion could also be justifiable. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Many articles about companies also contain their old logos, for example BP and Apple, so why can't Premiere have a picture of their old logo? Ferdinand h2 (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LlamadodeEmergencia058 v2.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by El cangri386 (notify | contribs).
- This image doesn't seem to meet the requirements of WP:NFCC, specifically #8. It is used for decoration only and does not add to readers' understanding of the article. Stifle (talk) 21:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: The result was delete, per the discussion here. The alternate UK cover is not itself notable, or helpful to the understanding of the album. Alternate covers are exceptionally common and typical, and not particularly notable for the extra fair use under NFCC. If this one was talked about and discussed in it's own right, I would close as Keep, but that's not the case here. rootology (C)(T) 20:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Joss Stone - TMWWGDN UK.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie (notify | contribs).
- Also File:Joss Stone - Tell Me Bout It video.jpg, uploaded by the same user.
- I think these image fail WP:NFCC#3a as multiple non-free images are being used when one would suffice, and also fail WP:NFCC#8 as failing to increase readers' understanding of the subject. Note the word "understanding". Identifying one of the many covers that an album has been released under has nothing to do with understanding the article. Stifle (talk) 21:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Blatant deletionist attitude. They're both important to the article, especially the video screenshot, which does help readers' understanding of the concept and appearance of the music video. Besides, the alternate cover is significantly different. Funk Junkie (talk) 20:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing NFCC#8 and NFCC#3a. There is no discussion nor mention of the image on the cover and its use in this article is simply decorative. - Peripitus (Talk) 03:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Alternate cover is very different. (See article Tell Me What We're Gonna Do Now) Showing the identifying images for a record is considered part of the "significant understanding" an article should convey about it. That isn't restricted just to the UK identifying image, nor to just the U.S. identifying image. When there are very different images in the UK and the U.S. as here, each is significant and should be shown. Jheald (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets WP:NFC criteria. Two images is clearly minimal use under criteria #3, and criteria #8 is met as the alternate album covers cannot be adequately described textually, therefore, the image significantly increases the reader's understanding.--2008Olympianchitchat 07:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Images do not increase the readers' understanding as the images are not discussed, they're just there. The album cover rationales both indicate that the images are the primary means of visual identification, therefore one of the album cover images in the article fail 10c since rationales must be specific to the image. The video screenshot appears to just show what Joss Stone looks like, and the rationale actually indicates that the image is decorative. Jay32183 (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I feel that this image fails NFCC#8 as failing to substantially increase readers' understanding of the subject. In the case of the image's use on Joanne Catherall, it also fails NFCC#1 as being replaceable by a free image. Stifle (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree with both. Even if this image is kept, there is no possible justification for its use on the biography article. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - use on biography article fails to increase reader's understanding and as a living subject, free image may be obtained.--2008Olympianchitchat 07:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.