Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 18 April 20 >

April 19

[edit]

Category:Quincy Jones family

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 02:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Standard naming for families of individuals. ★Trekker (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No it does not. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well thats what you think, fact is still that "Family of Foo" is still standard over "Foo family".★Trekker (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ascension Thursday songs

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Easter hymns. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete or merge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only one article. As there is no category for Ascension Thursday, possibly merge to Category:Eastertide. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:German Silesia

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, German Silesia is and was never a real administrative entity, it is merely a made-up intersection between a past Province of Silesia and a current country. Note that the larger part of Silesia is currently in Poland, only a tiny corner of it stretches into current Germany. The category also overlaps quite a bit with the Lusatia categories nominated below by User:Fayenatic london. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The problem with the nomination is that the category was never intended to deal with an "administrative entity" but with a historical region and especially with the area that still makes part of Germany (like the former counties in Northern Ireland, which by the way also overlap with the present administrative jurisdictions).--Darius (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. German Silesia isn't a historical region while Silesia is.
  2. Even if it were a historical region, it should contain articles about the historical region - but these articles apparently do not exist, not even an article about German Silesia itself. The category merely contains articles about populated places which tell us nothing about German Silesia as a region. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per precedent, categories for populated places in former countries should not be allowed. If German Silesia is a thing at all, it is a former thing. The contents consists only of current places in the former thing. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per precedents. Province of Silesia contains a list of districts; it might be useful to tabulate those lists with a column or colour code to indicate the current country, and to add a column for cities and towns within each district. However, using categories for this is not appropriate. – Fayenatic London 10:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Viking Age in the British Isles

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, this category does not add something to Category:Viking Age by country. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is quite a different discussion: should the by-modern-country exist at all? Still, the British Isles category does not solve that problem, since Ireland, Scotland and England had a very different history. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 09:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Followup to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#Category:LGBT-related controversies in Switzerland. These categories all also suffer from the same problem: they're one-entry or two-entry categories being used solely to categorize the overview articles "LGBT rights in X" and/or "LGBT history in X" rather than actual articles about any specific controversies. Bearcat (talk) 16:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ovenbirds

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Seems to be the same topic; see ovenbirds. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:French chronicle writers

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I dont see any distinction here. No other categories of "chronicle writers". Rathfelder (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Avonmore, Pennsylvania

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small one county community with just 3 entries. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Populated places in Lower Lusatia

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 22:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Following many precedents, we do not categorise populated places by former administrative regions. – Fayenatic London 10:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mayan chiefdoms of the Yucatán Peninsula

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#Category:Mayan chiefdoms of the Yucatán Peninsula

Category:User siyi-1

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and any user can boldly create Category:User tisa and 1-5. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nonsense babel category - Category:User siyi does not exist and "siyi" does not appear to be a valid language code. While I understand that this was created to clear Special:WantedCategories, it's not clear why the creator didn't just remove it from the sole member's user page, since that user hasn't objected to several other redlinked categories being removed. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User nz-m

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category seems to cover the exact same ground as its parent. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User harpsichord

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale Unneeded empty categories that are not intended to become empty on occasion and incorrectly named. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User oji-2

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Useless isolated babel category not part of a wider series and containing only one subcategory that's better categorized elsewhere. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Depreciated sources on Wikipedia

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) JBchrch talk 22:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete This is not an encyclopedic category, is self-referential, contains categorically wrong entries (like arXiv or Anadolu Agency, which are not deprecated by any stretch of the imagination) and is misspelled. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_19&oldid=1090401559"