Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Murdock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vince Murdock

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a mixed martial arts fighter. No top tier promotion fight and have not worn a top tier promotion title. Fails WP:MMABIO CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Fighter fought in Bellator multiple times and has been called to UFC, but due to his suspension, he was replaced. In the worst case, he marginally passes WP:MMABIO. --Chelyx (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Bellator as top tier promotion is from 2009 to 2015. Pls see WP:MMATIER. During 2009 to 2015 subject had fought only 1 fight under the promotion. To pass MMABIO, the subject needs at least 3 fights under top tier promotion. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:17, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He fails to meet the notability criteria for MMA fighters since he has only 1 of the required 3 top tier fights. Given his 20 month suspension, it will be quite some time before he can meet WP:NMMA. The coverage is typical sports reporting for his fights and listings in databases. There's nothing to show his coverage is atypical and meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 22:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.