Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viki Chatsworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Minor Passions characters. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Viki Chatsworth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:FICT, WP:NOTE and WP:RS. Limited evidence of independent notability. Aoba47 (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions Aoba47 (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~-- I wanted to say "redirect" to Passions, but a "Viki" (no last name) is mentioned there only once. So this appears to be a very minor character and the article should be deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Passions characters and cast, perhaps? I doubt that there is a notable real-world person by this name due to the unusual spelling, and Google hasn't revealed any. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, we have Minor Passions characters; whether we should is another question, but that would no-doubt serve as a suitable merge target. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @J Milburn: Merging this article into Minor Passions characters seems like an acceptable course of action. Aoba47 (talk) 04:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Minor Passions characters is a good solution. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.