Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Professor (Columbia)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- University Professor (Columbia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is an uncited list of full time current faculty at Columbia. I can't find secondary sources to support the position of University Professor at Columbia anymore notable than any other job elsewhere. The prod remover said it passed WP:PROF, but since the article isn't about professors but a position which professor hold, I don't see how that guideline is relevant. TM 04:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but rename. This is a valid navigational tool, I think, but it should be called something like List of University Professors at Columbia University. That's a little wordy, but accurate, I think.
FiniteCoherent list, notable contents, finite length, useful function. It's missing some sort of note on sourcing. Carrite (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] - Why not merge and redirect to List of Columbia University people?--TM 16:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable rank at famous university. I'd retitle as Carrite suggests. DGG ( talk ) 01:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC) .[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.