Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unisound Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dan Swanö. Randykitty (talk) 11:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unisound Studios

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N. The article has few references, none of which are sufficient, and a search online for more fails to produce more. It's possible that a product released by them is sufficiently notable for its own page, and this is reinforced by the existence of a number of blue links in the article, but per WP:NORG, this does not confer notability on the Studio itself. -- NoCOBOL (talk) 08:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This article has about 60 incoming links, most of which lead to its former title Unisound which was recently usurped by a different subject. (I understand that link count is not an argument against deletion.) Certes (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have just removed that article that was at Unisound and put it in draft - there's a probable COI there. But I don't think this article should be moved back until this deletion discussion reaches a conclusion. Deb (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect Unisound to Dan Swanö – The current title was created as an attempt at disambiguation, but there's no indication the studio was ever known by this name. While discussing this title with the (non-COI, in my opinion) editor Redwards21, I noticed that this displaced article would not meet current AfC standards for establishing notability. Redirecting to the notable person who is the producer behind Unisound makes the most sense to me. Whether the list of productions needs to be carried over depends on how much you like lists. I don't think it's strictly necessary. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. --PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 14:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dan Swanö, as although notable albums may have been produced there WP:NOTINHERITED, it may be appropriate to include some words about this aspect of Swanö's contribution to the music scene. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the talk page Draft talk:Unisound contains an incorrect history note about a non-existent cut-paste from Unisound Studios. It seems the author of the Beijing Unisound article thinks the incorrect history note should be kept around for some reason. If this page is deleted, something need to be done to fix the history attribution, since it implies that the Unisound Studios article contains edit history for the Beijing Unisound article. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 05:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dan Swanö. On its own, this topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.