Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There Is a Light

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There Is a Light

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP. KH-1 (talk) 03:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Companies. KH-1 (talk) 03:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NCORP is irrelevant here; the main issue is, this label has no notable artists and does not capture any sort of noteworthy musical scene. It's released almost no music. Even if it passed NCORP (and the article has several sources that approach at least GNG territory), I don't know why we'd have reason to cover it. Chubbles (talk) 05:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.