Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queen (Lady Gaga song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Born This Way (album). (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude (talk) 08:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Queen (Lady Gaga song)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONGS. No notability on its own, outside of album reviews. + Uses untrustworthy sources. (e.g. PopCrush, PopDust, Ibtimes.com) Sricsi (talk) 19:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sricsi (talk) 19:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's a well-written article, but unfortunate that you're right about the lack of notability. One of the few cited sources that talk about the song by its own merits is dead, even. I count one left (the PopCrush source) that talks about the song in its own right, everything else is an album review, chart position (and it didn't chart that well), or unreliable. WPscatter ^t/_c 19:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the album, the song isn't notable on its own, even the Rolling Stone articles used as sources are at best brief mentions of this musical item. Oaktree b (talk) 20:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Born This Way (album) the only pieces mentioning this track that aren't album reviews seem to just be brief listings (e.g. how it charted) or poor quality. Simply not enough to warrant an article. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the album, which is usually the case with songs not notable enough to stand on their own. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 00:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge its content to Born This Way album if not already present. A quick read this is just fancrufty material sourced from album reviews. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 20:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Born This Way (album) per WP:NSONG. QuietHere (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Born This Way (album). Fails WP:NSONG per nom. Not enough independent coverage about it. SBKSPP (talk) 00:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Born This Way (album) per WP:NSONG. There is not enough coverage, but a redirect would benefit readers more than outright deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.