Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mighty Jingles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 01:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Mighty Jingles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article Subject is non-notable. Article cites only two sources, which are one-off interviews. Majority of article is uncited, and contains original research. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 17:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP: Notability Review

I have been asked to provide additional explanation per WP:Notability. I shall do so: Basic Criteria

"People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."

I see two sources, which are insignificant interviews.

Alright, let's look at additional applicable criteria.

Wikiproject Military History Notability Guide: People

"In particular, individuals will almost always have sufficient coverage to qualify if they:

Were awarded their nation's highest award for valour; or Were awarded their nation's second-highest award for valour (such as the Navy Cross) multiple times; or Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer, or their historical equivalents; or Held the top-level military command position of their nation's armed forces (such as Chief of the General Staff), or of a department thereof (such as Chief of Army Staff); or Played an important role in a significant military event; or Commanded a substantial body of troops in combat; or Made a material contribution to military science that is indisputably attributed to them; or Were the undisputed inventor of a form of military technology which significantly changed the nature of or conduct of war; or Were recognized by their peers as an authoritative source on military matters/writing."

Sure, maybe in World of Tanks, but that isn't what I call a war...

Any Biography

1. The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. 2. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.

None of the above apply.

Entertainers

1. Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. 2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. 3. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.

2. MAY apply if 400k subscribers count, but I don't consider the Youtube subscriber count to be entirely reliable.

Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 21:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please {{ping}} me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 17:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication of notability in the article, the first ref is an interview (primary source), the other is a one-sentence trivial mention in an article on youtube game intruction videos in general. Kraxler (talk) 17:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.