Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jolly Rogers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Jolly Rogers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NMUSIC. Only source cited is their website, google search brings up social media and passing mentions on Ren Faire websites that would not constitute WP:SIGCOV or meet WP:GNG in my eyes Bkissin (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while it could be argued that the band "Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style," it still has to meet WP:BAND and WP:GNG and I could find no coverage at all to meet the requirement that the band, "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article is entirely sourced to WP:SELFPUBLISHED WP:PRIMARY sources, and it doesn't look like there's anything better out there. - GretLomborg (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.