Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The DO-IT Center
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No views in favour of deletion after expansion and additional sourcing. Michig (talk) 07:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The DO-IT Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable self-sourced article about campus center. Orange Mike | Talk 21:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable, fails WP:GNG ukexpat (talk) 02:54, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The DO-IT Center is not only a campus center; its programs are directed toward assisting students with disabilities and training faculty at national and international levels. I wrote the original article (so the self-sourcing is my fault; I thought I was properly "quoting" them by sourcing their own materials; am working to fix this). I've added an Awards section to demonstrate notability. Also: I created the article because the DO-IT Center and its programs are referenced several times on Wikipedia, including the DO-IT Scholars Program and Universal design for instruction. I'm working on adding more notable sources to the article now. If it is decided that it still fails notability, it could be redirected/merged with the DO-IT Scholars Program. AlmostRutger (talk) 04:24, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Have added outside sources (New York Times, Seattle Times), and a paragraph on the Center's international collaborations. Am continuing to update & edit. AlmostRutger (talk) 02:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Updated article with additional information about AccessComputing Alliance, a notable nationwide program directed by the DO-IT Center. AlmostRutger (talk) 11:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Updated article with Impact section, additional outside sources. AlmostRutger (talk) 02:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:18, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 01:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep AlmostRutger has expanded the article, adding enough references to show notability, and also showing that this is not just a local center, but one with national and international influence. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep after expansion (though it now has lots of duplicated text and needs editing). – SJ + 03:09, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.