Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Riches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus was that the WP:LOTSOFSOURCES argument was invalid Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Riches

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The dozen or so references are primary sources, brief mentions, and generally unreliable sources. Her songwriting and other work has not provided any lasting notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 21:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above, fails WP:MUSICBIO and insubstantial RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Lacks reliable sources. Snowycats (talk) 04:15, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article may fail WP:MUSICBIO but passes WP:GNG 2405:205:A049:9F38:EC0F:BD3C:D01B:3E08 (talk) 19:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- MUSICBIO 1 = GNG. Exactly which sources discuss the subject in detail? Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. No coverage from reliable sources. The person doesn't WP:INHERIT notability from Hillsong Church. Newslinger (talk) 13:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.