Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset Records (2009th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keeping, as the article meets general notability guidelines. Thanks everyone for your participation and for assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunset Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Uncited for *over ten years*. (contested PROD) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - horribly written article, with no citations. However, this is an important record label, in that it was not only a reissue label (as per current article status), but issued otherwise unreleased material by The T-Bones ([1]), The Ventures, Henry Mancini, and Flip Wilson, among others. As a long time collector/researcher, I consider any label listed at Both Sides Now to be a notable label worthy of encyclopedic attention. There is probably in-depth information about Sunset at [2]. There's no preview, but my local library holds it and I'll look it up. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As long as the article can be given good sourcing and be rewritten to bring it up to snuff.TH1980 (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets GNG. Please see my substantial revisions to the article. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Much-needed overhaul by 78.26. However, the overlong list of signed artists could probably stand to be pared down a little. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 05:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.