Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundhog (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Soundhog

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Soundhog
• Articles for deletion/Soundhog (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Soundhog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. This piece in North Wales Live is the only piece of non-SPS coverage I can find and does not demonstrate notability. An AfD in 2004 demonstrated a consensus to delete (IMO) but was never closed. Vladimir.copic (talk) 03:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Wales. Vladimir.copic (talk) 03:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Delete: I found this piece also, but it doesn't look altogether independent and notability doesn't appear established Jack4576 (talk) 06:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete: Fails BLP, GNG and BIO. Sources in article and BEFORE are promotional. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  23:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.